Inglorious nominees

Can “The Hurt Locker” “Blind Side” “Avatar”?

Are Sandra Bullock’s chances of winning best actress really “Up in the Air”?

These questions and more will be answered when the Oscars are handed out next month.

The Oscar nominations were announced Tuesday and already there’s talk in the industry that it’s the “battles of the ex’s” between James Cameron’s megahit other-worldly “Avatar” and his ex-wife Kathryn Bigelow’s independent no money-making intense Iraq war drama “The Hurt Locker.”

Insiders are giving the edge to Bigelow’s picture in this quintessential David and Goliath struggle, movie-wise.

This year there are 10 films nominated for best picture, with the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences opening up the playing field for more of the box office favorites that wouldn’t have made the final cut if there was just the traditional five nominees.

This still narrows the list down to the five in the running that have corresponding best director nominations. The Academy seems to have nominated popular movies that won’t win but will grab a TV audience that will root for them anyway.

What “Inglorious Basterds” those Academy members.

The telecast would grab a big audience anyway since “Avatar” is nominated and everybody has seen “Avatar.”

“Avatar” would certainly be an audience favorite should it win. In fact, of all the movies that have the best chance of winning, it’s the only one that’s capable of sweeping in the nine categories in which it’s nominated. The reason: Besides the two big prizes, best film and best director, the other nominations for “Avatar” are in technical categories like cinematography, editing and sound. Even original score could be lumped in that group.

“Avatar” has no nominations in the screenplay or acting categories. Movies have won best picture without a single cast member garnering a nomination (like last year’s winner, “Slumdog Millionaire” and the winner a few year’s back, “Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King,” which went on to win 11 Oscars.)

But a screenplay nomination is as key to a movie winning best picture as the director’s recognition —- almost 100 percent of the time. There are exceptions, though —– the last movie to win a best picture Oscar without a screenplay nomination was “Titanic,” directed by James Cameron.

This works in favor of “The Hurt Locker.” By looking at the key categories movies get nods offers clue as to what movie is likely to win the top award.

“Hurt Locker” scored nominations not only in the two major categories, but for best actor and best original screenplay. Though it in no way will sweep, it could take home at least four Oscars: picture, director, original screenplay and film editing.

If “Hurt Locker” should win, it would be the first best picture winner in decades that essentially bombed at the box office. Considering its praise from critics and how it matched the mega-hit “Avatar” with the most nominations, that doesn’t seem to matter.

What could see “Hurt Locker” lose the top award is politics. In show business? Politics? You bet’cha.

Will liberal Hollywood vote it down because the movie is about Iraq —– George W. Bush’s war?

Maybe the producers of the film could campaign for the movie winning best picture using a Fox News technique:

“A vote for ‘The Hurt Locker’ means you support the troops. A vote against it, and the terrorists have won.”

It’s a tough call for which of the two most nominated front-runners will win best picture. Arguments could be made for both sides.

There were few surprises with the announcement of the nominations. There will be fewer suprises come Oscar night.

Here are some of the shoo-in winners:

1. Sandra Bullock, best actress, “The Blind Side.” With her new (and not quite fair) moniker as “America’s new sweetheart,” Bullock finally found a sure-fire role that will put her in the same Oscar company as the actress some Hollywood types say she’s replacing, Julia Roberts.

2. Mo’Nique, best supporting actress, “Precious.” Like Bullock, she’s a force to be reckoned with in the category in which the four other nominees, while worthy of a nomination, are actually supporting her star turn.

3. Jeff Bridges, best actor, “Crazy Heart.” The popular favorite who has been in the bidness for 40 years and has been nominated four other times, and lost. Sure, the role he plays —- alcoholic washed-up country-western singer — is a movie cliche, but this is “The Dude” we’re talkin’ about, dammit.

4. Christoph Waltz, best supporting actor, “Inglorious Basterds.” A scene-stealer in a Quentin Tarantino movie means you’re stealing the thunder from the filmmaker himself. No easy task. Waltz, like Bullock, Mo’Nique, and Bridges, has won the Golden Globe and Screen Actors Guild awards.

All four should repeat at the Oscars. Sidebar: On some occasions, there is an upset in one of the acting categories. If it happens this year, it will come in the supporting actor category. The veteran actor Christopher Plummer, now 80, received his first Oscar nomination this year playing Leo Tolstoy in “The Last Station.” There could be a Jack Palance, Alan Arkin sentimental moment on the Oscar horizon.

Sure winners:

1. Best animated feature: “Up.”

2. Visual effects: “Avatar.” (Duh!)

Likely winners:

1. Original screenplay: Mark Boal, “The Hurt Locker.” Though a last-minute surge by Tarantino is possible.

2. Adapted Screenplay: Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner, “Up in the Air” —- the film that could upset the two top contenders. On the other hand, if the film gets shut out, a better possibility, look for Geoffrey Fletcher for “Precious” to win.

Best song: Who cares, after a win in this category a few years ago for “It’s Hard Out There for a Pimp,” does this award matter anymore?

Speaking of songs, the Oscarcast is missing out again this year by not having Billy Crystal as host (Steve Martin will be one of the hosts — OK; the other is Alec Baldwin, Really, enough of him already.)

Crystal’s opening act for the show would always be titles from the nominated movies put to hilarious words and the music of famous songs.

It would have been a hoot seeing how he’d handle the 10 nominated movies.

One could only imagine the words and music he’d come up with for “Inglorious Basterds.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Inglorious nominees

  1. MJP says:

    Instead of your interminable babble about the Oscars, how about commenting on this “Glorious” news:

    Fox News had its best January in the history of the network, and was the only cable news network to grow year-to-year.

    FNC also had the top 13 programs on cable news in total viewers for the fifth month in a row, and the top 13 programs in the A25-54 demographic for the first time in more than five years.
    FNC grew in double digits in both total viewers and the A25-54 demographic from January 2009. In prime time, it was up 22% in total viewers and 51% in the demo. CNN was down 34% and 37% and MSNBC down 26% and 38%. In total day, FNC was up 16% and 28%. CNN was down 34% and 41% and MSNBC down 28% and 39%. Last January all networks performed while with the Inauguration coverage. This month, the big political event was Scott Browns victory in Massachusetts, which FNC dominated in the ratings.

  2. paul C in PA says:


    So glad you defeated the other personalities…I was worried. Also glad to hear you still have the ability to regurgitate Rush. Now you have to trust me…I’ve been in TV for 30 years…EVERYTHING on TV is a mess and a lie to get ratings. If you’re basing opinions on TV…any TV, it’s a very bad thing.

  3. payday loans says:

    Everything is very open with a really clear description of the challenges.

    It was truly informative. Your website is useful. Thanks for sharing!
    payday loans el cajon

  4. Way cool! Some very valid points! I appreciate you writing this
    article and the rest of the website is extremely good.
    raspberry ketone diet plan

  5. Hello there! This article could not be written any better!
    Looking through this post reminds me of my previous roommate!
    He constantly kept talking about this. I will send this
    post to him. Fairly certain he will have a good read.
    Thanks for sharing!

  6. more info says:

    Pretty! This was an incredibly wonderful article.

    Thanks for providing these details. http://www.

  7. I love reading through an article that will make men and women think.

    Also, thank you for allowing for me to comment!

  8. That is a good tip especially to those new to the blogosphere.
    Short but very precise info Many thanks for sharing this one.
    A must read article! pay day loan uk

  9. This site was… how do I say it? Relevant!! Finally I have
    found something that helped me. Appreciate it! payday loan uk

  10. ppi claims says:

    Good post. I learn something totally new and challenging on sites I stumbleupon everyday.

    It’s always helpful to read through articles from other writers and practice something from their web sites. ppi claim form

  11. tv online says:

    Very good info. Lucky me I came across your blog by chance (stumbleupon).
    I’ve book marked it for later! tv live

  12. Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon every day.

    It’s always helpful to read articles from other authors and practice something from other web sites. live tv

  13. Loren says:

    You could possibly either remit the amount through twine transfer or
    approve the lender to be withdraw the quick loan amount on the
    right particular date.
    When you need an income all of their sudden during which
    the mid of ones month, you may have very limited versions to solve a problem.

    payday uk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>