Opera: May 2010 Archives
The GNOME Web browser Epiphany — formerly based on Mozilla's Gecko engine and now based on Webkit — doesn't ship with Ubuntu (though it does with Debian and most GNOME-based distros/projects).
But if you're running GNOME, I recommend you add it via your favorite package manager.
What Epiphany offers is a streamlined, faster, less-resource-intensive browsing experience.
I have a few Web-delivered apps that absolutely require Firefox, but for as much else as possible, Epiphany does an excellent job and doesn't stress my less-than-new hardware as much as Firefox.
If you run top in a terminal and keep an eye on the running processes, you'll see that Firefox hogs a lot of CPU and tends to keep hogging it even if you're not "actively" browsing. Other browsers, including (in my experience) Epiphany, Opera, Chrome/Chromium, Konqueror, Midori, Kazehakaze (and really just about anything that isn't Firefox) is much more forgiving of system resources than Firefox.
So it pays to shop around for browsers that do what you want yet don't stress your system so much.
Though it's not open-source, I do use Opera on my super-old systems, where it's light footprint makes even my 233 MHz system usable.
I've been pretty happy with Chromium in Ubuntu, and Chrome in Windows runs better now that I have 1 GB of RAM on the XP box (it didn't do so well with 512 MB).
But in GNOME, I've relied on Epiphany as my browser of choice for some time. I didn't find it slow when it was based on the Gecko engine, and now on Webkit it remains fast and functional.
The more I use GNOME, the more I gravitate toward the "GNOME apps," incluiding Epiphany, Evolution (which I've just started using with a couple IMAP mail accounts), the Empathy IM client, Rhythmbox, etc.
While I think the even-tighter integration of GNOME apps in the Ubuntu panel is theoretically a step in the right direction, I find that things are broken enough that the benefits of that integration aren't terrible available at present (but I hope they will be in future).
Note: In the past month or so, I've run GNOME in Debian Lenny, FreeBSD 7.3 and Ubuntus 8.04 and 10.04.





Recent Comments
Monstra on CMS and blog software without databases: Monstra CMS is the best flatfile CMS ever! (!) Easy to install, upgr ...
Chris on Running OpenBSD in a live environment with MarBSD-X : Jggimi isn't developing his images anymore. If you want an updated Ope ...
Peter Ljung on Review: DragonFlyBSD 3.0.1 -- the longest DragonFlyBSD review ever -- Part 5: Comparison to OpenBSD 5.0 and closing comments: I have also been fascinated by the Hammer file system and think it wou ...
Anonymous on Review: DragonFlyBSD 3.0.1 -- the longest DragonFlyBSD review ever -- Part 2: My BSDistory: Can you just get to the actual review? ...
Bill Callahan on SugarSync is working on a Linux client, but I'm not unhappy at all with Dropbox: I've been very happy with SpiderOak. It has a native Linux client as w ...
AJ on Debian Stable -- set it and forget it -- spoils me for fresh Linux Mint 12 on some very nice ZaReason hardware: Gnome 2 is still standard in the upcoming SolusOS (Currently at RC 2). ...
Niki Kovacs on Debian Stable -- set it and forget it -- spoils me for fresh Linux Mint 12 on some very nice ZaReason hardware: Since I've moved to Debian stable - with a few tweaks - I've not only ...
Earl on Debian Stable -- set it and forget it -- spoils me for fresh Linux Mint 12 on some very nice ZaReason hardware: I use Mint 12 and LMDE based on Debian testing. Both are plagued by G ...
Alan Rochester on Debian Stable -- set it and forget it -- spoils me for fresh Linux Mint 12 on some very nice ZaReason hardware: "mint does have a separate xfce edition afaik.." The Debian version o ...