Safari: January 2008 Archives
Let's get to it: I have one Web site that I work on infrequently that requires Internet Explorer, but since I barely have to do anything on it, I am free to use IE, or not.
And I waited at least a year to "upgrade" my IE6 to IE7 on the XP box at work. Yeah, it's an upgrade because now IE has tabbed browsing -- a feature Firefox has had for years, and which IE probably would've never added had FF not had it first.
I like IE6 because it was a fast program -- it opened fast and did the rest of its thing fast. And I could use it as an FTP client.
Now that I have IE7, sure there is tabbed browsing, and it looks a little better, but it's way slower than Firefox, and I pretty much only fire up IE for ONE Web site because it's at the top of my IE favorites and the bottom of my FF favorites.
IE loads more slowly, the favorites come up slower -- basically it gets beat by FF in performance by every measure. (I'm running a 3 GHz Pentium 4 with 512 MB of RAM.)
And I can run Firefox in Windows, Linux, BSD and Mac OS X ... and I do (though I'm partial to the Mozilla-derived Epiphany in the GNOME desktop, as well as the Seamonkey browser/e-mail client/HTML editor suite -- also based on Mozilla).
Truth be told, if it really bothered me, I'd try to roll the box back to IE6, if that indeed can be done. Since IE7 installs over your IE6, I think it might be a problem to "go back."
Note: While I can't get the same FTP functionality out of IE7, I have a Windows workaround: Open up My Computer from the Start menu, and type your FTP address in the search bar. The window functions pretty much like IE6 -- it's the same "Explorer"-like interface Windows uses to let you examine your own files, and it does FTP just like IE6. Thanks, Microsoft!
I used to think IE was the best browser for OS X, too -- that final version of IE5 for the Mac was a masterful, innovative application, and I'm sorry Microsoft abandoned it. Safari doesn't have enough critical mass to cut it -- many Web sites don't look so hot in it -- so Firefox is pretty much the browser of record for the Mac, too.
And Mozilla is making hand-over-fist money by getting a cut of the Google searches made through the browser. All it means is more money that Microsoft isn't making.
Hope you're happy, Microsoft!




Recent Comments
Steven Rosenberg on The Debian Mac needs more memory: I'd love to see how OpenBSD does on this hardware, but I just can't se ...
Joe on Long-lost Click: Wolvix again: I don't know if this is completely related to your Slackware-Grub issu ...
ric storms on The Debian Mac needs more memory: I think there has to be something screwy in my system BIOS on my Power ...
Steven Rosenberg on LogMeIn Free: It could be my application of the year: LogMeIn Free does everything I need, and you can't beat free. ...
techoftheday on LogMeIn Free: It could be my application of the year: LogMeIn is an awesome tool, but the free version is limited in terms o ...
Steven Rosenberg on Installing Fedora 9 on the Power Mac G4/466 — Part 2: The biggest problems for Linux and the PowerPC are: No Flash No Java ...
Steven Rosenberg on Installing Fedora 9 on the Power Mac G4/466 — Part 2: This Power Mac G4 is pretty vanilla. Nothing added beyond the default ...
ric storms on Installing Fedora 9 on the Power Mac G4/466 — Part 2: I have all but given up on Linux for my PowerPC. I've tried both Etch ...
Steven Rosenberg on Debian Lenny: It's an up-and-down thing: Thanks for the info on the RAM. Those Macs seem pretty darn sensitive ...