CentServer: December 2008 Archives
I was pleased as the proverbial punch to receive a link in the latest Distrowatch Weekly, and I didn't even have to stoop to my usual begging. (Thanks Caitlyn!)
What I also saw in the column was the announcement of a new distribution, CentServer, which is based on CentOS. For those who might not know, CentOS is itself a free clone of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
I've run CentOS as a desktop system, and lately especially (since 5.2) been extremely pleased.
But CentServer, and those behind it, care not. They want a SERVER OS, with none of the trimmings. No X (because real admins don't use X ... or is it because of the hit on performance?).
Here are CentServer's features:
- Optmized for server
- No X window
- Minimal server components included
- Automate installation support (without any interaction)
- 1 CD (384MB)
- Setup from scratch in 5 minutes
I like. A single CD, automatic install (although real server geeks like the fine-grained control you get in the Slackware installer, where you can choose what will install package by package). Five-minute setup — great for getting a box up quickly.
Here's another distro I'll be watching. I don't exactly know what makes it more secure than plain-vanilla CentOS, and I'd certainly like to find out.
CentServer's big problem: This might not be a problem for you (the global you) but it's a problem for me: CentServer is 64-bit only. It runs on both AMD and Intel 64-bit CPUs, but I don't have a single 64-bit CPU in my herd. ... OK I might have a old AMD laptop in the junk pile, but I'm not about to turn it into a server ...
About this blog
Recent Comments
Monstra on CMS and blog software without databases: Monstra CMS is the best flatfile CMS ever! (!) Easy to install, upgr ...
Chris on Running OpenBSD in a live environment with MarBSD-X : Jggimi isn't developing his images anymore. If you want an updated Ope ...
Peter Ljung on Review: DragonFlyBSD 3.0.1 -- the longest DragonFlyBSD review ever -- Part 5: Comparison to OpenBSD 5.0 and closing comments: I have also been fascinated by the Hammer file system and think it wou ...
Anonymous on Review: DragonFlyBSD 3.0.1 -- the longest DragonFlyBSD review ever -- Part 2: My BSDistory: Can you just get to the actual review? ...
Bill Callahan on SugarSync is working on a Linux client, but I'm not unhappy at all with Dropbox: I've been very happy with SpiderOak. It has a native Linux client as w ...
AJ on Debian Stable -- set it and forget it -- spoils me for fresh Linux Mint 12 on some very nice ZaReason hardware: Gnome 2 is still standard in the upcoming SolusOS (Currently at RC 2). ...
Niki Kovacs on Debian Stable -- set it and forget it -- spoils me for fresh Linux Mint 12 on some very nice ZaReason hardware: Since I've moved to Debian stable - with a few tweaks - I've not only ...
Earl on Debian Stable -- set it and forget it -- spoils me for fresh Linux Mint 12 on some very nice ZaReason hardware: I use Mint 12 and LMDE based on Debian testing. Both are plagued by G ...
Alan Rochester on Debian Stable -- set it and forget it -- spoils me for fresh Linux Mint 12 on some very nice ZaReason hardware: "mint does have a separate xfce edition afaik.." The Debian version o ...