A Bit About User Comments
On the online story about a man who planted a camera in his company's restroom so he could videotape a colleague, there was an interesting comment from a reader. Joe Public wrote: "Why does the Daily Breeze allow us to comment on sex crimes agains some Joe Smoe, but the editors decide against allowing the citizens to comment in regards to sex crimes against an elected public official (Medrano)? "
That's actually a pretty good question. Here's why: In sex crimes and those invovling minors, it is the Daily Breeze's policy (like most newspapers) to not identify the victim. However, we don't have control over what people write in the user comments section, and there was information that came very close to disclosing who Medrano's alleged victim is. Erring on the side of caution, we shut down the comments on that story - and didn't allow them on the follow-ups - to avoid this from happening in the high-profile, emotionally-charged case.
If someone were to disclose the name of the victim in the peeping Tom case, we'd do the same.
1 Comments
Leave a comment
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|



Every one remembers that life seems to be not cheap, nevertheless different people require money for different stuff and not every person earns enough cash. Hence to receive some loans or short term loan will be good way out.