Milford Zornes, who died at 100 in 2008 in Claremont, is the subject of an art exhibit and a biography by his son-in-law. A day ahead of what would have been his 110th birthday, I write about him in Wednesday’s column.
Significant layoffs, 20 percent or more, will fall in the coming weeks on the newsroom of the Daily Bulletin and the 10 other papers in the Southern California News Group. It’s been widely reported, so I feel comfortable in sharing that. The Times wrote a detailed account last week, which you can read here.
You might be asking: What can I do? Here’s what journalist Luis Gomez wrote:
Ken Doctor, like many journalism experts and practitioners, was recently asked about this conundrum: “What can citizens do?”
And like everyone else, he said what people should do is subscribe to a newspaper. It sounds self-serving, but it’s a simple question of economics. People vote with their wallets. If they don’t buy a subscription, they are essentially telling newspapers that they are not worth keeping around.
A lot of people are essentially telling us that, unfortunately. (I’ve lost track of how many people who recognize me then ask me if I still write for the newspaper.) And we’ve made it easy to tell us that by offering our product online largely for free as we, and other newspapers, tried to figure out whether increased readership would pay for itself via increased advertising. Turns out it, er, didn’t.
Now, I’m hesitant to tell people how they should spend their money, and I’m sensitive to the fact that, like other print publications, we’re charging you more for less content.
Still, paying for the news you’re getting seems only fair. We’re not working for free. A print subscription or a digital one is fine with us, whichever you prefer. It’s a relative bargain, in my eyes, and your support may keep us going. Even a reduced level of local news is better than no local news — right?
Home delivery price on our website is $25 for 28 days — that’s under $1 a day, and cheaper than the newsstand price, and comes with unlimited online access.
An online-only subscription is $10 for 28 days — that’s 28 cents a day, daily and Sunday. Why, that’s like 1970s pricing. You get unlimited access to our website and a web facsimile of each day’s paper, with the ability to read recent past issues. And the carrier won’t throw it under your car.
May we sign you up? Operators, as they used to say in the commercials, are standing by.
Above, a (slightly messy) view of a portion of our office; below, art on the wall of another room.
I wrote a column last month on a Paul R. Williams-designed home in Ontario. Then an opportunity arose to write about the architect’s only other Inland Valley structure, a former post office from 1926, also in Ontario. Local historians installed a plaque on the building last week to highlight its history. I attended and learned not only about the building but about the arts district downtown that has never really taken off, and why. That story is in Sunday’s column. (Also, I give someone the needle. It doesn’t really advance the story, but it felt good.)
I dropped into a Montclair City Council meeting Tuesday and was rewarded with great entertainment. Friday’s column tries to do justice to it. Above, a fresh coat of paint is applied Wednesday to the tower next to the 10 Freeway. (I was about to get on the freeway at Monte Vista, saw the activity and pulled over.)
85 Degrees C Bakery Cafe, 428 Auto Center Drive (at Indian Hill), Claremont; open daily
I’ve been to the Chinese bakery chain 85 Degrees (Celsius) in Chino Hills a few times, which will tell you I like it. One opened up in Claremont last fall, in the Super King center.
Even though I live in Claremont, my lone visit so far was not on my way to work or on a weekend but rather for a workday meal. I was headed to an interview in Claremont at 4 p.m. one day from our Rancho Cucamonga office and needed a quick lunch. It occurred to me that 85 Degrees was right off the freeway and wouldn’t take long.
It’s in a space in the middle of the center that previously housed a couple of Mediterranean restaurants in succession. I was skeptical of how this would work, given that the Chino Hills space is probably four times larger, and with a patio. But the selection of serve-yourself items is about the same size as in Chino Hills. There’s no cake display and far less seating.
I grabbed a tray and tongs and picked up, in clockwise order below, a wheat mushroom roll ($1.65), apple danish ($1.80), pork sung bun ($1.80) and spinach danish ($2), plus a sea salt jasmine tea ($3, not pictured because it arrived after I started eating), paid and took the lone table available. I felt bad taking a table for four, but it was that or eat standing up, and besides, I wasn’t there long.
As always, I liked my items, with the wheat mushroom roll my favorite and the pork sung bun the least. If there were more seating, I would visit more often.
An 85 Degrees opened in December in Rancho Cucamonga. Suddenly, they’re everywhere!
Remember the story of the neon dragon from outside Grauman’s Chinese Theatre that was being restored in Pomona? Well, as the photo above shows, it’s done. I got a peek during a private event Sunday and write about it for Wednesday’s column.
In Sunday’s column, I reflect on a year in reading — a year in which reading seemed more therapeutic than ever.
I made my way through 45 books in 2017. As always, it’s never enough — but I was glad to have read most of these, with only a couple of clunkers. They’re listed below in the order in which I read them, as pulled from my monthly Reading Log posts on this blog.
- “Mary Shelley: Her Life, Her Fiction, Her Monsters,” Anne K. Mellor
- “A Tramp Abroad,” Mark Twain
- “Wanted Man: In Search of Bob Dylan,” John Bauldie, ed.
- “A Working Man’s Apocrypha,” William Luvaas
- “The Variable Man,” Philip K. Dick
- “The Invisible Man,” H.G. Wells
- “Behold the Man,” Michael Moorcock
- “The Female Man,” Joanna Russ
- “Funny in Farsi,” Firoozeh Dumas
- “Wolf in White Van,” John Darnielle
- “Reading Comics,” Douglas Wolk
- “Bloodhounds on Broadway and Other Stories,” Damon Runyon
- “Reporters: Memoirs of a Young Newspaperman,” Will Fowler
- “The World of Jimmy Breslin,” Jimmy Breslin
- “You Know Me Al,” Ring Lardner
- “The Island of Fu Manchu,” Sax Rohmer
- “Treasure Island,” Robert Louis Stevenson
- “Treasure Island!!!,” Sara Levine
- “The Island of Dr. Moreau,” H.G. Wells
- “On Chesil Beach,” Ian McEwan
- “The Slide,” Kyle Beachy
- “Galactic Pot-Healer,” Philip K. Dick
- “Jose Clemente Orozco: Prometheus,” Pomona College Museum of Art, eds.
- “Seinfeldia: How a Show About Nothing Changed Everything,” Jennifer Keishin Armstrong
- “Julius Caesar,” William Shakespeare
- “Antony and Cleopatra,” William Shakespeare
- “From Bill, With Love,” Bill McClellan
- “The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay,” Michael Chabon
- “Rock ‘n’ Roll Billboards of the Sunset Strip,” Robert Landau
- “Slaughterhouse-Five,” Kurt Vonnegut
- “The Transmigration of Timothy Archer,” Philip K. Dick
- “Prometheus 2017: Four Artists From Mexico Revisit Orozco,” Rebecca McGrew and Terri Geis, eds.
- “How to Win a Pullet Surprise: The Pleasures and Pitfalls of Our Language,” Jack Smith
- “The Puppet Masters,” Robert Heinlein
- “The Toynbee Convector,” Ray Bradbury
- “One Hundred and Two H-Bombs,” Thomas M. Disch
- “The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath,” H.P. Lovecraft
- “Love Conquers All,” Robert Benchley
- “Hillbilly Elegy,” J.D. Vance
- “It Can’t Happen Here,” Sinclair Lewis
- “The Woody Allen Companion,” Stephen Spignesi
- “True Stories of Claremont, CA,” Hal Durian
- “Readings,” Michael Dirda
- “Born to Run,” Bruce Springsteen
- “Happiness is Warm Color in the Shade: a Biography of Artist Milford Zornes,” Hal Baker
As usual I read more fiction than nonfiction, a couple of recent books, a few things for work and a lot of older books, both in when they were published or in when I acquired them. Any year in which you read two Shakespeare plays is going to be a pretty good year. How was your own year in reading?
Friday’s column ties up a few loose ends regarding filming in La Verne of “The Graduate” and “Wayne’s World 2,” while also offering a Culture Corner and a Valley Vignette.
Taco King, 1317 E. Foothill Blvd. (at Alta), Upland; open Monday to Saturday 8 a.m. to 9 p.m., closed Sundays
If I understand the history properly, this location was once Taka Taco (take a taco) and became Taco King in 1975. It’s a square standalone building in east Upland with a marvelous image in neon of a guy in a sombrero and serape leaning against a cactus and, elsewhere on the sign, an uninspiring motto, “Home of the Bean Special.”
I have never been tempted to order the bean special, whatever it is, but I have eaten at Taco King a few times over the years. It never struck me as exceptional. But I had a surprisingly good burrito there in October. I didn’t take any photographs except of the exterior because I was sure I’d written about Taco King here before.
Wrong! A search of this blog revealed that I hadn’t. So the next chance I had, I went back and ordered the same thing, pictured above, a combination burrito with carne asada ($6.05). It was light on the beef, which would bother some, but the stew-like filling was, dare I say it, more traditional. The first time I got it as a combo (a combination burrito combo?) with chips and a drink ($9.20).
You order and pick up from a window, where they’ll place squeeze bottles of red and green salsa on your tray. (It’d be great if they also handed out copies of the Sinclair Lewis novel “It Can’t Happen Here,” but no, I brought that with me.)
The small dining room is done in pastels. the wall art includes Mexican currency mounted inside a frame, and a few photos show the place as Taka Taco and then Taco King, labeled with the year.
Was anything here prior to Taka Taco, or was it the original occupant? Inquiring minds want to know.
Taco King has tacos, of course, for $1.90, soft or hard, with carnitas, pastor, asada, chicken, beef and cabeza (head meat), plus burritos, taquitos, burgers, nachos, menudo and breakfast items. It currently has a middle of the road 3 stars on Yelp, the usual split-the-difference rating between those who love it and those who say they threw their food away.
Three stars is about right, though: solidly good. But I have newfound respect for the place. While there’s nothing hip or trendy about Taco King, and the overall look and style may veer closer to Del Taco than Tacos Mexico, when was the last time you had cabeza or menudo at Del Taco?