The latest on Rafael Furcal: No news is bad news

| | Comments (0) |

The Dodgers appear to be at an impasse with representatives for Rafael Furcal. From what I understand, the club is offering a shorter contract at a lower salary than what Furcal is looking for, with a lot of incentives/bonuses based on Furcal's ability to stay in the lineup -- something he wasn't able to do this year -- and stay healthy -- something he wasn't able to do either of the past two seasons. Furcal and his people apparently aren't interested in an incentive-based contract. They want a four-year guarantee at something in the neighborhood of the $13 million average annual value Furcal had on his just-expired contract with the Dodgers. Meanwhile, the Dodgers' reason for not offering Furcal arbitration is fairly simple. Players are guaranteed to take no more than a 20-percent pay cut in arbitration, which means that if Furcal had accepted (something Dodgers officials felt there was at least some chance he would do), he would have been guaranteed at least $10.4 million in 2009 (he made $13 million in 2008). But that 20-percent paycut limit is really kind of a joke, because players ALMOST ALWAYS increase their salary through aribtration no matter what kind of year they had. That means had the Dodgers offered Furcal arbitration and had he accepted, they probably could have expected to pay him AT LEAST $15 million in 2009. And that's on top of the $4 million in deferred money they already have to pay him next month as part of his previous contract. ...

The lunch between Dodgers' and City of Glendale public-relations reps earlier today had been scheduled far in advance and had nothing to do with naming rights, a largely political controversy that will have little impact on the baseball side of things. As one Dodgers official I spoke with rightly pointed out, none of this really means anything other than semantics. Oh, and one thing I said in my previous post apparently is wrong. Camelback Road is NOT the boundary between Glendale and Phoenix, at least not in the part of town where the complex will be. The complex is actually IN Phoenix, but on land OWNED BY the City of Glendale. Got a headache yet? Good thing I still have two months to figure out what dateline to use.

Leave a comment

Scores, stats and more

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Tony Jackson published on December 2, 2008 3:51 PM.

The latest on the Glendale naming game was the previous entry in this blog.

Dodgers' holiday caravan begins today is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en

Advertisement

Other blogs

Our Daily Dread: The state of your newspaper's sports section, from somewhere on the inside in Farther Off the Wall
On the road again in Inside UCLA with Brian Dohn
Boys Basketball: Big All-Star game planned for Juniors in Daily News High School Spotlight
Morning Buzz in Inside USC with Scott Wolf
Chivas USA-San Jose Earthquakes Highlights in 100 Percent Soccer