Some early thoughts from the Burbank smoking ban debate at City Hall tonight:
For Jessicka Martinez, a proposed ordinance forcing smokers butt out in public areas would spell an end to usual break-time ritual.
“It’s nonsense,” she said Tuesday, puffing away on a cigarette on the sidewalk outside a downtown hair salon where she works. “We’re in a public area. We’re outside. I’m not smoking around people. It’s not a bad as a problem as exhaust from cars.”
Calabasas city Councilman Barry Groveman told the council the fears about negative impacts _ whether it’s a lost of business or noncompliance _ when his city enacted a smoking ban, did not come to past.
“You might hear the sky is falling,” he said. “I’m here to tell you the sky is up, the sky is blue and the air is clean.
“There is no smoking police. The businesses are complying. They have the ability to create smoking areas, and in many cases, many have chosen not to do it. … Not one person has come before our council last year to complain.”
“My 4 ½ year old daughter hates smoke,” said Eric Michael Cap, one of the ban’s prime proponents. “She’s bothered by it. I believe we have a moral responsibility to protect those who can’t protect themselves.”
Amy Weyand, a Burbank resident for 25 years said she is allergic to cigarette smoke and supports the ordinance.
“If you stand in line in the theater, people are allowed to smoke,” Weyand said. “Smoke in your house and smoke in the car, that’s my feeling.”
The council entered deliberation at about 11 a.m. after some three hours of public testimony. Mayor Todd Campbell and Councilman Jef Vander Borght are for it, Marsha Ramos and David Golonski are looking for a compromise; David Gordon was disputing the ordinance while expressing willingness to compromise.
Updated 12 a.m. Wednesday:
The best bit of entertainment came when Campbell, the enviromental lobbyist, locked horns with Gordon _ and out-Gordon the good doctor by citing scientific studies that concluded secondhand smoke is a health hazard. Gordon wasn't sure there was enough evidence on the dangers of secondhand smoke with respect to outdoor areas. Usually it's Gordon citing the studies and past decisions, especially in land use.
Or maybe Campbell, with only a month left in office before stepping down, just wanted to go out with a bang.