Immigration and Animal Shelters?

| | Comments (0) |

No matter what the issue, here in Southern California, there is always an immigration angle to be found. As a case in point, allow me to present the following transcription of a voice mail I received this morning from a self-described animal "rescuer" who was none too happy about today's Daily News editorial on the efficacy of "no-kill" rules at L.A. animal shelters:

"The overcrowding at the shelter is due to our people that are coming here to this country. OK, now I don't want to sound like a bigot, but I'm laying it right where it is. We have people coming in here that don't treat animals the way they should be treated. And they are letting them breed. They don't care because they themselves don't watch how much they populate. OK? And that's one of the major problems. They toss off animals, they discard them. We have situations where they get tired of them, 'Oh, we'll just take them to the shelter. Oh They're too old. They can't play. We don't want them any more.' That's what is really happening....

"Other cities have no-kill policies, and they've worked fine. They just won't work in L.A., that I pretty much agree with, because of our inept system here and because of all the immigrants that we have here who don't give a rat's you-know-what about animals That's the reason why we have a big problem here..."

Get past all the vitriol, and I don't doubt there's some truth here: Where there are more people, there will be more pets and pet-related problems. Likewise, many Third World countries, as a whole, don't share our "enlightened" approach to animals -- for better (they don't deify their pets) and for worse (they do enjoy cock-fighting). Here, as with any number of social issues, when different cultures butt up against each other, there will be some friction.

But what I find particularly interesting about this angry rant is that, generally, we consider pro-animal rights to be a lefty position, and anti-immigration to be a righty one. Yet here the two converge -- as they do, occasionally, among certain environmental and overpopulation types -- in a shared sense of misanthropy.

Leave a comment

Friendly Fire comments

Due to the huge amount of spam, commenters on Friendly Fire must now register with the site and sign in to leave a comment.

Creating a Movable Type commenting account is easy: After you click on the "comments" link in a blog post (or are already in an individual blog entry), click "sign in." When you are at the Movable Type "sign-in to comment" screen, after the words "Not a member?" click "Sign up!"

You will be asked for a minimal amount of information, including an e-mail address, which we need to verify the account.

If you sign up and for some reason don't get a return e-mail confirming your new account, please e-mail Steven Rosenberg at steven.rosenberg@
dailynews.com, and he will activate your account and notify you. He can also help you with any other issues regarding signing up for or leaving comments on the blog.

Tip: To ensure that you receive the confirmation e-mail when you do sign up to comment on the blog, BEFORE you sign up, put the e-mail address online@langnews.com in your mail program's address book. That way, the message from the server to confirm your account won't get lost in your spam file.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Chris Weinkopf published on December 10, 2007 10:55 AM.

Lone Gunmen and Social Gunmen was the previous entry in this blog.

Signs that Obama's on the ascendency? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

Advertisement

Other blogs

Uniform Tweak in Inside USC with Scott Wolf
Rambis interests T-Wolves in Inside the Lakers
Ask Jim Fox, 2009 in Inside the Kings
Tuesday's Column: The Beckham Experiment (Chapter 3) in 100 Percent Soccer
Giving communities power over schools in The Sausage Factory