Anyone but McCain?

| | Comments (0) |

While I wouldn't go far as Rob, and describe Hugh Hewitt as "America's least intellectually honest pundit" (only because there are so many others vying for that title), I have always found Hewitt to be as predictably partisan as anyone in the business. Hugh believes whatever the GOP believes; and any time a Republican and Democrat disagree on something -- even if it's only what to have for breakfast -- in Hugh's mind, the Republican is right, the Democrat is wrong. Hugh seems to have replaced his political and moral compass with sheer party calculation.

And that makes interesting this presidential primary season, where Hewitt now has to choose between Republicans. Naturally, he chooses the party establishment's candidate, Mitt Romney. And naturally, he turns his outwardly cordial, but ruthless-nonetheless attacks against other Republicans. His top target these days is John McCain, who may be leading the GOP primaries, but is decidedly not the party establishment's candidate.

So Hugh cheerleads about the "ABM Treaty" -- which stands for "Anyone But McCain." But this exposes how little his convictions matter compared to his partisan loyalties.

In fairness, I have my concerns about McCain, too -- any conservative would -- which is why I tend to prefer Huckabee. But are McCain's deviations from conservative orthodoxy really worse than Rudy Giuliani's affinity for abortion? Or Ron Paul's racist affiliations? Is it really in the party's interest to get anyone but McCain when such noxious characters are still in the race?

Hugh's ABM crowd gets downright loopy in its hatred for McCain, the skunk at the GOP lawn party. The other day, Hugh's show had on as a guest Rick Santorum leading the "ABM" chorus. Santorum says McCain is "very, very dangerous for Republicans..... There’s nothing worse than having a Democratic Congress and a Republican president who would act like a Democrat in matters that are important to conservatives.”

This, by the way, comes from the guy who went around Pennsylvania campaigning for Arlen Specter.

But this is how things work for Hugh and the ABM crowd. The Party comes first -- even before the ideals that supposedly animate it.

On second thought, maybe Rob's right about Hugh after all ...

Leave a comment

Friendly Fire comments

Due to the huge amount of spam, commenters on Friendly Fire must now register with the site and sign in to leave a comment.

Creating a Movable Type commenting account is easy: After you click on the "comments" link in a blog post (or are already in an individual blog entry), click "sign in." When you are at the Movable Type "sign-in to comment" screen, after the words "Not a member?" click "Sign up!"

You will be asked for a minimal amount of information, including an e-mail address, which we need to verify the account.

If you sign up and for some reason don't get a return e-mail confirming your new account, please e-mail Steven Rosenberg at steven.rosenberg@dailynews.com, and he will activate your account and notify you. He can also help you with any other issues regarding signing up for or leaving comments on the blog.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Chris Weinkopf published on January 16, 2008 9:05 AM.

Congratulations, Daily Kos, on your Mitt victory was the previous entry in this blog.

Principled Partisanship? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

Powered by Movable Type 4.1

Advertisement

Other blogs

It's a snap in Inside UCLA with Brian Dohn
Baron Davis: Out one week in Inside the Clippers
HS FOOT POLL: Which underdog has the best chance to score an upset this Friday? in Daily News High School Spotlight
Left hand, meet right hand in Inside the Kings
Answer Monday! Round 10 in Inside USC with Scott Wolf