Guns & SCOTUS

| | Comments (1) |

What strikes me as amusing about the Supreme Court's split ruling on gun ownership -- and the predictable responses to it -- is this:

Why is that people who are convinced that the Constitution guarantees a right to abortion, despite its never mentioning the subject, are generally the same people who believe the Constitution doesn't protect a right to bear arms -- even though it articulates one explicitly?

1 Comments

David Fiorella said:

Good and excellent point Chris!

THE most corrupted; crime ridden and murderous areas where criminals are free at will is urban areas that herald "comprehensive gun-control laws".

Example: Alameda County area known as Oakland's "Dogtown" a gun-control; crime ridden area known for murders, robberies, street prostitution, pimping, drug buys and sells, rapes and child molestations.

Gun-control laws hinder the law abiding while shielding the criminals through the ACLU; leftwing attorney types. That would be another subject; however!@

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Chris Weinkopf published on June 27, 2008 9:52 AM.

Summer Time and the Liv'n Ain't Easy Without Russert & Carlin was the previous entry in this blog.

Guns & the Court is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

David Fiorella on Guns & SCOTUS: Good and excellent point Chris! THE most corrupted; crime ridden ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.1