Gail-T's Nobamarama, continued.

| | Comments (1) |

Jonathan and I have both argued that it's a red herring to say that Obama is scary because he's liberal by the standards of the stodgy, conservative U.S. Senate.

By contrast, Gail-Tzipporah says here that "It doesn't matter how many leftist bills get passed through Senate, Rob. What matters and what scares the bejeezus out of me most is that we may be on the verge of electing a leftist President who will then pass leftist bills. If I wanted a leftist regime, I would have moved to Russia when it was in the throes of communism or Cuba long ago."

My initial reaction involves wondering whether Gail-Tzipporah had strong feelings against the hoarding of executive power by Bush and Cheney over the past eight years - an accumulation of power that seemed to negate the Founding Fathers' intent on checks and balances.

During those years, I've asked my Republican friends if they could hold to a Golden Rule about executive power: "Will you still support a strong executive concept once Hillary is in power?" Their disingenuous answer was, "Sure, especially if she uses it for the noble purposes that Bush and Cheney for which intend to use it."

Well... Now the American public is on the verge of electing someone that many Republicans are convinced is a commie. Looks like you'll have to live with communism, then, because you set up the rules this way.

For my part, I just don't buy the idea that Obama is a communist or even a hard leftist, or that he has the ability to push through a radical agenda, even through a 62-member Democratic majority.

***

A Republican friend of mine quibbled a few years ago with how so many liberals were complaining about how Bush would suspend the Constitution and impose wartime emergency rule that crushed all civil liberties. This friend argued that this was a psychological projection on the part of liberals, who he felt were quite inclined to using coercive power (think of PC rules, for example).

Maybe. But the shoe's now on the other foot. Staunch Republicans are writing on message boards that "you're going to need to hold on to your guns, gold and ammo if Obama is elected." It's a similar, overreacting psychological projection

As for Obama's associations, apparently nothing I can say will convince you that he's a sane person, and I imagine that nothing you can say will make me take seriously that he's a commie pacifist rat.

And I'm not sure whether Gail-T is as prone as I to quibble with Palin's church crowd or with her husband's associations.

What could be more "un-American" than a substantial public association by both of them with an AIP group that is split between die-hard secessionists and subtle secessionists? I guess this conversation is a non-starter, though, because some people will always see Apple Pie Sarah as all-American, even if she has publicly, on video, supported those who want "out" of America.

1 Comments

Gail-Tzipporah Saunders said:

I just had an idea, Rob. Choose Larry Elder as a write-in candidate.

But in all seriousness, I think that this economic mess started because there wasn't enough of a system of checks and balances for the banks and lending institutions. Even King Obama was allegedly in on it when he worked as a "community organizer" and legal representative for ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now). Not only have seven of their workers admitted to registering 2,000 voters illegally, (I know. Obama didn't know) but he allegedly pressured banks into giving loans to people who didn't qualify. (He probably didn't know about that one, either, or was it that he called the banks in his sleep?)

Owning property is a privilege not a right. And if it wasn't for everyone's lack of common sense and foresight, then we probably wouldn't be in this jam to begin with.

That's why it's too bad Larry Elder's not running, He would have straightened things out, and I wouldn't be thinking about what to pack if Obama wins.

Leave a comment

Friendly Fire comments

Due to the huge amount of spam, commenters on Friendly Fire must now register with the site and sign in to leave a comment.

Creating a Movable Type commenting account is easy: After you click on the "comments" link in a blog post (or are already in an individual blog entry), click "sign in." When you are at the Movable Type "sign-in to comment" screen, after the words "Not a member?" click "Sign up!"

You will be asked for a minimal amount of information, including an e-mail address, which we need to verify the account.

If you sign up and for some reason don't get a return e-mail confirming your new account, please e-mail Steven Rosenberg at steven.rosenberg@
dailynews.com, and he will activate your account and notify you. He can also help you with any other issues regarding signing up for or leaving comments on the blog.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Rob Asghar published on October 31, 2008 4:14 PM.

An Irony Free Time was the previous entry in this blog.

Why America is "Going Socialist" is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

Gail-Tzipporah Saunders on Gail-T's Nobamarama, continued.: I just had an idea, Rob. Choose Larry Elder as a write-in candidate. ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.1

Advertisement

Other blogs

AFI Fest - Che premiere in The Reel Deal
SNL Video: Fey back as Palin...joined by the real John McCain... in Out in Hollywood
Stat Pad in Inside USC with Scott Wolf
Olson update in Inside UCLA with Brian Dohn
Injury updates in Inside the Clippers