Wave the White Flag in the Limbaugh War

| | Comments (4) |


President Obama and the Democrats should wave the white flag in their strawman war on Rush Limbaugh. The Media Research Center delivered the grim casualty figures for the Democrats. Since January, the top talk show gabber's ratings have soared off the charts. Radio affiliates that carry Limbaugh's syndicated show call the ratings boost he's gotten from the Democrat's orchestrated attack on him a "dramatic surge." This writer predicted as much when President Obama cracked to Congressional Republicans in late January that they should knock off listening to Limbaugh if they expected to get anything done in Congress and with his administration.

The gabber instantly snatched at the quip and turned it into a multi show bonanza. No matter what topic Limbaugh gassed on, he managed to slide in a reference to Obama's prop up of him as the Democrat's prize punching bag. This did three things. It gave him an even bigger pile of fodder to puff himself up as the emperor of talk radio, claim to be the real kingmaker in the GOP, and in a perverse way paint himself as a credible and thoughtful political critic. It snapped many shell shocked Congressional Republicans out of their post election funk. Now suddenly feisty and combative, they draw a deep line in the sand against any and everything that Obama proposed. And it stiffened the spines of many timid Republicans and made them determined not to be bullied, or at least appear not to be bullied, by a mere talk show host into standing up to Obama.
This should have been the red flag warning to the Democrats to drop Limbaugh from their enemies rolodex. But no, they continued to blunder on. They took out ads, radio spots, and email blasts bashing and trashing bogeyman Limbaugh. The idea was to make sure that when the public thought GOP, they thought Limbaugh.

This was even more grist for Limbaugh. An he went on a tear. In quick succession he picked a fight with Republican National Committee chair Michael Steele, Newt Gingrich, a handful of GOP accomodationists, and the usual suspect to him liberal Democratic interest groups. But the real payoff was that it let him pad his bully pulpit to further whip up the pack to nit pick, poke fun at, and blow up any and every alleged slip or misstep by Obama. This in turn added even more steam to his inflammatory campaign of rumors, half truths, distortions, and flat out lies about Obama, liberals, and just about any other issue he rants on.

Any other time this might be fun and games stuff, a side show distraction that bored reporters and TV talking heads used to fill up column space or a talk cast on off a slow news day, but the Democrats just couldn't let it go. And that insured that the Limbaugh as Democrat's foil ploy would continue to have shelve life.

Limbaugh in a phony self-deprecating moment mockingly minimized his importance as a radio talk show host, feigning puzzlement at why the Democrats were so obsessed with him. He was right. They never should have been. Obama didn't need him to get Congressional Democrats and whipsaw a few Republicans into backing his program and to approve his cabinet appointees. He still doesn't. And that's all the more reason to wave the white flag in the Limbaugh war.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His weekly radio show, "The Hutchinson Report" can be heard weekly in Los Angeles on KTYM Radio 1460 AM and nationally on blogtalkradio.com

4 Comments

Diane Schrader Author Profile Page said:

I'd be very interested to hear you detail the "flat out lies about Obama, liberals" etc. that Rush Limbaugh "rants on" about.

I don't think he offers a whole lot in the way of rumors, half-truths, or distortions, either, but that's more open to interpretation I suppose.

But let's talk flat out lies. Name 'em.

David Long Author Profile Page said:

I think any bump in the polls The Hindenburg like Rush Limbaugh might be enjoying is caused by a curiosity factor where more liberal types (anyone to the left of Hitler)are tuning in more in a, watching two monkeys do it in a barrel, kind of way. That gets old real fast.

Rob Asghar Author Profile Page said:

I'll leave it to Earl to document flat-out lies. My main difference with Earl is to point out that the Democratic Party operatives aren't mounting a campaign to deflate Limbaush's wallet, they're mounting a campaign to portray obstinate GOPsters as beholden to Limbaugh. If this causes a, uh, talk-radio bubble that inflates Rush's wallet in the short term, they're happy to live with that.

canaryinthecoalmine Author Profile Page said:

Interesting Earl, your silence. I hope you're researching many sources instead of just the Left, like some do who blog the Huff, etc. I say this with respect for your incredible smarts and chutzpah in many areas, yet, it is not enough to be just intelligent, one must have heart, passion, a code of morals/ethics that are well, supra-human. Otherwise, humanity fails to rise above the morass of evil.

Leave a comment

Friendly Fire comments

Due to the huge amount of spam, commenters on Friendly Fire must now register with the site and sign in to leave a comment.

Creating a Movable Type commenting account is easy: After you click on the "comments" link in a blog post (or are already in an individual blog entry), click "sign in." When you are at the Movable Type "sign-in to comment" screen, after the words "Not a member?" click "Sign up!"

You will be asked for a minimal amount of information, including an e-mail address, which we need to verify the account.

If you sign up and for some reason don't get a return e-mail confirming your new account, please e-mail Steven Rosenberg at steven.rosenberg@
dailynews.com, and he will activate your account and notify you. He can also help you with any other issues regarding signing up for or leaving comments on the blog.

Tip: To ensure that you receive the confirmation e-mail when you do sign up to comment on the blog, BEFORE you sign up, put the e-mail address online@langnews.com in your mail program's address book. That way, the message from the server to confirm your account won't get lost in your spam file.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Earl Ofari Hutchinson published on March 28, 2009 8:56 AM.

I'm all in a Huff was the previous entry in this blog.

Give 'em an olive branch, they'll chop down the tree. is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

canaryinthecoalmine on Wave the White Flag in the Limbaugh War: Interesting Earl, your silence. I hope you're researching many sources ...

Rob Asghar on Wave the White Flag in the Limbaugh War: I'll leave it to Earl to document flat-out lies. My main difference w ...

David Long on Wave the White Flag in the Limbaugh War: I think any bump in the polls The Hindenburg like Rush Limbaugh might ...

Diane Schrader on Wave the White Flag in the Limbaugh War: I'd be very interested to hear you detail the "flat out lies about Oba ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

Advertisement

Other blogs

Uniform Tweak in Inside USC with Scott Wolf
Rambis interests T-Wolves in Inside the Lakers
Ask Jim Fox, 2009 in Inside the Kings
Tuesday's Column: The Beckham Experiment (Chapter 3) in 100 Percent Soccer
Giving communities power over schools in The Sausage Factory