Trends

| | Comments (4) |

Going back to political trends, I think this is a credible assessment from the liberal Center for American Progress -- and it addresses long-term issues that aren't being addressed or even acknowledged by American conservatives.

Today, more than two-thirds of Americans rate a "progressive" approach to politics favorably, a 25-point increase in favorability over the last five years, with gains coming primarily from those who were previously unaware of the term. "Progressive" now equals "conservative" in terms of overall public favorability (67 percent, respectively). The continuing strength of the conservative brand--if not all of its constitutive ideas--reflects the long-term success of the conservative movement over decades. Despite electoral setbacks and larger proportions of Americans now adhering to progressive ideas about governance and society, the conservative worldview remains appealing to many Americans and creates important cleavages in the electorate, particularly on key cultural and national security beliefs....

But unless and until conservatives recognize the depth of affinity between President Obama's ideological approach and that of the American electorate, conservative ideas likely will remain in secondary status... Notably, the ideological areas of greatest consensus among Americans are all key priorities and investment targets of President Obama: renewable energy; education, science, and infrastructure; universal health care; financial support for the least well-off; public interest regulations; and reductions in inequality financed by increased taxes on the wealthy...

[P]rogressive attitudes about government and economics are particularly strong among those under the age of 30, suggesting the potential for further strengthening of progressivism within the electorate.

I know it may be hard for some of you to buy that Americans worry about the poor or about income inequality, but you again have to go back to the polling that shows that even the majority of America's wealthy are willing to pay higher taxes in order to address the issues mentioned above.

And this piece above doesn't even give much attention to an emerging culture of environmental stewardship among the millennials, which is boring or anathema to today's conservatives and libertarians. Again, these kids may change drastically in ten years, but given the shake-up of the economy and their short-term prospects, they may go on to create a radically different culture than that of their more conservative parents.

4 Comments

Diane Schrader Author Profile Page said:

Uh...yeah. Right on. See my comment on your GOP un-tilt piece.

gregb Author Profile Page said:

Really? Then why did 66 percent of those voting in "progressive" California turn down opportunities to raise taxes on all for the services consumed by few?

Americans may favor some government intervention. But cost-effective, effective government services. Neither of which are there in Washington or Sacramento.

Diane Schrader Author Profile Page said:

Exactly. Been to the DMV lately?

Craig Griffith Author Profile Page said:

1. Progressivism does not necessarily mean simply tax hikes to fix budget concerns.
2. The props in CA have to do with public education and health care, which are services consumed by many Californians.
3. Prop 1F was a measure to prohibit legislator pay increases in deficit years.
4. No matter how "progressive" they are, the general public at large will rarely vote for any measure they think will increase their taxes.
5. Just because these props were defeated does not mean "progressives" don't care about the services the props were supporting, just that they don't care for the way they were going about it.

Leave a comment

Friendly Fire comments

Due to the huge amount of spam, commenters on Friendly Fire must now register with the site and sign in to leave a comment.

Creating a Movable Type commenting account is easy: After you click on the "comments" link in a blog post (or are already in an individual blog entry), click "sign in." When you are at the Movable Type "sign-in to comment" screen, after the words "Not a member?" click "Sign up!"

You will be asked for a minimal amount of information, including an e-mail address, which we need to verify the account.

If you sign up and for some reason don't get a return e-mail confirming your new account, please e-mail Steven Rosenberg at steven.rosenberg@
dailynews.com, and he will activate your account and notify you. He can also help you with any other issues regarding signing up for or leaving comments on the blog.

Tip: To ensure that you receive the confirmation e-mail when you do sign up to comment on the blog, BEFORE you sign up, put the e-mail address online@langnews.com in your mail program's address book. That way, the message from the server to confirm your account won't get lost in your spam file.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Rob Asghar published on May 19, 2009 6:00 PM.

A GOP un-tilt was the previous entry in this blog.

More on the Private Hector is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

Craig Griffith on Trends: 1. Progressivism does not necessarily mean simply tax hikes to fix bu ...

Diane Schrader on Trends: Exactly. Been to the DMV lately? ...

gregb on Trends: Really? Then why did 66 percent of those voting in "progressive" Calif ...

Diane Schrader on Trends: Uh...yeah. Right on. See my comment on your GOP un-tilt piece. ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

Advertisement

Other blogs

Cole Of The Day in Inside USC with Scott Wolf
Rambis interests T-Wolves in Inside the Lakers
Ask Jim Fox, 2009 in Inside the Kings
Tuesday's Column: The Beckham Experiment (Chapter 3) in 100 Percent Soccer
Giving communities power over schools in The Sausage Factory