Afghanistan Cannot Be Won & We Dare Not Lose Against Al Qaeda

| | Comments (0) |

Earl's political analysis of our deteriorating situation in Afghanistan is insightful and correct. The political perils are indeed grave. But beyond that what of our strategic and military prospects? Is Obama's policy a brave but risky operation that could lead to a better world? Is this a profile in courage? Yes. Is it also a profile in folly? Probably.

The question in Afghanistan is not: Should we beat the Taliban? Though that is what it seems to have become. The questions are: Can we beat the Taliban, and are they our most important enemy? We cannot beat the Taliban--without utterly destroying human life at levels we will not accept. And bad as they are, complicit in fighting us as they are, our enemy, against whom we cannot allow ourselves to lose, is Al Qaeda.

Conflating the Taliban and Al Qaeda is as serious an error as Bush's conflation of Saddam and Al Qaeda. There is no plausible path that leads us to anything that could even vaguely be defined as victory. The Taliban are indigenous--and they are tribal, political, religious and ethnic. They are not all our sworn enemies...yet. But we're working on it.

We are, by not carefully distinguishing between the Taliban and Al Qaeda and among the various brands and branches of Taliban, pushing them together. They are uniting amongst themselves and with Al Qaeda to fight us. We are also pushing them east into what was the semi sanctuary of western Pakistan in Swat and Wazirastan. Together they are further destabilizing Pakistan. This is a very bad thing.

The prize and the peril are in Pakistan. With a large and politically powerful military, with a weak and corrupt government and with 85 to 100 nuclear bombs, their fate is critically important to us and the world--not to mention India. Those nukes in the wrong hands, in Al Qaeda hands would be the worst news the world could get. Worse, even than a nuclear Iran--also not a great prospect.

Iran, unlike Al Qaeda, is a nation with cities, factories and universities. They may be bad players on the world's stage but they have not, so far, been, suicidal. They use agents and arm puppets to do their destructive acts. Yes, they want hegemony over the region but they are happy to arm agents to fight, bomb and subvert other governments and the State of Israel.

The same cannot be said of Al Qaeda. They are stateless, have no good return address and are suicidal as well as indiscriminately homicidal. They are radically portable, so saying that they are in Afghanistan or Pakistan, while true at the moment, doesn't mean very much. Not being a state, they franchise and can move anywhere. 9-11 did not happen because of hooded terrorists swinging on monkey bars in Afghanistan. It happened because grievance and terror are portable. Egyptians and Saudis studying in Germany, pilots taking lessons in our Mid West, Florida and San Diego were on those planes. The money came from Saudi Arabia.

We need to focus on Al Qaeda wherever they are. We don't need massive armies; we need international cooperation. The Saudis are beginning to understand that the Faustian bargain they made with Al Qaeda is coming back to bite them. With the assassination attempt at the royal prince in charge of anti-terrorism last week and considerable unrest in the royal family itself, they are seeing that they cannot buy off their radicals by giving them money and sending them abroad.

The gathering threat of Iran to the Sunni and Arab World is putting them in a mood to help--to help in calming things with Israel and create a united front in facing Iran.

These are complex and perilous times. There are, however, opportunities to unite in fighting the clearest threats and dangers. These are not the Taliban or the assorted tribes and ethnicities in Afghanistan. Al Qaeda and Iran are center stage for the foreseeable future.

©2009 Jonathan Dobrer
www.Dobrer.org

Leave a comment

Friendly Fire comments

Due to the huge amount of spam, commenters on Friendly Fire must now register with the site and sign in to leave a comment.

Creating a Movable Type commenting account is easy: After you click on the "comments" link in a blog post (or are already in an individual blog entry), click "sign in." When you are at the Movable Type "sign-in to comment" screen, after the words "Not a member?" click "Sign up!"

You will be asked for a minimal amount of information, including an e-mail address, which we need to verify the account.

If you sign up and for some reason don't get a return e-mail confirming your new account, please e-mail Steven Rosenberg at steven.rosenberg@
dailynews.com, and he will activate your account and notify you. He can also help you with any other issues regarding signing up for or leaving comments on the blog.

Tip: To ensure that you receive the confirmation e-mail when you do sign up to comment on the blog, BEFORE you sign up, put the e-mail address online@langnews.com in your mail program's address book. That way, the message from the server to confirm your account won't get lost in your spam file.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jonathan Dobrer published on August 30, 2009 3:28 PM.

Afghanistan is Obama's Vietnam was the previous entry in this blog.

The Fire This Time is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

Advertisement

Other blogs

HS FOOT: Touted Oaks Christian readies for debut in Daily News High School Spotlight
Who's No. 1? This kid, when it comes to to knowing the Lakers' numbers in Farther Off the Wall
Will AP Correct This Correction Correctly? in 100 Percent Soccer
Burfict Eligible in Inside USC with Scott Wolf
Pregame: Dodgers vs. Padres in Inside the Dodgers