Flesh Club case goes back to trial court

If you’re tracking the City of San Bernardino’s legal actions against the Flesh Club, you’ll be interested in a state Supreme Court decision Thursday that sends the issue over $1.4 million in lost profits back to the trial courts. Staff Writer Andrew Edwards tackled the issue for The Sun.

4:03 p.m.: CA Supreme Court reverses decision that city owes Flesh Club owners $1.4 million

By Andrew Edwards, Staff Writer
Article Launched: 04/24/2008 04:07:15 PM PDT

SAN BERNARDINO – The California Supreme Court today reversed an appellate court’s decision that the city owed the Flesh Club’s owners $1.4 million in lost profits.

The Supreme Court’s action did not put an end to the case. Instead, the case is headed back to trial court and attorneys for both sides predicted they could win in that venue.

“We’re in better shape now,” City Attorney James F. Penman said.

The legal battle goes back to 1995. Then, City Hall obtained a court order in San Bernardino Superior Court to block nude dancing at Flesh Club, which is on Hospitality Lane.

However, that order was later dissolved and a jury eventually awarded Manta Management Corp. $1.4 million in lost profits, as nude dancing was blocked at Flesh Club from 1995 to 1999 during legal proceedings. The damages were based on the notion that the city could be held liable since the ordinance that functioned as the basis of the 1995 court order was judged to be unconstitutional.

But the state Supreme Court found that it was the 1995 court order itself, rather than the city’s law, that shut down the club. In other words, the court found that it wasn’t the city’s fault that Manta lost money.


The state directed the case to return to trial court to settle the question of whether the 1995 court order would have been issued had the city given a judge correct information on how much land was set aside for adult businesses.

Both sides agree that a San Bernardino staffer overstated the amount of land where Flesh Club could have operated under the zoning laws in place when the legal battle began.

Penman expressed confidence that the city could prove that enough land was available. Manta’s attorney, Roger Jon Diamond, responded that his side would prevail since the old zoning law was struck down.

“I think it’s a foregone conclusion,” Diamond said.


Facebook Twitter Plusone Reddit Stumbleupon Tumblr Email

13 thoughts on “Flesh Club case goes back to trial court

  1. Definitely consider that which you stated. Your favorite reason appeared to be at the net the simplest thing to take note of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed even as people consider worries that they just don’t realize about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side effect , other people can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

  2. I’ve read several excellent stuff here. Certainly price bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how so much effort you set to create the sort of excellent informative website.

  3. Great submit, very informative. I’m wondering why the opposite experts of this sector don’t notice this. You should continue your writing. I am sure, you have a huge readers’ base already!|What’s Happening i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found It absolutely useful and it has aided me out loads. I’m hoping to give a contribution & aid other users like its helped me. Great job.

  4. Hi, I do believe this is a great site. I stumbledupon
    it 😉 I’m going to come back once again since i have saved as a favorite it. Money and freedom is the best way to change, may you be rich and continue to help others. Payday Loans

  5. An intriguing discussion is definitely worth comment.
    There’s no doubt that that you ought to publish more on this issue, it may not be a taboo subject but usually people don’t talk about such subjects. To the next! Cheers!! raspberry ketone clinical studies

  6. An impressive share! I’ve just forwarded this onto a colleague who had been conducting a little research on this. And he actually ordered me dinner due to the fact that I stumbled upon it for him… lol. So let me reword this…. Thanks for the meal!! But yeah, thanks for spending some time to discuss this matter here on your web site. payday loans zap

  7. Hello there, There’s no doubt that your website might be having browser compatibility issues. When I take a look at your website in Safari, it looks fine however when opening in I.E., it’s got some overlapping issues.

    I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Aside from that, excellent blog!

  8. Undeniably imagine that which you stated. Your favorite reason appeared to be on the net the simplest thing to bear in mind of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed even as folks think about worries that they just do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the highest and also outlined out the entire thing without having side-effects , folks could take a signal. Will likely be again to get more. Thank you

  9. Financial background of the lender is also truly checked while affording money.
    The loan seekers are n’t to pay any kind of single cent just for processing of the loan application. Do you need some fiscal allow for till you go your pay? http://www.jrfinance.com/

Comments are closed.