Lombardi, on Boyle
Here's the part of Lombardi's interview that I referenced the other day, the part where he talks about why Brian Boyle played center instead of defense during his final exhibition game with the Kings. In short, Lombardi said they're not abandoning the move to defense, but then gave a long, detailed explanation about why the defense experiment might ultimately make Boyle a better center. Draw your own conclusions.
This is all in response to my question about whether or not they were rethinking the Boyle-to-defense strategy:
``No, no that was nothing. We're sticking with it. We just wanted to give him a little taste and see where he was at. That was explained to him very clearly and he's on board. The intention is to continue to try to make him a defenseman. He gave us a little look at what he looked like as a center at the NHL, but we're not abandoning that at this stage. As long as things are explained to the kid, which is where communication is critical, I don't believe they get confused.
``You see this in baseball. Seventy percent of your position players were shortstops at one time or another. You see a lot of guys go from third base to catcher. There's constantly this type of thing. Bottom line is, he's an athlete. The whole thing is how you communicate and how he's taught. Because in the end, let's say worst-case scenario...well, not worst-case scenario, but let's just say a year from now he goes back to center. Handled properly, he's going to be a better player. One thing he's going to learn is, it's going to force him, at this stage, to improve his feet, because he's going to have to move forward, backward and sideways. He's going to improve his stick. He's going to improve his read.
``If you go the other way with him, down the road, as a center, for him to be effective he's going to have to be like a Handzus and be really good defensively. This experience, of him playing defense, will only make him better if he has to go back to center and play that role again. And I think it's a really helpful thing and will actually make him better. So, you cover your off side at this point. No, we're not going that route and we're going to stick with it. If it doesn't work, I think it's going to make him a better player.''

J.P. Hoornstra writes about NHL and IHL hockey for the Los Angeles Newspaper Group. He welcomes any and all dialogue on the finer points of hockey.
E-mail J.P. at
Jill Painter joined the Daily News in 2000 and during the last eight years she's covered the Dodgers, Cal State Northridge, UCLA, Kings, golf and everything in between. Even though she's from Colorado, she still freezes in the Staples Center press box but always manages to thaw her fingers in time to make deadline. E-mail Jill at 

For a similar case study, See Burns, Brent
http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php3?pid=71733
Honestly, I don't think the Kings know what to do with this guy, and it will be interesting to see what they direct Coach Morris to do with him down in Manchester.
In college softball, 80% of your team probably started out as pitchers, and then get rotated to other positions as the coach sees fit.
All the best atheletes naturally migrate to a few key positions. It's what the coach does with those individuals that either makes or breaks their development.
Same here with Boyle. We NEED A huge power forward, that would be even better then a monster on the blue line in my opinion.
I love Lombardi's baseball analogies. He makes them regularly and I'm actually starting to be offended by it. He must think the only sport we understand in this town is baseball. He figures if he can explain the reasoning of his Hockey decisions in baseball terms we'll understand them better. I appreciate the fact that he's trying to give a good explanation to a fair question but does everything have to revolve around other sports? Or maybe he does run his team the way a baseball GM would. Or maybe he just wants to replace Ned Colletti... ..I wouldn't mind.