Reunited...will it feel so good?

| | Comments (4) |

At least for one game -- or perhaps, at least for the start of one game -- Derek Armstrong, Michael Cammalleri and Alexander Frolov will be reunited on a line. The theory is simple: Last year, Cammalleri and Frolov had breakthrough seasons playing together, and with Armstrong. This year, Cammalleri has been outstanding but the other two have been inconsistent at best. By breaking up the top line, Crawford is hoping to generate a little balance and also jump-start players such as Frolov, Armstrong and Nagy, who will skate with Kopitar and Brown.

There's also a timing issue, in terms of the opponent. Crawford said after practice that he wants Boston to make a choice. He doesn't want the Bruins to be able to send Zdeno Chara out after the Cammalleri-Kopitar-Brown line every time. As Crawford said, he wants the Bruins to make a choice, and his theory is that their choice will be harder if he spreads out the Kings' talent.

So I put the question to Dustin Brown. If you have one line playing exceedingly well but you don't have balance, is it better to break up that line, or keep it together and keep tinkering elsewhere until you find something that works?

``It's a hard decision, really,'' Brown said. ``That one line has the potential to win a game for you by themselves if they're on the game, but you also want balance. The ideal situation would be to have two strong scoring lines, and we can do that. We have the players. It's just a matter of the players playing the way that they can.

``It's just about finding chemistry. Me and Cammy and Kopi had some chemistry, but it's just about finding the right mix of players.''

(By the way, the slogans are hilarious. Maybe I should forward them to the Kings' marketing department...)

4 Comments

anthony said:

Yippy. This new strategy of Crawford should last, oh lets say, - 1 or 2 periods.

Goon Squad said:

Rich or Matt, this is off topic, but it would be really interesting to hear from Dave Lewis regarding our defense. Are they learning a new system, because they all look bad. Any chance of splitting up Blake and Lubo? It reminds me of Blake and Zhitnik years ago - too many cooks.

Histkng said:

I think the Kings' second line should be Frolov-O'Sullivan-Cammalleri. O'Sullivan has more offensive potential than Armstrong. I like Derek, but he's 3rd line material at best.

John Torchetti said:

The Kings have a marketing department?

Leave a comment

About the bloggers

J.P. Hoornstra writes about NHL and IHL hockey for the Los Angeles Newspaper Group. He welcomes any and all dialogue on the finer points of hockey. E-mail J.P. at jp.hoornstra
@inlandnewspapers.com
.

Jill Painter joined the Daily News in 2000 and during the last eight years she's covered the Dodgers, Cal State Northridge, UCLA, Kings, golf and everything in between. Even though she's from Colorado, she still freezes in the Staples Center press box but always manages to thaw her fingers in time to make deadline. E-mail Jill at jill.painter@dailynews
.com
.

Vincent Bonsignore is a sports columnist for the Los Angeles Daily News. E-mail Vinny at vincent.bonsignore
@dailynews.com
.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Rich Hammond published on October 11, 2007 3:01 PM.

Line change was the previous entry in this blog.

So close is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

John Torchetti on Reunited...will it feel so good?: The Kings have a marketing department? ...

Histkng on Reunited...will it feel so good?: I think the Kings' second line should be Frolov-O'Sullivan-Cammalleri. ...

Goon Squad on Reunited...will it feel so good?: Rich or Matt, this is off topic, but it would be really interesting to ...

anthony on Reunited...will it feel so good?: Yippy. This new strategy of Crawford should last, oh lets say, - 1 or ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.25