``Power'' back in the play

| | Comments (5) |

Before the Dallas game, the Kings had a five-game stretch in which they scored only one power-play goal in 17 chances. Against the Stars, though, they went 2 for 4 on the power play. Against the Ducks, they went 2 for 8.

Coach Marc Crawford said the key to the Kings' power-play success is generating shots from the point, from players such as Lubomir Visnovsky, Rob Blake and Brad Stuart. Visnovsky has two power-play assists in the last two games and Stuart has one.

``When you have a point shot that is able to score, the way we do, it spreads out the defensemen,'' Crawford said. ``The simplicity of having that weapon forces the opponent to make choices.''

5 Comments

anthony said:

I agree with Crow's analysis on the power play.
Shots from the point do generate opportunities in front of the net. And Crow seems to have that chemistry going.
However I don't understand why he keeps putting Armstrong on the second unit power play with Nagy & Frolov. He often sems out of place on that line. Like having two diamonds and a dud.
I believe either Handzus or O'Sullivan would be a better choice to compliment Fro & Nagy. Or maybe even Moulson.
By the way, when Calder comes off the D.L. I hope they keep Moulson on the team and send down Zeiler to the minors.

Maverick Author Profile Page said:

I have to agree with you there anthony. I think Crawford should be playing Zus or Sully with Nagy and Fro. Also Moulson so far has been proving himself to be far more capable than Zeiler, I hope he stays long after Calder comes back so we can see what he can really do.

taz42 said:

Never question Crows line choices. I don't think he even knows.

Dan H. said:

I'd like to see Johnson get some PP time to see what the kid can do. He's sure playing well enough to deserve it.

Oh man and I have to agree with Anthony about Armstrong...I questioned that over the weekend on one of the threads.

dfouser said:

i always thought the pp was most effective when cammalleri was shooting from the half-wall. his shot, more than anyone else's on the team, has to be guarded against, and it opens up a lot of ice to have him ready to pull the trigger.

Leave a comment

About the bloggers

J.P. Hoornstra writes about NHL and IHL hockey for the Los Angeles Newspaper Group. He welcomes any and all dialogue on the finer points of hockey. E-mail J.P. at jp.hoornstra
@inlandnewspapers.com
.

Jill Painter joined the Daily News in 2000 and during the last eight years she's covered the Dodgers, Cal State Northridge, UCLA, Kings, golf and everything in between. Even though she's from Colorado, she still freezes in the Staples Center press box but always manages to thaw her fingers in time to make deadline. E-mail Jill at jill.painter@dailynews
.com
.

Vincent Bonsignore is a sports columnist for the Los Angeles Daily News. E-mail Vinny at vincent.bonsignore
@dailynews.com
.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Rich Hammond published on November 14, 2007 7:44 PM.

Good news, bad news was the previous entry in this blog.

Note to commenters is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

dfouser on ``Power'' back in the play: i always thought the pp was most effective when cammalleri was shootin ...

Dan H. on ``Power'' back in the play: I'd like to see Johnson get some PP time to see what the kid can do. ...

taz42 on ``Power'' back in the play: Never question Crows line choices. I don't think he even knows. ...

Maverick on ``Power'' back in the play: I have to agree with you there anthony. I think Crawford should be pla ...

anthony on ``Power'' back in the play: I agree with Crow's analysis on the power play. Shots from the point d ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.25