Ivanans terms
$1.2 million over two years (600k per). He's making $475,000 this season.
9 Comments
Leave a comment
About the bloggers
Rich Hammond has covered the Kings, on a full-time or part-time basis, since the 2000-01 season. He was the beat writer for the entire John Torchetti era and has witnessed Bob Miller singing country music in a Nashville honky-tonk bar. A native of Los Angeles, Rich has worked at the Daily News since 1999 and also serves as the paper's deputy sports editor. E-mail Rich at rich.hammond@dailynews.com.
Jill Painter joined the Daily News in 2000 and during the last eight years she's covered the Dodgers, Cal State Northridge, UCLA, Kings, golf and everything in between. Even though she's from Colorado, she still freezes in the Staples Center press box but always manages to thaw her fingers in time to make deadline. E-mail Jill at jill.painter@dailynews.com.
Inside the Kings comments
Creating a Movable Type commenting account is easy: After you click on the "comments" link in a blog post (or are already in an individual blog entry), click "sign in." When you are at the Movable Type "sign-in to comment" screen, after the words "Not a member?" click "Sign up!"
You will be asked for a minimal amount of information, including an e-mail address, which we need to verify the account.
If you sign up and for some reason don't get a return e-mail confirming your new account, please e-mail Steven Rosenberg at steven.rosenberg@dailynews.com, and he will activate your account and notify you. He can also help you with any other issues regarding signing up for or leaving comments on the blog.
Tip: To ensure that you receive the confirmation e-mail when you do sign up to comment on the blog, BEFORE you sign up, put the e-mail address online@langnews.com in your mail program's address book. That way, the message from the server to confirm your account won't get lost in your spam file.
Another tip: Inside the Kings will also let you create a TypeKey account (or use an existing one) to comment. You can also use your OpenID, LiveJournal or Vox accounts to sign in for comments.
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Matthew Kredell published on January 29, 2008 6:29 PM.
Ivanans gets extension was the previous entry in this blog.
Kings lose 3-2 in OT is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Recent Comments
diehrdkingsfan38 on Ivanans terms: btw, i know the rules of hockey, distinct kicking motion and non disti ...
geeblenob on Ivanans terms: Diehard, I'm not sure if you understand the rules on disallowing a goa ...
DP on Ivanans terms: Good signing, glad he's locked up for 2 years at a cheap rate. Now go ...
matthew on Ivanans terms: I think what he was talking about is the Kings kicking themselves in t ...
Joe Dirt on Ivanans terms: 1.2 mill for 2 years doesn't sound like much money for getting your fa ...
Dorian on Ivanans terms: Diehard, wtf are you talking about? You sound like an ignorant homer. ...
pr0cess on Ivanans terms: That is a lose i can swallow, and the 1 point isnt bad too. Gratz to i ...
diehrdkingsfan38 on Ivanans terms: wow that was bullshit, you could tell hartnell kicked that crap in. It ...
Search
Links
Inside the Kings page
FOLLOW US ON TWITTER
twitter.com/insidethekings
KINGS-RELATED LINKS
Daily News' Kings coverage
Kings official site
Hockey's Future
Let's Go Kings
Online Kingdom
HockeyTalk.biz (Kings)
Frozen Royalty blog
The Hockey News
Manchester Union-Leader
NEWSPAPER BLOGS
Avalanche (Denver Post)
Blue Jackets (Col. Dispatch)
Blues (Post Dispatch)
Bruins (Boston Globe)
Canucks (Vanc. Province)
Capitals (Washington Post)
Coyotes (Ariz. Republic)
Devils (Newark Star-Ledger)
Ducks (S.B. Sun)
Ducks (O.C. Register)
Flames (Calgary Herald)
Flyers (Del. County Times)
Islanders (Newsday)
Lightning (St. Pete Times)
Oilers (Edmonton Journal)
Penguins (Pitt. Post-Gazette)
Predators (Tennessean)
Rangers (NY Daily News)
Sabres (Buffalo News)
Senators (Ottawa Citizen)
Sharks (SJ Mercury News)
Thrashers (Atlanta J-C)
Wild (Minn. Star Tribune)



wow that was bullshit, you could tell hartnell kicked that crap in. Its just BULLSHIT!
That is a lose i can swallow, and the 1 point isnt bad too.
Gratz to ivanans good to see a heart and soul guy get some money
Diehard, wtf are you talking about? You sound like an ignorant homer. Look at the replay, it was NOT KICKED IN!!!
1.2 mill for 2 years doesn't sound like much money for getting your face beat in every night.
I think what he was talking about is the Kings kicking themselves in the head in overtime, did any of them want the puck?. I think Lubo gave away the puck about three times and JMFJ about the same,and come to think about it so did Fro and that led to a goal.You know I don't have any bad feelings about Willsie but Purcell should have played instead.The referees were terrible but what do you expect from Kerry (is my hair perfect)Frazier,that guy has had it out for the Kings for about 20years.Man I thought that guy retired,at least he now wears a helmet instead of his hair looking like one.Boy ,him and Mr Magoo where the worst for the Kings.I sure would have liked to see them go into the shoot-out,I think they could have won it.Oh yeah speaking of shoot-outs, why was'nt Kopi used in the shoot-outs in the allstar game? I think he has probably the best moves out of all those other guys and has probably scored more,so what do they use him in fastest skater.Oh and one last thing Neidermeyer should not have been invited to the allstar game I think Brown would have been more of an asset
Good signing, glad he's locked up for 2 years at a cheap rate.
Now go get a middle weight worth a dman.
Diehard,
I'm not sure if you understand the rules on disallowing a goal. The player has to make a 'distinct kicking motion' for it to be disallowed. Simply going in off the skate is fine. Hartnell was falling/sliding to the net and the puck went in off his skate. He couldn't possibly make a kicking motion while doing that. There was ABSOLUTELY NO doubt about it and, frankly, I was rather surprised they even bothered reviewing it (although the slow-mo replay made it even more clear that it was a legit goal). It was just a bad break for the Kings.
btw, i know the rules of hockey, distinct kicking motion and non distinct kicking motion. I can't help but not side on my team, i'm a homer and i have to support my team. And i agree with you geeblenob i knew it would be disallowed, but i was praying
this is the funniest debate ever. the goal just sorta sucked. that's all. like that time in the early 90s when the Kings were eliminated from the playoffs against the Oilers in overtime and they disallowed a goal for a kicking motion (which probably should've been one) and i was so happy in my living room...but then the Oilers scored like 1 minute later anyways...