More on Zeiler suspension

Here’s the release the Kings just sent.
KINGS’ ZEILER SUSPENDED FOR THREE GAMES

TORONTO (November 24, 2008) – Los Angeles Kings forward John
Zeiler has been suspended for three games, without pay, as a result of a
boarding incident that took place during NHL Game #295, Nov. 22 against
the
Colorado Avalanche, the National Hockey League announced.

Zeiler was assessed a major penalty for boarding and game
misconduct for hitting Colorado defenseman Adam Foote at 6:51 of the
second
period.

Under the terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, and
based
on his average annual salary, Zeiler will forfeit $8,770.17. The money
goes
to the Players’ Emergency Assistance Fund.

Zeiler will miss tomorrow night’s game at Calgary; Nov. 26 at
Edmonton and Nov. 29 against Chicago. He will be eligible to return
Dec. 1
against the Toronto Maple Leafs.

Facebook Twitter Plusone Digg Reddit Stumbleupon Tumblr Email
  • Anonymous

    what happens when a player is suspended? can you recall another player to take his spot or is it usually someone who has been scratched who will play?

  • Carla M.

    The rule as I understand is that you can have a player double shift then you don’t have to worry about one player being out. Just my opinion!

  • http://rebeltheory.com/ ian monsta

    players don’t have to double shift, a normal scratch player (army, richardson or harrold) can take that players roster spot. however you cannot call someone up to take his place.

  • Anonymous

    They should suspend Chris Foster for having such a bad outfit Saturday night as well.

  • http://www.ifreezeti.me/ Gary Livingston

    What is double shifting?

    Does that mean Doughty has been playing triple shifts?

  • MasterAL99

    Looked like a clean hit to me. Maybe a 2 minute penalty at the most. I’ve seen a lot worse resulting in no penalty even. You can’t punish the result, you must punish the action. If Foote got right back up, nothing would have happened. In fact, nothing was called until the refs had a little meeting if I remember correctly.

    M

  • Milton Waddams

    A 2, a 5, a game misconduct and a 3 game suspension all for a hit that the ref who was standing 5 feet away from the play didn’t even have his hand up for. Ridiculous.

  • Carla M.

    Ok thanks for that clarification!

  • FUNDA

    The worse part is that the Kings pay him $2,923.39 per game for the remainder of the season.

  • Carla M.

    Gary Double shifting I believe means when a player will play on one line then maybe play again on another line. They frequently can play defense too that way they get a bit of a rest and then go back to their forward lilnes. I don’t konw for sure but I don’t think the coach has to declare this to the officials, just to the opposing team so they know how to match lines. Hope I explained this well enough.

  • JGSmall

    The league reviews all match penalties for further action (actually, all games – a penalty does not need to be called). They looked at taped replays of the hit and decided to impose a suspension. The point of the suspension is to prevent serious injury. it is aimed at changing the way all players think about lining up and finishing a check.

  • Anonymous

    maybe we could double shift Calder, maybe he will actually skate around on the second shift, he usually stands and looks at himself on the big screen during his regular shift, anyways! go kings, I would like to thank the Tampa Bay lightning for drafting offense when they really needed defense.

  • brianguy

    “They should suspend Chris Foster for having such a bad outfit Saturday night as well. ”

    POTD – photos, please!

  • Milton Waddams

    FUNDA said: “The worse part is that the Kings pay him $2,923.39 per game for the remainder of the season.”

    hahahaha. That’s funny.

  • Oregon Kings Fan

    Sorry Carla you are wrong regarding the declaration of double shift players. The rule, Section 89.3 is the team has to have the double shifted player wear a number above 60.

  • Anonymous

    Who is Chris Foster??

  • Chris Foster’s outfit

    “The league reviews all match penalties for further action (actually, all games – a penalty does not need to be called).”

    Didn’t Zeiler receive a major for boarding and not a match?

  • Anonymous

    If the league reviews every game – then why did they not review the hit Ovechkin gave Brownie? That was from behind, granted not at the boards, but still… This league runs on double standards – if it truly wanted to stop this – they would suspend the “superstar” players as well not just the 4th liners…

  • Mark

    The only thing that Zeiler should have been in trouble for was elderly abuse. That hit was total Karma for the cheap beatdown Foote tried on Brown in Vegas.

  • anthony

    I don’t know about you guys, but I’m ecstatic.
    Its not as though we’re in jeopardy of losing.

  • Cynic

    If Dion Phaneuf makes this hit on Foote, There is no suspension.

    The NHL is seizing an opportunity to respond to the outcry of ‘cheap’ hits in the league by punishing a ‘nobody’ of sorts to say ‘Hey Look Everyone! We got Big, Bad John Zeiler! See, we’re cracking down!’.

    This suspension is BS! As stated earlier, the ref didn’t even have his hand up. They called the major because it was Adam Foote. If it was Daniel Tjarnqvist, nobody would give a crap.

    The NHL saw an opportunity and they took it. Sucks for John the scapegoat….

  • Anonymous

    I can not beleive you folks that was a dirty nasty hit by Zeiler take a look again and play it slow. I have 12 year old son who is paralysed from the neck down on hit very similiar to this . Zeiler didn’t even bother to slow down. And please don’t tell me it’s part of the game. In all major minor hockey every player has a stop sign on the back of their jersey when you see it don’t play the body. You all would be singing another tune if Foote was paralysed.

  • MarkE

    I was sitting right there and Zieler gave him a shoulder at the end of the hit. Foote injured his back not his head. It probably had just as much to do with being a solid hit as his age. The Zebra’s didn’t call an initial penalty because it wasn’t that hard of a hit. Also the Av’s didn’t even respond until Foote didn’t get up… because it was just a basic hit. For you Zeiler bashers, that hit turned the game for the Kings. When he hits it fires up the opposition, witch in turn fires up the Kings. It make them stand together as a team.

    Also at every Meet the Kings he is one of the truly genuine guys. He talked with both my daughters as if they were the only ones there. Go Zeiler!

  • BringBackKingston

    earlier this month TK got a 3 game suspension for this hit http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaKyKkDoZzc

    is Zeiler’s hit similar enough? or do the dissimilarities warrant less of a suspension?

  • Carla Muller

    Whoever is commenting here pretending to be me, Carla M., that is indeed not me. I respectfully request either Jill or Rich not allow someone to post here using my identity. Thanks in advance.

  • Marc Nathan

    I think there was a typo in the headline. Shouldn’t it be: MORON ZEILER: SUSPENSION ?

  • Kevin Y

    They weren’t even going to call a penalty on this play until Zeiler was triple-teamed afterwards. The referee didn’t have his hand up, but decided to call a penalty because he figured it was so severe that three players had to assault him in his defense.

    But, remember that Brown didn’t get a suspension for his hit on Ribiero. So, if I had my pick, I’d rather lose Zeiler for three games for a hit I didn’t think warranted even a penalty than lose Brown for three games for a hit I didn’t think warranted even a penalty.

  • THE BUTTHOLE SURFERS

    BBK – It’s hard to judge based on the quality of available video, but that one by TK DOES look different to me. It doesn’t look like Van Ryn is ever aware of his presence and unlike Foote, Van Ryn is facing directly at the boards. In my opinion, Foote appeared to be about to forehand and take the hit, then turned on the backhand trying to evade being checked.
    I just think this is a perfect example of how messed up the rules are. If it looked like a penalty we would’ve seen the refs arm ‘shoot’ up and the fracas would have broken out instantly. The only variable here is Foote got hurt and stayed down.

    Another way to look at this is to view this video of Kopecky checking Gauthier:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yICYl3szjKk

    Kopecky is seeing all numbers on the back but follows through with his check as Gauthier turns on his FOREHAND. If Gauthier starts turning the other way he’s in the same position as Foote. There was no penalty called on Kopecky’s hit.

    I have no problem if the refs need to call that a penalty, but this suspension is F’ing ridiculous, especially in light of what Ovechkin got away with Thursday night.

  • Anonymous

    First of all, I’m am a HUGH Kings fan, just like the rest of you guys, so with that said…

    Zeiler’s hit was a big lack of respect toward a fellow hockey player. To me Zeiler never meant to hurt Foote, but still knew exactly what he was doing. One of the first things that your are taught in pee wee’s and jr’s, DO NOT HIT THE PLAYER FROM BEHIND.

    Now, he’s not the only guy to have done it, and he won’t be the last. What the league did was correct, and well maybe should have been longer to maybe set a example out of him. To me Zeiler is one lucky bastard for now. However on the other hand, he has left the door open for Col to take even more runs at our young guys the next time we meet. I hope that Zeilers back in the line up then, so we can either see him turtle, or fight like a man.

    JMFJ was ready to go even though his hit was clean and legal. Zeiler to me took refuge behind Greener, and the rest of Ivo.

    Rich/Jill what’s your take on the hit… Clean or dirty?

  • Chris Bond

    All Star Vote
    WRITE IN DREW…….

  • Chris Bond

    ALL STAR VOTE
    WRITE IN DREW VOTE FOR HIM….

  • -J

    Food for thought- here’s the text from the NHL rulebook on checking from behind:

    “A check from behind is a check delivered on a player who is not aware of the impending hit, therefore UNABLE TO DEFEND HIMSELF, and contact is made on the back part of the body. When a player intentionally turns his body to create contact with his back, no penalty shall be assessed.”

  • deadcatbounce

    If I remember correctly, no penalty was called on Zeiler until after the ensuing scrum.

  • http://insidesocal.com/painting Jill Painter

    Some of you need to get a new username and stop calling others names. I’m baffled that some of you still haven’t figured this out.

  • EAT THE RICH

    To the Anonymous posts – Nobody wants to see guys get injured. But the youth movement to curb hitting from behind is new. Guys Zeiler’s age weren’t brought up with that. I don’t for a second think Zeiler is a dirty player. The hit wasn’t even that hard. By comparison, Kostopolous’ hit was much harder.

    I also don’t think Zeiler was showing a lack of disrespect. If anything, his lack of experience and desire to make an impact make him guilty only of not being under control. I don’t have a problem with how the referees dealt with the situation, but the league suspension coming on the heels of the actions of Ovechkin only 2 nights earlier is proof that the NHL isn’t capable of policing itself. They’re reactive instead of proactive. If they were concerned about players intentionally injuring others and showing a lack of respect, a replay of Ovechkin’s run at Brown’s head would provide them the opportunity to send a real message without someone getting hurt. Not to mention, they don’t seem to have a problem with players punching each other in the face. It looks to me like they follow the money.

    Actually, being that our management was schooled in Philly, I’m surprised there’s no Bobby Clarkish support from them for their player. Zeiler could use the support and I’m sure he doesn’t want to be remembered as a villian; or go play as one…

    Finally, I happened to turn on NHL Network Classic Replays and there were at least 3 hits exactly like that in the highlights of a playoff series between Florida and Rangers from ’97. If they want it to stop, they have to penalize it whenever it happens, no subjectivity about it.

  • EAT THE RICH

    uh, lack of respect, I mean. doh.

  • Paul from Oxnard

    I’m actually surprised Zeiler didn’t get more. It was clearly a dirty hit. He followed Foote in from the blue line, took his hand off his stick, followed through with a shove to the back even though he saw the back of Foote’s jersey, and skated away like he just scored the game winner in game 7 of the finals. It was as dirty a hit as I’ve seen since Chris Simon last year trying to kill Ryan Hollweg with his stick.

  • mrbrett7

    This is that hard people.

    It’s simple. If you can see the numbers and the name, you cannot, EVER hit the person, PERIOD. Just because the referee did not initially call a penalty does not make the hit legal.

    Who here has played defense? Who here has ever chased the puck down in their zoned and been t’ed off on by an oncoming forward? I have, and I still don’t remember the game, that day, nor the next day. Why? Because I was hit from behind, head first into the boards. Did I know the guy was behind me? Yeah, I think I did from what little I can remember, but that is a ridiculous aside to the rule. If you can see the name and number, DON’T HIT THEM, PERIOD.

    With the new rules where oncoming forcheckers can’t be “obstructed”, the rules of touch up icing, a goaltenders decreased inability to play the puck, the NHL did this to themselves. Moreover, the instigator rule does not allow the players to police themselves. An NHL tweener like Zeiler (and others like Kostopolous for example), can run around and destroy guys on hits like this that are potential career ending (and could be to them as well, how soon we forget Adamn Deadmarsh), and they have no worry about paying the price. Let the players police themselves, and I gaurantee you a drastic drop in these hits.

  • Old man

    I like what Mrbrett said,don`t run to big brother.

  • mrbrett7

    Eat the Rich…and now you have your support, and I give kudo’s to Lombardi for that support.

    I don’t like the hit, nor any hits like this, but the GM must stand up for his player, just as the players on the ice must stand up for their teammates (as they did, in a heartbeat).

    I’m having so much fun watching this team play…they are FAR different than the mish-mash of the last 2 years. This is an actual team.

  • Anonymous

    Hey I’m the “Anonymous” I guess I don’t know to click the right button…

    Anyway.. “Eat the Rich”, I hear what you are saying and respect that. And I also agree, with you about the league not “always” getting it right, ie Ovech. I don’t think that Zeiler’s a dirty player, I do think that he’s a moron, and it was a bone headed play.

    mrbrett7, great points, and yes I do play on D… I know EXACTLY where you are coming from.

    Well, on the plus side, it gives someone else a way back in the line-up!

  • mrbrett7

    Sorry to go off there…people need to take off their Kings glasses and really look at this.

    Playing defense is hard enough, but now you have to fear for your livelihood these days.

  • THE BUTTHOLE SURFERS

    mrbrett – You’re simply not correct when saying you can’t hit in the numbers. It happens every night. J posted the criteria for boarding majors and it patently says that the ‘victim’ must not be aware of the presence of the player coming for the check. This isn’t a Kings bias, its what we see every night. I posted a hit from Kopecky on Gauthier earlier in this season, and it shows exactly what happens when the defenseman is being ‘tracked’ by a forward from behind and getting hit. It’s on youtube, look at it. The simple reality is that it wasn’t even a hard check. Foote got injured because he was in an awkward position. That’s his fault as the responsibility to protect himself knowing he’s being tracked is his own.
    It’s not an icing call, the rules haven’t been adapted for this.
    Also, comparing this to your own experience doesn’t equate. Foote should have known better.
    I don’t like players getting injured, I couldn’t even watch the Zednick incident, but in pro sports its going to happen and when it does it’s not always because someone did something wrong.
    Also, Deadmarsh’s early retirement was sparked by a fight he got into with Jovonoski while Jovo played for Vancouver. He suffered a severe concussion that made him ever-susceptible to more and worse concussions. How does Deadmarsh’s retirement relate?
    In the end, the NHL doesn’t give a sh*t about these players as long as the game is getting sold. Fighting has ended careers and put players on the IR but the league won’t do anything about it. In this case, they’re trying to take the easy way out and suspend Zeiler. If they really want to prevent injuries from hits in the back they can ban it at any time they please, regardless of whether the checked player turns into it themselves.

  • sd

    I totally agree with “THE BUTTHOLE SURFERS”…

    mrbrett, hitting the numbers if not illegal. If it was, it would be called on EVERY shift. If the league wants to protect its players, they need to penalize the action, not suspend a guy because the action they allow 99% of the time, had a flukey and bad outcome.

    I don’t blame Foote though. He tried to make a move and avoid the check, but I don’t blame Zeiler either. He was just doing his job and couldn’t anticipate Foote’s late move.

    I blame the league for allowing checking from behind when it suits their need for more hitting, but punishing a guy when the inevitable injury happens.

  • mrbrett7

    Soooo…it’s okay to hit a guy, from behind, head first into the boards? Hitting someone from behind open ice is most definately legal, hitting from behind, head first into the boards is not.

    I think not.

  • Quisp

    The rules are pretty clear about what’s allowed and what’s not. The problem is, the game moves very quickly, and it’s difficult — even with the benefit of video — to reach a consensus on what happened in any given moment under the microscope.

    But as far as when it’s legal to check from behind, etc., there are many rules which limit the ways in which you’re allowed to check people.

    1) the player has to have possession of the puck.
    2) you may not use your elbows, head, knees, skates or stick to check the player’s body. (elbowing, tripping, slashing, spearing, etc.)
    3) you may not check the player’s head or knees. (intent to injure; kneeing)
    4) you may not check a player with injurious force into the boards. (boarding)
    5) you may not skate in a direct line over distance (two strides, three? the rule has changed over the years) to check a player.
    6) you may not attempt to injure a player.

    It’s (practically) difficult to check a player from behind in the middle of the ice when he’s moving, especially using the helpful “if you can see his numbers” guideline. By definition you’re both moving in the same direction, or very close to it. If the player is standing still, however, and he receives a pass (or just happens to be stick-handling idly in place for some reason) and you plow him over with your shoulder from behind, in the small of the back for instance, this is not a penalty. However, if you charge at the player (taking several strides right at him) then it’s charging. If you check him into the boards, it’s boarding. Etc…

    The whole “if you can see his numbers” thing is helpful only to a point, then it’s just confusing. Clearly Zeiler could see Foote’s numbers the entire time he was skating behind him into the zone. But then Foote got the puck at the boards and pivoted. Doesn’t this change the “see his numbers” thing? It all happens in the blink of an eye. Foote DID change his direction either right before or right as the hit happened. Is Zeiler supposed to think, “oh I can’t see his numbers” so NOW I can hit him? Is he supposed to NOT forecheck because he thinks Foote might be injured if he happened to turn this way and and and but but but.

    The guideline about seeing the numbers, and the rule about the player not knowing the check is coming are meant to say, “if a player is in a vulnerable position with respect to the boards, and he doesn’t know you’re coming, and you check him head first into the boards, you’re going to get suspended, because it’s an obvious, by definition, intent to injure.”

    I don’t think Zeiler deserved a penalty for that check. Actually, maybe charging. I would have to look at it again to see if his feet kept moving etc. right up to the check, if he was moving in a direct path and so on. But I really don’t see any intent there. Other than “intent to play like John Zeiler.”

  • sd

    mr. brett,
    Of course it’s not ok to check someone head first into the board, but that’s not what you said originally.

    You said “If you can see the numbers and the name, you cannot, EVER hit the person, PERIOD.” This is false. The league allows you to hit a player, even into the boards, when you can see his numbers and name, provided it doesn’t break the rules that Quisp just listed. That was all I was saying.

    If the league wanted to prevent these types of injuries, and I think they should, they would do as you say and ban checking from behind PERIOD. The truth is that they want checking from behind, because fans like checking, so they walk this thin line of giving fans what they want while limiting injury.

    So, they police the injury instead of policing the action. The same action that is legal 99% of the time, when guys get smashed up against the boards and don’t get injured, becomes illegal when Foote makes an unexpected move at the last second and bends over far enough to put his head down by the boards instead of taking the impact into the glass.

    There is no way for Zeiler to adjust for this that quickly. It’s not like he hit Foote up high, like Kostopoulos did on Van Ryan. Sure, Zeiler could have come in with less force, but his job is to go out and make an impact, not just to bump Foote off the puck.

    If the league wants to fix this problem they need to have the refs call penalties on every occurrence for the action of every check from behind OR at least high speed or over-forceful checks from behind. Call it charging, but do something to make this consistent.

    If Foote just went into the glass and bounced off with no injury, there would have been no fight, no major, no match penalty and no suspension. That’s no way to stop the injuries, because Zeiler can’t do anything to avoid the injury besides stop doing his job.

  • http://www.ebaysuspensionfix.com Ebay Suspension

    You hit the nail on the head in that post, I’ll definitely be back for the next update.