What's worse?
What's worse, Rinkside View or the Kings' new third-jersey logo?

I'm not certain.
67 Comments
Leave a comment
About the bloggers
J.P. Hoornstra writes about NHL and IHL hockey for the Los Angeles Newspaper Group. He welcomes any and all dialogue on the finer points of hockey.
E-mail J.P. at jp.hoornstra@inlandnewspapers.com.
Jill Painter joined the Daily News in 2000 and during the last eight years she's covered the Dodgers, Cal State Northridge, UCLA, Kings, golf and everything in between. Even though she's from Colorado, she still freezes in the Staples Center press box but always manages to thaw her fingers in time to make deadline. E-mail Jill at jill.painter@dailynews
.com.
Vincent Bonsignore is a sports columnist for the Los Angeles Daily News. E-mail Vinny at vincent.bonsignore
@dailynews.com.
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Rich Hammond published on November 11, 2008 2:40 PM.
Is Avery good for the NHL? was the previous entry in this blog.
Scratching Armstrong is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Recent Comments
EAT THE RICH on What's worse?: eric - please don't suggest that. I find that Lion with Sunglasses to ...
eric on What's worse?: Why don't the kings just wear the Lion as a crest logo (the one with t ...
brianguy on What's worse?: "and my limited edition (only 25 made, and I believe only 4 sold) Memb ...
Brian on What's worse?: Nothing...NOTHING is worse than rink side view! ...
GummiBaked on What's worse?: This has got to be a joke. Has anyone thought that they may have let ...
Anonymous on What's worse?: just bought it. Best jacket I've ever owned. Boo rinkside. ...
GummiBaked on What's worse?: This has got to be a joke. Has anyone thought that they may have let ...
Wolfe on What's worse?: Well, I'm forced to watch RSV. I'm not forced to look at this horrend ...
Doughty's Girl on What's worse?: DON'T DISS THE SATIN JACKET! I have several of them, one from every di ...
Search this blog
Links
Daily News' Kings coverage
Kings official site
Hockey's Future
Let's Go Kings
Online Kingdom
HockeyTalk.biz (Kings)
Frozen Royalty blog
The Hockey News
Manchester Union-Leader
NEWSPAPER BLOGS
Avalanche (Denver Post)
Blue Jackets (Col. Dispatch)
Blues (Post Dispatch)
Bruins (Boston Globe)
Canucks (Vanc. Province)
Capitals (Washington Post)
Coyotes (Ariz. Republic)
Devils (Newark Star-Ledger)
Ducks (S.B. Sun)
Ducks (O.C. Register)
Flames (Calgary Herald)
Flyers (Del. County Times)
Islanders (Newsday)
Lightning (St. Pete Times)
Oilers (Edmonton Journal)
Penguins (Pitt. Post-Gazette)
Predators (Tennessean)
Rangers (NY Daily News)
Sabres (Buffalo News)
Senators (Ottawa Citizen)
Sharks (SJ Mercury News)
Thrashers (Atlanta J-C)
Wild (Minn. Star Tribune)
Advertisement
Other blogs

MNG Corporate Site Map | Newspaper Media Kit
| For more local Southern California News: | Copyright ©2011 |
| Los Angeles Newspaper Group |


Its a real toss up, in fact I think I tossed up a bit in my mouth after looking at those pictures! Geez Rich, you need to warn somebody before you do that!! Although, the jacket wouldnt be too bad, does it come with a big silver Kings logo necklace and chest hair??
This is like asking, "What's worse: Winning the lottery or inheriting millions of dollars?"
I hate them both.
But I'll wait to see the actiual uniforms before I pass judgment.
wow... who signed off on this?
SuperSonic420 - do you get some sweet roller disco skates with this satin jacket as well?
far out.
...I'm sad now...
The person who buys the jacket is worse.
Oy my god. Talk about the lesser of two evils.
Um...?
The satin jacket is worse than any logo they could put on it. What do they think this is, the 80's? Maybe they can bring back b.u.m. clothing too. I'm still not sold on this being the final logo. Too many photoshop fakes running around.
The logo is much much worse.
Unless the Kings decide to completely eliminate the current logo and replace it with this one, and then, after tons of people complain about how awful it is, Luc says "I going to get killed for this, but if these people don't like the new logo don't buy it"---I'm going to have to say that RSV is worse.
Rinkside view.
Are the jersey's mostly white and silver or is it reversed, black body/silver trim?
That looks a little too funky for my taste, but then again I'm a notoriously terrible judge of fashion and what looks good on the rack vs. what it looks like on a person. The logo is... eh I can't say it's horrendous but it definately could be better.
It's highly mediocre.
So final verdict, which sucks more - RSV sucks more.
I shrug at the logo and raise my fist at rinkside view.
Putting aside the jacket itself (the 70's called and want it back) The logo looks more of a European type logo. Please god do not let the Jerseys be metallic silver... I think I can deal with the Logo depending on what the rest of the Jersey looks like.
TOP 3 WORST ALL TIME LOGO/JERSEY... KINGS ARE A JOKE...
BAD TEAM, BAD OWNERS, SELL THE TEAM TO KANSAS..
I'M TIRED SEEING A BAD ON THE ICE.. AND BORING..
Since the main logo is Black Im thinking the jersey will be white
Rinkside view is definitely worse. That jacket is gross, but rinkside view makes me downright nauseous.
That jacket is, umm... fancy?
Are the Eighties making a comeback in hockey? Anyone who wears that needs to bust out a pair of parachute pants, velcro strap sneakers and an Izod polo so they can really impress the ladies. That jacket screams, "Members Only please".
ALONZO, you must Definitely be a band wagon fan. The ducks need you over there...
That logo looks like it was done as a high school art project...amateurish.
NOTHING is worse than rinkside view. An ugly 3rd jersey I can take, as long as I can actually watch my favorite team play.
Sort of off-topic, but over at ESPN.com, John Buccigross has even chimed in on the Rinkside View debate. http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/columns/story?columnist=buccigross_john&id=3696190)
Not that I have any love for Bucci (I think he is one of the worst hockey columnists around), but I thought it was interesting that he'd remark on this topic that has been so explosive on here for the last couple weeks.
RSV 100 %
another great idea by tom freuer
Wow. That jacket looks like it came off the back of some Guido in New Jersey. That is terrible.
Rinkside, by a hair.
I can't believe anybody (Luc?) signed off on this. I mean it's almost painful to look at. like some 5th grader designed it. I think my comical (guesswork) version of what this 3rd jersey logo would look like is actually not far off, and certainly not much worse:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/bri719/L-A.jpg (view full size)
also I've got to hand it to icethetics.info and related sites, which were pretty much dead on accurate at predicting the appearance of this.
anyway ... someone be sure and yell at Lieweke for me at the next game. to quote Seinfeld lawyer Jackie Chiles "the most public yet of my many humiliations!"
Rinkside view is far worse, but the logo is really lame. It looks like home plate.
At least it ain't the Gorton's Fisherman.
I hope they wear this exact design. with the black arms and shiny white chest.
JDM: the jerseys are all black......
think Gretzky era Kings with a few cues from the Kings' current styling (e.g. typeface for letters / numbers and the new crown in old colors)
rinkside view is like hell on earth
the uniforms are brutal, but i would still have to go with rinkside being the worst of the two. atleast without rinkside i would be able to see the kings wearing those dreadful unies!
Home Plate indeed... why am I suddenly hungry for a Dodger dog?
batter up!
Well, presumably rinkside view is temporary and hopefully for just few more broadcasts. We could be saddled with that 3rd jersey logo for years to come. So based on that, I'd say the logo.
How 'bout seeing this on RSV... Yikes!!
The jerseys are black and they look kind of like this:
http://i36.tinypic.com/rsv348.png
Nothing is worse than RSV.
adevandry, thanks. I've seen that picture. If they do end up looking close to that, I think they will look ok when 6 guys are wearing them on the ice. Could be better, but could be much much worse... we could have these - http://thrashers.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=NewsPage&articleid=385554
Those look like quite the eyesore.
But I do wish that they had gone old school, not Gretzky school... though I understand the marketing behind that decision.
Just like RSV, something that loyals don't care for but I could see casuals and potential hockey converts enjoying.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, YOU'RE LOS ANGELES RAIDEeerr...KINGS!
The jersey. Because I'm a season ticket holder and I never have to watch RSV. Plus, I'm getting that piece of crap for free. Ugh. I'd rather they credit my account!!
I can't wait to watch them play in those atrocious third jerseys while the game is broadcasted in "rinkside view"
There isn't enough rye on the planet to help me through that game.
I'd rather see the team playing in this 3rd jersey design, so long as it doesn't have any adverse side-effects as to how they play. That should tell you how bad RSV is.
I understand we finished tied for last in 07/08, but do we really need a down arrow to remind us?
The new logo, by far.
We can all collectively choose to ignore the rinkside view (i really don't find it as bad as some of you people do). But, come on...
We're in Los Angeles, surrounded by incredibly talented creative industry professionals and that crap is the best they can to to embody the LA KINGS in a symbol?
That's an F. A serious F. And, we can't ignore it and change the channel cause, well, we still want to support the team.
The new team is supposed to be more edgy, more tough, hard checkers, young, rejuvenated, nervous, full of heart and passion about making an actual difference in this city.
That looks like tired, done before, corporate bullshit with no heart and no soul. We all know they are from LA...no need making LA the prominent subject of the new logo. What's the point with the arrow pointing down? They trying to say LA Kings are going down?
I thought we're on the rise finally.
Ugh.
JDM,
The Thrashers jersey is worse and doesn't it look like Kovalchuk has a moustache in that picture? En guarde mon ami!!
Anonymous,
Rinkside view just fools you into thinking you've imbibed more than you really have. I can't even enjoy a sniff of scotch without getting woozy watching RSV. Bastards!
The shiny disco, disco, disco ball.
(I bet you get a free bowl of soup with that jacket!)
[or rollerskates]
OMG! I think I just threw up a little...
bad, bad, bad!
We need the 1967 jersey back!
oh, between both... hmmm going with rinkside, at lease it's not focusing on just on bad thing... it's just out of focus and behind the play... much like playing under crawford!
completely off topic...and i do apologize for that...check out this westgarth fight from the other night.
http://www.hockeyfights.com/fights/48584
p.s. i apologize if this violates any posting rules. not trying to plug the a website, just show a kings player at the top of his game.
Thumper, the rabbit from the Bambi movie, comes to mind here....
"Momma always said, If you can't say something nice, don't say nothing at all..."
I can't think of anything nice to say about either of these....
That's a no brainer the logo doesn't effect my ability to watch and enjoy the game.
I love when the puck is behind the goal and the camera is at center ice on rinkside view. The puck isn't even on the screen yeah that's great.
would you like hospital food or airline food with that?
someone needs to get fired for that... I'll take RSV any day.
Rinkside view is far worse. I agree with Tom K that the logo does not interfere with the ability to enjoy the game.
The logo is not so bad -- but it seems odd that in the middle of the artistic community that we have in Los Angeles that that logo was the best that they can do.
It looks .......economical.
And hey you folks up on top, I still have my purple satin Kings jacket and my limited edition (only 25 made, and I believe only 4 sold) Members Only Kings jacket. Did I really just open myself up to an Anthony response post? Fire away, I deserve it.
Let's have a throw back jacket night on the next home stand? I'll chip in for half a beer for the oldest one. Maybe the Kings will chip in for the other half. Luc?
FYI
Garret's link above is going to the wrong article. I believe this is the correct one http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/columns/story?columnist=buccigross_john&id=3696190
That logo is pretty darn awful. I'm thinking they can just keep that free third jersey I get as a season ticket holder...
Rinkside View is worse by far. I don't HAVE TO wear this logo, but I can't watch the Kings in HD without Rinkside View. ARRRGGGG!
I hope everyone continues to write to Tom Feuer at Fox Sports to let him know they need to fix this.
tom.feuer@foxsports.com
Talk about something that makes you want to puke! RSV any day of the week, the 3rd jersey, logo, vomit or whatever you want to call it has GOT TO GO! Ugliest thing I've ever seen imagined, shoot even the 70's weren't that bad.....
I actually think the jersey looks decent. Our third jersey during the gretzky years was far worse.
call me crazy. i really want to hate it. i really do. but, i don't know, its growing on me. i wouldn't be caught dead in that disco jacket, but i like the logo. i think i would like it more if it was only a shoulder patch.
i thought they should have utilized the lion for the new alternate. we have used the crest and the crown already, why not the lion. its bitchen, with the sunglasses, the stick and puck? come on now...
i will really have an opinion when i get my free jersey at the meet the players party on nov 23. then, after the real-life try on and critique, can i have an opinion that's solid.
DON'T DISS THE SATIN JACKET! I have several of them, one from every different "Era" that myself and family members have collected over time, and still wear them regularly =)
Well, I'm forced to watch RSV. I'm not forced to look at this horrendous logo.
RSV hands down
This has got to be a joke. Has anyone thought that they may have let this junk leak so everyone will be pleasantly surprised with something completely different on Nov 22nd?
just bought it. Best jacket I've ever owned. Boo rinkside.
This has got to be a joke. Has anyone thought that they may have let this junk leak so everyone will be pleasantly surprised with something completely different on Nov 22nd?
Nothing...NOTHING is worse than rink side view!
"and my limited edition (only 25 made, and I believe only 4 sold) Members Only Kings jacket"
wow... only 4 sold? that's crazy!
makes you wonder what happened to the other 21 -- theories:
1. burned
2. a couple 4XXXXLs still buried in the back of McNall and McMaster's closets
3. hot items at Goodwill that year
4. looked killer on some Inglewood / Westchester homeless dudes at the time (after being dug out of a dumpster).
FWIW my black M.O. was definitely my favorite back in the 6th grade... '85-86 to be accurate
Why don't the kings just wear the Lion as a crest logo (the one with the hockey stick and sun glasses) and their current crown on the shoulder, with black background. Animals with sticks are always a winner...i.e. Penguins, Sharks, Panthers.
eric - please don't suggest that. I find that Lion with Sunglasses to be extremely embarrassing. Please. I'd rather have the upside down envelope as shown above.
I wonder if you get a free pair of quads and tube socks with that jacket? Or maybe just a call from the 70's/80's saying they want that jacket back. But...that all said, if the last mock up shown above isn't all that bad (compared to the rinkside view...which I'm convinced they ought to have vomit bucket night for us average fans who can aford to only go to one or two games, so we have a licensed L.A. Kings bucket to retch into after rinkside view makes us yak for the remaining home games), just boring. Has anyone given an opinion as to why not the Fourm Blue/Gold uni's from 1967-68? Or even better, the big bananas from the early 70's? Those would be a third jersey/uniform to talk about.