Prof. Rancourt explained the unusual approach by saying he hoped the automatic grades would take the pressure off students in his fourth-year class and free them instead to concentrate on understanding the concepts he taught.
But another professor expressed an opposing view, saying:"If you want people who are responsible and know their stuff, you want independent thinkers. The only way to catalyze the development of an independent thinker is to give him or her freedom," he told the Ottawa Citizen after his suspension in December. "You can't use a carrot-and-stick, bang-them-on-the-head approach, and say 'you regurgitate this on Monday.' You've got to give them the freedom to follow that natural ability to learn."
grading performs an important function in the current system.
"Grades are a motivator to make students work harder. Some are going to learn for the love of it, but most will do the very minimum to get by," he said. "I think he's being very idealistic if he thinks a free A+ will maximize his students' proficiency in physics."
What do you think of this professor's unorthodox approach with his university students? Are college students mature enough to learn for learning's sake? Or do you think it's naive to believe that college students don't need grades as a motivator to work hard, particularly for the mandated classes outside of their major?

Kelly Puente joined the Press-Telegram in 2006 as an editorial assistant and eventually worked her way up to general assignement reporter. Over the years, she’s covered everything from crime and breaking news to human interest and the cities of Bellflower and Cerritos. Kelly is a Long Beach resident and graduate of Cal State Long Beach. She’s new to the education beat and is looking for great stories.


Leave a comment