« A History Lesson | Main | Islamophobia »
February 21, 2006
Should Gays Be Allowed to Adopt?
USA Today is covering the growing backlash against gay adoption:
Efforts to ban gays and lesbians from adopting children are emerging across the USA as a second front in the culture wars that began during the 2004 elections over same-sex marriage.As a staunch supporter of gay marriage--though an opponent of attempts by courts to impose the practice--gay adoption seems to me the most difficult question society faces with regards to gay rights.Steps to pass laws or secure November ballot initiatives are underway in at least 16 states, adoption, gay rights and conservative groups say. Some — such as Ohio, Georgia and Kentucky — approved constitutional amendments in 2004 banning gay marriage.
"Now that we've defined what marriage is, we need to take that further and say children deserve to be in that relationship," says Greg Quinlan of Ohio's Pro-Family Network, a conservative Christian group.
On most matters, marriage included, I find it morally impermissible for society to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, a trait I regard as intrinsic, not chosen.
Moreover my gay friends and acquaintances leave me quite convinced that the love gay couples feel for one another is no different than the love felt for one another by heterosexuals, and that the benefits they'd garner from marriage are as profound.
If you believe that committed, monogomous relationships are the best chance for a happy life and a good society, as many conservatives do, extending marriage rights to gays seems like a no-brainer.
Gay adoption is trickier because even those of us who normally demand that the law treat gays equally must weigh the welfare of another party: the child. When it comes to the system we set up for adoption, I care very little about fairness for adoptive parents because my priority is the welfare of the child.
So the question arises: is a child better off with heterosexual parents?
I don't know the answer. But my intuition is that all else being equal heterosexual parents are better for a child. People relate to men in ways largely influenced by their own father, and to women in ways largely influenced by their own mother. Since every child must relate to men and women in their lives, it makes sense to me that the lack of either sex as a primary caregiver is less than ideal.
That leads me to a conclusion I'm rather uncomfortable with: if forced to choose between a heterosexual couple and a gay couple I'd award adoption rights to the hetereosexual couple first, assuming that all else is equal.
That said, I find an outright ban on gay adoptive parents foolhardy. After all, all else is seldom equal. Sure, consider whether perspective parents will be able to provide a child with a role model of each sex. But there are many other factors that determine whether someone ought to be a good parent. An appropriate decision will weigh all these factors.
Moreover, it isn't as if we have so many willing adoptive parents that we ought to be turning good couples away simply because they're gay.
Julian Sanchez makes the same point in Reason Magazine:
...visit Florida and ask a child in foster care which makes him feel more threatened: the thought of being raised by homosexuals, or the prospect of an indefinite number of years spent passing through an indefinite number of homes.His whole essay is a quite convincing argument against bans on gay adoption.
Posted by Conor at February 21, 2006 03:36 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.insidesocal.com/MT/mt-tb.cgi/180
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Should Gays Be Allowed to Adopt?:
» backgammon accessory from backgammon accessory
backgammon accessory
This was the most unkindest cut of all.
-- William Shakespeare, "Julius Caesar"
[Read More]
Tracked on June 15, 2006 06:53 PM
» Buy cymbalta. from Buy cymbalta.
Buy cymbalta. [Read More]
Tracked on July 21, 2007 09:22 PM
» Forex rates. from Forex rates.
Forex rates. [Read More]
Tracked on August 20, 2007 08:22 AM
Comments
I think this a very sensitive issue, but gays should not be allowed to adopt for a number of different reasons. First of all they will have a skewed childhood, and when the hit middle school the other kids will have caught on and they surely will be made fun of. Also these kids with gay parents wouldnt be to likely to have a sleepover or anything of that nature because other parents might be skeptical to let their child stay with them. I think gays shouldnt be allowed to adopt to protect the child because kids can be very cruel, and growing up with two dads and two moms just seems kind of weird.
Posted by: Brian Chadwick at February 23, 2006 12:13 PM
I disagree with Brian. I think its true that they may be teased, but that should not curtail the rights of a couple to adopt. The love between a man and a woman and a man and a man or a woman and a woman is of equal value and should reap the same benefits, ie being able to adopt. In response to Conor who said "People relate to men in ways largely influenced by their own father, and to women in ways largely influenced by their own mother. Since every child must relate to men and women in their lives, it makes sense to me that the lack of either sex as a primary caregiver is less than ideal," I disagree. I think that each parent contributes different aspects, regardless of their sex. It is in some ways a stereotype to say that they would be missing out on certain traits which would be influenced by a parent of a certain sex. I think America is worried that a little boy will not play as many sports if he doesnt have a dad. But maybe one if his mothers was a great athlete and he can adhere those traits from her. Or maybe they are worried that a little girl will not know how to braid her hair. But I know of plenty of fathers who have taken it upon themselves to act as the female role and take over some of those things. How do you think it works in single parent homes? The parent is forced to adjust, and it works out just fine. I am not saying that it is an ideal situation for a kid to have homosexual parents, but it should by no means be illegal.
Posted by: Ellie at February 23, 2006 06:46 PM
Well, I'm split down the middle on this issue. In support of Ellie's argument that homosexual couples should adopt, I believe that since there is a growing number of single parents in America, a child would ideally be better off being with two parents, whether they may both be female or both be male. Furthermore, many people in places outside the US are raised in extended families, not necessarily by their own parents. Thus, the idea that two dads or two moms is weird does not really apply. I think that the societal norm in America which states that only a man and a woman should raise a child leads us to believe that anything else is "weird" and should be banned However, on the other hand, to uphold Brian's argument, I do feel like it would create some gender confusions for the child. Also, from experience, I grew up with my dad and there were times in my life when I couldn't talk to him about everything that was going on with me-emotionally, physically, relationship-wise etc . . . It just seems unfair to be overall, that an adopted child–who has no choice as to who. his or her parents’ are– should be forced to undergo these difficult circumstances in addition to having to deal with the challenges that come with being adopted.
Posted by: Falen at February 23, 2006 08:32 PM
Couldn't trackback, at least so far, but this post is listed in this week's Carnival of the Vanities at http://www.cigarintel.com/agency/archives/000832.php
Posted by: M at February 28, 2006 09:33 PM
Keep getting refused on trackback, but your post was included in the Carnival of the Vanities at http://www.cigarintel.com/agency/archives/000832.php
Posted by: M at February 28, 2006 09:59 PM
I'm not a big fan of gay rights - including the idea that gays have "the right" to adopt. However, back to Conor's statment, "it isn't as if we have so many willing adoptive parents that we ought to be turning good couples away simply because they're gay." The same logic applies to prospective single adoptive parents. To me, the only consideration of any consequence is the welfare of the child. If the adoptive parent or parents can provide a loving, economically secure environment for the child, then the child is better off being adopted than being a ward of the state. Gay, Christian, Muslim, straight, redneck or liberal: who cares? The child comes first, and last - there is no "right" to adopt.
Posted by: Lee at March 9, 2006 07:35 PM
I think gays should be allowed to adopt everyone should have the right to something it isnt fair to down someone for what they are as long as they are in a loving home then it should be okay it shouldnt matter what they are. Then if thats the case then that should be like whites cant adopt black children or vice versa so i think they should
Posted by: Whittney at March 22, 2006 10:38 AM