Hey-oh!
AS REPORTED EARLIER TODAY ON THE OCTORAZZI TWITTER EXCLUSIVELY - WORLD WIDE NEWS!!!!!!!
Hey-Hey-Hey!
Film is ROLLING over at MADONNA LANE and at a friend's home nearby! Sources tell OCTORAZZI that FILMING will only BE OF NADYA until the CHILDREN'S permits are given the judge's blessing over in L.A. Court!!!
A few PAPS were also around during the filming, so YOU might get to see some picks out there REAL SOON! Non from OCTORAZZI THOU, YET!
LATES!
Nice! Hopefully with all this interest Nadya will get a deal in the U.S.
All WHAT interest.
Ah Ha! Figured it out.
Q. How does one person have two or more IP Addresses.
A. Easy, one from your home and a second from your job site. (That was easy)
Q. But one IP Address is in one country and the second is in a completely different country?
A. Yes, you live in one country, say Mexico but as a Programmer or a Network Engineer you have the ability to tele-commute to your employer, say in California. Each site has a different IP Address. Picture it. You logon to your company’s PC through their firewall. All messages delivered from then on are disguised by the company’s assigned IP Addresses Internet cafés are not the only way to disguise your location.
Q. But how can you do that?
A. There is a whole host of software which does that very thing. At my shop, we used ‘My PC’.
Q. Is it legal.
A. Don’t know, but I know, if my company ever found out that I was using their network in such a way, immediate termination would be the response.
And remember, don’t think companies, think corporations or a conglomerate of companies. If your security level is high enough, you could literally logon to dozens of satelites companies and have dozens of pathways to a site.
With Nadya only being filmed only she is entitled to be paid for that time. Which got me to thinking. If the kids are not being filmed that day then the home cannot be considered their "workplace" even if cameras are present.
That got me to thinking that they don't have to use all 14 children at the same time. In fact that would be quite difficult. So,they can actually film quite a lot as long as they are using different sets of children.
If they are filming only the older six children then the octoplets aren't "at work" they are at home.
That got me to thinking how they define the workplace. It isn't necessarily the entire house. If filming is set up in the kitchen dining area then the rest of the house isn't "the workplace" just like having a home office doesn't mean your children are now in your work place throughout the entire house.
That could be true, but we don't know the wording in the contracts. And once the FG is assigned, will he have ability to negotiate for the children? Or will he in turn hire an 'Agent'? On and on.
Unforunately, when all is said and done, there could be many fingers in this pie. That's why singers, musicians and actors demand such high salaries. They have to pay everyone off.
And these people are a clique as well. Each has a piece of the pie. They will not deal with any other people. It's called job security.
That's why I said. She handled this all wrong. If she had just abided by the laws, she could have controlled it all.
I believe Mrs. Magoo said Mr. Magoo was a computer expert?
hhttp://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070926100134AAtrOHj
That's how when Mrs. Magoo actually lives in one country, her ISP shows up as in another. Just a guess. LOL
Glad you asked!!
Well let's see the new poll shows that approximately 10 percent* of folks would watch the documentary.
That means """loosely""" 20 million people would watch the documentary. I think that's a nice-sized audience and shows "interest". JMHO
And what does that have to do with the subject at hand?
I think it's making a really big assumption to take it for granted that an FG will be assigned.
Lots of people were predicting that CPS would take her children. That was Allred's first goal. I have said from day one that the state will not take her children and she will retain permanent custody because she is a "good enough" mother which is all she needs to be to keep her children. So far, I have been proven right.
I also predict that no financial guardian will be assigned because I see no evidence that she has misappropriated funds and in fact it looks like she has taken all the steps required to fully comply with the law from a financial perspective. It's a very serious step to take away a parent's right to oversee their children's money.
PS, I'd like for it to show here too so I could watch it but on the otherhand if she can make enough money elsewhere it's kind of the best of both worlds for the children.
Although it does sound like the show is going to be very different than the reality shows here. Nadya has said from the beginning that she only wanted documentary style shows on milestones not day to day stuff.
I think my numbers are way low Info. I bet it would be a huge audience. What they must do is not show any clips of the show, or not too many, before it airs.
Lots of those votes (the 90 percent) are from folks who do NOT want her to get a documentary under any circumstances so they voted no. They are totally against her getting a documentary and will not watch it no way, no how, right up until they watch it. I hope Nadya didn't sign a no compete or whatever that is and that she is open to other opportunties when they come about.
"if she can make enough money elsewhere it's kind of the best of both worlds for the children. "
That would be excellent. Writing a book wouldn't be invasive to the children. She could write many books over her lifetime.
PS, Bingo! And you doubted me. All the posts had the same theme. My mind could not wrap around the idea that there could be more than one poster with a mouth like that. The style of writing ws the same too.
I just had to research back in my brain's file of an instance that this senerio could be true. All I could visualize is someone trotting across the country. Not realistic. I had to go back to the early 90's and there it was.
I have to admit since I never used it, my mind chose to file this bit of knowledge way back. It took me peeling layers of education to find it.
That's the problem with Computer Services. The field advances expodentially and you have to have a quick mind to keep up. We all know that the PC that we bought today is already obsolete. Can you imagine keeping up with this on a day to day basis for 46 years? I'm really a geek aren't I.
I'm still not sure that Mafia Bee is Mrs. Magoo but we do know that Mrs. Magoo is hiding her true ISP address. That thanks to Mod Val who freely shared the information that Mrs. Magoo was not showing as being in the country she lives. No investigative skills needed for that. Just simply innocently reading posts.
PS- No offense, but I'd like to comment on this statement of yours.
I also predict that no financial guardian will be assigned because I see no evidence that she has misappropriated funds and in fact it looks like she has taken all the steps required to fully comply with the law from a financial perspective.
----
You see no evidence? I wasn't aware that any of us have seen any of her finances. How much she has made. . .tax ids. . .bank account . . .etc etc.
PS, make that 10 % of 304,059,724 - 2008 Census estimate.
True and we need to take in account the fact that that poll has people voting multiple times against the documentary. I know a mod of a board who used three different computers to vote and pretty much encouraging others to vote no multiple times also so the vote is way off.
"You see no evidence? I wasn't aware that any of us have seen any of her finances. How much she has made. . .tax ids. . .bank account . . .etc etc."
That was me not PS, and you made my point. People are posting as though an FG has already been appointed and the judge will just rubberstamp it. In my world people are innocent until proven guilty. There is no evidence that Nadya has done anything wrong financially. Whatever people think of Jeff he is a lawyer so I think he has made sure that Nadya's finances are in order and that any money that the children are entitled to are in Cougan accounts.
There was a report awhile back that Jeff had consulted with the Child Labor board or whatever it's called. Eyeworks seems to be doing everything properly. So basically based on what has happened so far I don't see a judge over-riding Nadya's parental rights. That's a very serious step that doesn't get taken lightly. It's possible, but no one has shown me information that suggests it's inevidable.
Sorry about that PS and Info! Was late last night and I guess I was tired.
I HOPE Nadya is looking out for those kids interests. I saw this because she doesn't seem to understand finances etc from what we have learned about her. Even if nothing happens in court, the Peterson/Allred suit at least will remind Nadya that there are those out there that are watching, and she needs to make sure she does things legally.
I'm not really sure she cares if she does things legally, once again from her family history and actions, or should I say possibly within the bounds of the laws but makes them work to her advantage.
I'm not so sure Czech is out of the children of Nadya. If so, he would have advised her on many of these things (and possibly many more we don't know about) before the fact. I have no quotes of his, but I can remember hearing him on the news many times, and wonder if he knew what he was talking about, or if Nadya and him were even communicating well.
It must be hard for a mother of 14 to hold a decent job that will make enough money to feed and clothe them all. And she needs to finish her college degree with not much time left over. The help she is receiving is very much appreciated I"m sure.When her nanny help runs out I hope there are people that will be willing to donate some time to help her. Grandpa can only help so much. Hopefully the book she will write and this documentary will give her enough funds to last a while till she can finish her schooling. We are all still waiting for court update.