Shreveport Times dumps Coulter's column...
Her syndicate may be sticking with her column but at least one of their clients is not. Here is what Executive Editor Alan English wrote about the decision:
Today we move past the rhetoric and unproductive dialogue offered by Ann Coulter. The Times is dropping her column effective immediately. It is her recent “joke” about John Edwards being considered a “faggot” that is the back-breaking straw for a decision we've openly discussed for some time. We had a dialogue with readers last year regarding whether Coulter was a responsible commentator and journalist.
Her repeated use of hyperbole in the call for the death of some journalists and politicians was beyond the pale. And while we all believe she was “just kidding,” her "shock-jock'' writing style is no different from Howard Stern's practical jokes and bathroom humor that aims to draw a school-yard snicker but falls well short of reasonable, thought-provoking journalism. Unlike the work of a Thomas Sowell or a Kathleen Parker, two thoughtful conservatives, does a Coulter column raise the level of discourse?
The answer: rarely.
...We are committed to providing a balance in commentary, so Coulter will be replaced by another conservative voice. ...Above all this isn't some liberal vendetta. If so, Coulter would have fallen off our pages years ago. Sure, The Times has supported what many perceive to be liberal ideas or politicians before, but we also have spoken for fiscal restraint and opposed certain taxes.
...For those who find affirmation and validity in Coulter diatribes, God bless you and keep you. But since last summer's open-air discussion of our reservations about continuing her column, you had to know it was only a matter of time before she rubbed a hole in the welcome mat. It even seems as if she was pushing to find the limit. Well ...



It's nothing new that Ann Coulter aims for the shocking and hyperbolic -- not to try to persuade anybody to adopt any of her views, nor to piss off non-conservatives, but for one reason and one reason only: to give voice to her ultra-conservative fan base's hateful viewpoints. She's just throwing the faithful a piece of meat, and it's a shame that she has to hurt others in the process. But her relevancy in the "culture war" is way, way, way below that of Bill O'Reilly, who has some pretense to championing the interests of the common man. Coulter is just out there to shock and say what her acolytes are thinking and probably not saying, since they'd be sued, fired and the like if they did. I don't know how serious she is about it, or if it's more calculated than that, but it gives so-called "conservatives" a bad name (and I put "conservatives" in quotes because there's nothing conservative about their radical viewpoints. Gerald Ford was a conservative, these people are plain nuts).