Should Diana Ross have stayed home?
After 45 years-plus of superstardom, it's not like Diana Ross can schlep around Beverly Hills without being noticed. But the supreme one looked anything but in these photos where she appears to be in need of a dye job, a bra, and her usual razzle dazzle. Miss Ross is 63 now and I'm sure upkeep is more difficult but this future Kennedy Center Honoree has set the standard for glam and it's kinda shocking to see her looking undone.
Still love her though...
4 Comments
Leave a comment
About Out
in Hollywood
Greg Hernandez authored Out In Hollywood for the Daily News from June 2006 to February 2009. He can now be found at Greg In Hollywood: www.greginhollywood.com
I've enjoyed you blog for a while now but please don't become some bitchy queen. You should look so good at 63 (or now for that matter!).
Yeah, it's funny, I think she looks amazing. Also please don't promote bra-wearing until you've worn one yourself. They are torture!
i think that Diana Ross is a remarkable entertainer and at this point she can do as she pleases. If she wants to come outside without being "properly groomed" as some would say...so be it... i think she deserves that much....
You know I just LOVE bitchy, but she doesn't really look bad for just bopping around doing errands. She's my mom's age for God's sake!