Missy Valencia commented on State of emergency
« January 9, 2008 | Main | January 11, 2008 »
Newsroom science chick Elise Kleeman forwards this interactive timeline of the legal battle maintained by the twenty-eight senior scientists and engineers at suing over "NASA's unconstitutional requirement of invasive background investigation."
One thing I've noticed about the Ron Paul phenomenon -- which has pulled numbers from the Left and Right with popular anti-administration, anti-war sentiments -- is how little many of his newfound supporters know about the man.
Speaking of not taking responsibility for one's printed material, The New Republic decodes some of the Ron Paul cipher:
((Be warned, TNR's server is being crunched by this))
James Kirchick writes:
Antiwar conservatives, disaffected centrists, even young liberal activists have all flocked to Paul, hailing him as a throwback to an earlier age, when politicians were less mealy-mouthed and American government was more modest in its ambitions, both at home and abroad.
The story lays a lot of foundation before getting to its "nut graf" that Kirchick found back copies of Ron Paul's various newsletters and found lots of anti-black, anti-gay and anti-Jewish rhetoric:
What they reveal are decades worth of obsession with conspiracies, sympathy for the right-wing militia movement, and deeply held bigotry against blacks, Jews, and gays. In short, they suggest that Ron Paul is not the plain-speaking antiwar activist his supporters believe they are backing--but rather a member in good standing of some of the oldest and ugliest traditions in American politics.
Team Ron's response: Story is a politically motivated rehash of old news about newsletters topped with "Dr. Paul's" name, but he was totally unaware of the content.
Many refuse to believe reporters have no say in the headlines selected (page designers and copy editors do their best to make something fit the space on deadlines of their own) but I'll take fault for the sub-hed "White won suit against city in 2004." She was terminated previously in 2004 and won the suit in 2007.
Kept rewriting the second paragraph, the "nut graf" which tells the reader "this is what this story is about."
Never too shy to pile on the appositives and dependent clauses at the expense of clarity, I'd left it at:
City officials said Wednesday they were reviewing a claim filed by Karin White alleging she was let go Aug. 30 in retaliation after a jury determined the department violated her privacy by illegally using wiretap evidence to justify a previous termination in 2004.
Which can be read several ways: Was the termination or the legal victory in 2004? Through no fault of an editor, it was streamlined to the latter:
City officials said Wednesday they were reviewing a claim filed by Officer Karin White in which she alleged she was wrongfully terminated on Aug. 30 in retaliation for prevailing against the city in a lawsuit in 2004.
Here's the story:
Officer claims wrongful firing White won suit against city in 2004 By Kenneth Todd Ruiz, Staff Writer Article Launched: 01/10/2008 12:36:30 AM PSTPASADENA -- One year after taking a bullet in the face from her own gun during a struggle with her son, a Pasadena police officer claims she has been wrongfully terminated by the department.
City officials said Wednesday they were reviewing a claim filed by Officer Karin White in which she alleged she was wrongfully terminated on Aug. 30 in retaliation for prevailing against the city in a lawsuit in 2004.
In that suit, a jury determined the Pasadena Police Department violated White's privacy by illegally using wiretap evidence to justify a previous termination in 2004.
Since hiring White in 1996, the department never disciplined White, according to the claim received Monday by the City Council.
Even so, White claims, the department "has repeatedly attempted to terminate her employment based upon alleged issues having nothing to do with either her performance, or ability to perform, her duties as a police officer."Her release from duty in August was the department's fifth attempt to fire her, according to the claim.
White declined to answer questions Wednesday and referred calls to her lawyer, Richard Love, who did not return calls seeking comment.
Claims such as White's are frequently "precursors to a lawsuit," said City Attorney Michele Bagneris.
As with any city employee, particularly police officers who are afforded special protection under state law, City Hall did its due diligence before releasing
Advertisement
White, Bagneris said.White, 43, spent much of last year on medical leave after "being shot in the face while preventing her son from committing suicide with a handgun," according to her claim.
Strange circumstances surrounded the June 2006 shooting incident at White's Compton home.
Initially reported as a suicide attempt by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, the injury left White unable to speak to investigators for nearly a month. When she recovered enough to be interviewed, White said her injury came while wresting her service handgun away from her adult son.
She now claims the Police Department defamed her by suggesting she "had lied to the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department and/or the Department" about the nature of her injury.
Soon after the shooting, police Chief Bernard Melekian called the shooting a "family tragedy."
"There is no immunity for police officers when it comes to the same family problems and traumas which we are sometimes called upon to resolve," he said in a July 2006 statement.
Melekian, currently Pasadena's acting city manager, confirmed White's recent termination but declined to comment Wednesday, citing potential litigation.
In 2004, White was fired after 25 wiretap recordings of White and her son's father, Anthony Williams, by the Drug Enforcement Agency and other agencies were used in an internal investigation that led to her dismissal.
She sued and was reinstated after a jury ruled the evidence was illegally used. White's claims of discrimination and harassment because of her disability were dismissed.
A jury awarded White $1 million in April of last year. State law tripled that to $3 million.
This past June, a judge ordered a new trial, unless White agreed to accept a reduced award of $150,000, according Bagneris.
Appeals from both sides are now wending their way through the system.
"It won't be until the end of the year before there's any results," Bagneris said.
A series of unfortunate incidents punctuating White's 11 years with the department are detailed in the claim.
Her knee was injured while subduing a suspect in 1998. A year later, she was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. In 2000, her wrist was broken and knees injured when a car collided with her patrol car.
Her current claim seeks unspecified damages for economic losses exceeding $595,000, emotional distress and loss of reputation.
todd.ruiz@sgvn.com
(626) 578-6300, Ext. 4444
www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics
I'm going to tell my creditors I've declared a Fiscal Emergency. Everyone's doing it.
Gov. Schwarzenegger Proposes Budget, Declares Fiscal Emergency, Calls Special Session to Immediately Address Current Year ShortfallGovernor’s Budget Reforms Increase Fiscal Responsibility, Restrain Spending
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger today submitted his proposed budget for 2008-09, which addresses the systemic problems that drive California’s chronic deficits. At the same time, Governor Schwarzenegger issued proclamations (attached) declaring a fiscal emergency and calling a special session of the legislature to address the current year $3.3 billion budget gap.
Governor Schwarzenegger’s 2008-09 budget proposal takes the difficult but necessary steps California needs to rein in the state deficit and stabilize the budget without raising taxes.
“We are facing a very tough situation, but with tough times come historic opportunities. I am convinced the legislature will help turn today’s temporary problem into a permanent victory for the people of California by joining me to enact true budget reform,” said Governor Schwarzenegger. “We simply cannot have a budget system where revenues and spending are not tied together. We must rise to the challenge and fix California’s budget system once and for all.”