Gold Line fight brewing up again

| | Comments (4) |

A few days back a couple of San Gabriel Valley politicians had something of a mock round table where they criticized the MTA for not funding the Gold Line. Steve Hymon, at the Bottleneck Blog, posted the video on his site. He pointed out, hilariously, that the interviewer at the round table, who lobbed soft-ball questions at congress members David Dreier, Adam Schiff, Grace Napolitano, and Hilda Solis. The interviewer who was not identified in the video, Hymon points out, was Dreier;s press secretary Jo Maney.

It didn't garner that much attention from the general public, but it was enough to get MTA chief Roger Snoble steamed up. He had his staff dispatch a letter that Snoble wrote to Dreier about the Gold Line to multiple media sources, myself included. Basically, it argues, that the Federal Transit Administration is not only not guaranteeing the $320 million in funding that San Gabriel Valley politicians claim it is, but that they are not at all likely to provide the funding. A selected part of the text:

It is likely to be many years at best before the Foothill project completes the lengthy and rigorous New Starts process, assuming the FTA allows the project to remain under consideration. Given the intense level of competition for limited federal resources among a large number of proposed projects nationwide, combined with uncertainty surrounding the future of the New Starts program, success is far from guaranteed and in fact may prove to be elusive. On the other hand, a successful outcome with the sales tax measure will mean the Foothill project will soon become a reality.

Notice that the MTA is not-so-subtly pushing the sales tax measure as an alternative to any up-front commitment to the Gold Line, which is exactly what San Gabriel Valley politicians have been demanding as the price for their support of the sales tax.

In the letter (which is hard to reproduce in full because it is a pdf file) Snoble also says the project has received a "medium-low" financial rating from the FTA, and that it will require a "medium" rating to move forward.

I hope to find out a little more precisely what exactly that means.... stay tuned. It might be time to get some answers from the FTA about this project.

4 Comments

eric said:
This extension is not needed beyind Azusa. Metrolink already duplicates many of the stops beyond Azusa that are planned, I think people could transfer to Metrolink easily and leave it at that. The political moves by the San Gabriel elected officials and the foothill extension board lead me to strongly oppose any funding to this project (beyond Azusa that is). Playing political games with the people of LA county shows the distasteful and dishonest tactics of this group. Just because you want something, does not mean it is needed. There are many more pressing mass transit problems in LA county that deserve the MTA's full attention and funding.
Cat said:
I can't quite figure out how commuters are supposed to easily transfer from the Gold Line station in Azusa to a Metrolink station five or six miles away? The Metrolink and Gold Line stations only duplicate in the Pomona/Claremont area.It's so easy for Mr. Snoble to matter of factly plan to pay for the Foothill Extension from an additional money grab that is by no means a sure bet. And if the tax hike does pass there isn't anything that insures that all that money goes to the projects listed. We can all watch the money flow elsewhere...as it always does. The Metro board could responsibly make an essentially risk free decision to put up transit money that has already in their coffers, as a match to try for a federal money. You can bet they'll be doing that for Expo II if this sales tax scheme fails. And are we to believe Mr. Snoble knows better than the four congressmen what the FTA may or may not do for a rail project that not only moves people, but is the catalyst for billions of dollars in local investment?
Ellen said:
Here are some facts to consider: First, the Gold Line Foothill Extension gets $735 million under the sales tax bill - twice what the legislation originally contemplated, and more than the hoped-for federal match. The sales tax bill lists various projects to be completed with sales tax revenues, of which the Gold Line is one. The dollar figures listed are a minimum that must be applied to each project. The bill further provides that Metro shall complete all of the projects and programs listed as a condition of the use and expenditure of the proceeds of the tax. Second, if the sales tax measure based on the bill gains voter approval, it will take a 2/3 vote of the Metro Board, after a noticed public meeting, to change the dollar allocations for each project - a high threshold to meet. Plus, Metro has to give the Legislature one year notice before making any such change to a project on the expenditure plan's project list. No amendments reducing allocations may be made prior to 2019, or once in a decade thereafter. Finally, there will be an annual audit of expenditures by an impartial panel to be created under the sales tax measure, as well as an independent citizen's advisory and oversight committee.
Dog Spot said:
Ellen: Here's some facts for you to consider: 1) Of the $735 million allocated to the Gold Line Extension, about $150 million goes towards building a rail yard in Irwindale--leaving only about $585 million for the extension of the Gold Line to Claremont--not enough. 2) A 2/3 vote for project changes sounds awfully high, except when one looks at the composition of the MTA Board of Directors, and then a 2/3 vote against the San Gabriel Valley is very easily obtainable. 3) The creation of a "citizen's committee" to review expenditures means absolutely nothing--I have yet to see a similar group creatd under any taxing or bonding measure that ever publicly challenged official spending decisions. 4) Adding an audit item to the bill means nothing either. Supposedly, both Propositions A & C (LA County's other, in-perpetuity transportation sales tax measures) are audited each year--has anyone seen these audits, or have they ever been released?

Leave a comment

UNDER THE DOME

Dan Abenschein
Pasadena -- news, politics and gossip. Send tips, rumors, rants to Dan Abendschein dan.abendschein@sgvn.com.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Dan Abendschein published on August 28, 2008 5:16 PM.

The political principle: no tolls on taxpayer-built roads was the previous entry in this blog.

Palin as VP: local reaction article under way is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

Dog Spot on Gold Line fight brewing up again: Ellen: Here's some facts for you to consider: 1) Of the $735 million ...

Ellen on Gold Line fight brewing up again: Here are some facts to consider: First, the Gold Line Foothill Extensi ...

Cat on Gold Line fight brewing up again: I can't quite figure out how commuters are supposed to easily transfer ...

eric on Gold Line fight brewing up again: This extension is not needed beyind Azusa. Metrolink already duplicat ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.1

Links

Our SGVN blogs

Hallway Monitor
Caroline An's experiences the Pasadena Unified School District.
The Public Eye
SGVN Public Editor Larry Wilson muses on life, newspapering and the Velvet Underground.
Scott Galetti Talks Prep Sports What else is there to say? Scott's a cool guy who posts about local prep sports.
Crime Scene
Tribune crime guy Frank Girardot wants to know where the bodies are and what they're stuffed into.
Editors' Corner
Edward Barrera and Kate Kealey, las editors libres, reflect on the news in general with a dash of newsroom insidering.
Leftovers from City Hall
More city hall news and tidbits from around the Valley, brought to you by reporters Jennifer McLain and Tania Chatila.
Fred Robledo Talks Prep Sports
Tribune sports dude Fred Robledo's monster prep sports blog.

Advertisement

Headlines

Other blogs

CIF-SS preseasonTop 10s: Only five locals acknowledged in Roger Murray talks Prep Sports
Blogging from the RNC in Hallway Monitor
Thanks for reading in Under the Dome
NFL, ABC-7 honors San Gabriel coach Keith Jones in From the sidelines with Miguel Melendez
Have a great Labor Day in A View from the Heights