Returning from a week's absence, I had a message (not a massage) from the Pasadena City Attorney's office explaining new records were available per a request I'd made.
Weighing in at $35 in copying charges, the documents couldn't be the list of city-owned cell phones I'd requested -- and am still waiting on.
Turns out they're the same documents -- now in unredacted format -- that I wrote about on May 27. (Story posted after the jump as it's fallen, unlinkable, into the newspaper's pay-to-play archive. AKA "The Abyss.")
Have members of Pasadena's City Council -- who often strain to accommodate their most vocal citizens -- applied a double standard to the Northwest? Has developer Danny Bakewell fomented racial discord -- as he has been famously accused of in the past -- to game the system?
Although the stakeholders involved may largely fall down racial lines, reality is usually more complex than, well, black and white.
Despite reams of policy and plans general, development drives politics. Pick up any newspaper and read stories about buildings. Buildings and corruption.
Healthy, journalistic skepticism has no better application than where those two tangle: politicians and developers. Their symbiotic relationships come into conflict with an open, accountable and minimally corrupt Democracy.
So, apparently, the City Attorney's office reconsidered its position that it was not in the public interest to release the super-secret evaluation forms -- without names redacted -- of the special commission that reviewed four proposals for Heritage Square project.
Heritage Square is currently a square block o' blight at Fair Oaks and Orange Grove, technically owned by said public and worth $13.4 million.
Those evaluation forms served as the commission's vote, which has served as the basis for why the council should rubber stamp its recommendation to move forward with the Bakewell Company.
Which could very well be best-suited for the job.
But government isn't supposed to happen in secret. Does public scrutiny slow things down? Make government less "efficient?" More susceptible to lobbyists? Absolutely. But also slightly less susceptible to greed, mendacity and corruption? That's the idea.
Now if only Charlie Munger would buy the Star-News and hire 20 more reporters.
UPDATED: I received a June 4 letter with the phone list.
Continue reading "Change of heart" »