Schipske proposes more public scrutiny of worker contract negotiations

Previous Entry | Next Entry
| | Comments (3) |

Fifth District Long Beach City Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske today announced she is proposing that the council place a charter amendment on the ballot that would open up the process of negotiating contracts with city employee associations to more public scrutiny. The announcement comes a day before the council is to vote on new contracts that include pay freezes for six employee associations. Schipske's item won't be heard by the council until next week. Following is Schipske's press release in its entirety.

Fifth District Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske is placing an item on the Council agenda which she calls the "Public Pay Bargaining Sunshine Requirements" that if approved by the City Council and the voters would open up the process utilized by the Council in negotiating wages, benefits and working conditions with city public employees.

"The public is clamoring for transparency and input --not only of what the City negotiates but how much it costs the city for the agreements over the life of the agreements and whether or not the city can afford the agreements," says Schipske.

Currently, state law requires that the collective bargaining process for employees in higher education and employees in school districts provide for the "sun shining" of initial proposals for negotiations, including re-openers as well as proposals that arise later in the course of bargaining. The laws also require a delay after the proposals are presented at a public meeting to allow the public to become informed and provide input regarding the proposals. Additionally, in the case of schools districts, the Superintendent must disclose the costs of the contract and certify that the costs of the contract can be met by the school district during the term of the agreement.

Schipske points out that public employee collective bargaining is regulated by state law -- the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act which is found in the Government Code. Enforcement of this law is done by the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB), the same agency which regulates labor laws for teachers, faculty members and employees of public universities and schools.

Government Code Section 3547 provides for the public disclosure of any proposals being negotiated between school district and their public employees and the requirement that the public have an opportunity to express itself regarding the proposals at a public meeting.

"The Government also requires school districts to publicly disclose the costs that would be incurred under the agreement for the life of the contract and to certify that the school district can cover the costs of the contract," Schipske explains. "I have advocated for this at the city government level even before I was elected to the City Council."

"Opening up the process to the public is needed. There isn't any reason that our City Council cannot do the same as is required by the Long Beach Unified School District," Schipske adds. "Nothing in the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act which governs labor relations of municipalities prohibits the City from adopting the same requirements for public disclosure and input."

Schipske says that the California Supreme Court has been favorable to the public disclosure requirements of the school districts in its rulings: "Thus, although the public is excluded from actual negotiating sessions . . . its opportunity to be fully informed and to express its views is preserved." San Mateo City School District v. PERB, 33 Cal.3d 850, 864 (1983).

"I hope my colleagues and the voters agree to let the sunshine in on this process."

3 Comments

Gary DeLong said:

Sounds good to me.

Gary DeLong
Councilmember, 3rd District

Tired of Schipske's Meaningless Agenda Items said:

I wonder if Councilperson Schipske has ever taken into account the cost in City staff time her "agenda items" actually cost tax payers and if we'd be better served by "agenda items" that actually solved problems rather than creating them. I have no interest in paying for sunshine.

Gerrie Schipske said:

Sorry to disagree with the person making the anonymous comment.

On the contrary to his opinion, opening the bargaining process will save money for the taxpayers and so far my emails and response to my survey on this issue are running over 85% in favor of the proposal.

Perhaps you might want to keep in mind every school district, university and community college district do exactly what I am proposing to do. So what makes the city so special that we cannot use the same process to bring transparency to the bargaining process?

The sad fact about blogs is that one can always count on nasty comments from those not brave enough to use their real names. Which could be why in this case the person making the comments isn't interested in 'sunshine' or transparency. Guess it hits too close to home.

Leave a comment

About the Bloggers

Paul Eakins reports on Long Beach City Hall, and local and regional politics. A newcomer to the Press-
Telegram, he previously has covered local and state government and politics in San Diego County, Mexico and his home state of Kansas.

E-mail Paul at paul.eakins@presstelegram.com.


Kris Hanson reports on the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles, covering environmental issues, economic triumphs and pitfalls and trade trends of America’s largest port. He also writes a weekly column “On The Waterfront”, appearing Tuesdays, and also produces an occassional video and column titled “On The Job,” which follows the hard-working men and women who keep Southern California’s economy humming.

E-mail Kris at kristopher.hanson@
presstelegram.com
.


Karen Robes Meeks came to work for the Press-
Telegram in April 2002 as a beat reporter, covering the cities of Lakewood, Bellflower and Paramount. She now covers business, specifically redevelopment, tourism and small businesses. She also writes Eye on Redevelopment, a monthly column that appears in the Business Monday section.

E-mail Karen at karen.robes@presstelegram.com.


About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Paul Eakins published on October 12, 2009 12:04 PM.

No deal reached on IAM contract despite furlough threat was the previous entry in this blog.

Audit: 'High risk of fraud' in LB towing operations is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.25