So now we know why Hollywood shouldn’t make any “issue? flicks: Because the Oscar will invariably go to the most obvious one of the bunch. “Crash? beat out what to my mind seemed a largely superior roster of movies for the Best Picture trophy; it was easily the least nuanced and tricky of the bunch, letting viewers know precisely how they were supposed to feel every step of the way, even having characters baldly state its themes. But, hey, now that it’s officially 2005’s Best Picture, here’s something that makes me look a fool.
Crash and burn, baby, burn
If you think that’s bad, here’s a really virulent and, to be honest, much better argued, attack on the film:
Crushing Crash
Oh, well, good on Lionsgate, the little studio that could. But this does kind of point out how the Oscar campaign can be affected by the time frame in which it’s conducted, how Academy voters can be put off when they hear too much about how a certain movie is a shoo-in. (In a way, though, it’s reassuring to know that even Hollywood can get sick of hearing about itself.) “Brokeback Mountain? won virtually every major (and minor) award there was to win this year, except the one that counts, the one that puts it in the history books. This is kind of reminiscent of the year “Saving Private Ryan? was considered the prohibitive favorite – until it wasn’t, and “Shakespeare in Love,? tortoise-and-hare-like, slipped away with the Best Picture trophy.
No rule changes need be made, I’d say, because “quality? is hardly an objective, uh, quality, and people whose favorites fail to win Oscars are usually over it by the next morning. But there might be a lesson here for future Oscar campaigners: Don’t strive for frontrunner status too early; don’t be a juggernaut (be glad if other groups spread the wealth by honoring other films); and, for God’s sake, don’t make a movie that both manages to commandeer the Zeitgeist and provide late-night comics with endless one-liners, because by Oscar night, people will be absolutely sick of hearing about it.