Las Vegas 7, Reign 3.

The Reign’s home woes continued in the form of their ninth loss in 10 tries at The Bank.

Coming off a fight-filled, emotionally charged win Saturday in Utah, none of it translated to Wednesday’s game. Las Vegas scored three goals in the first 6:34 – two on the power play – and never looked back.

The Reign got the game as close as 5-3 late in the third period, but Vegas killed two Reign power plays and scored twice late to turn the game into a blowout.

Dusty Collins, Jordan Morrison and Chaz Johnson scored for the Reign, who put only 15 shots on Michael Ouzas – one off their season low. Kellen Briggs allowed all seven goals on 26 Wranglers shots, but could share the blame for all seven.

Las Vegas was missing its leading scorer, Ned Lukacevic, who had flu-like symptoms.

More in tomorrow’s editions of the Sun and Daily Bulletin.

This entry was posted in Ontario Reign/ECHL and tagged , , by J.P. Hoornstra. Bookmark the permalink.

About J.P. Hoornstra

J.P. Hoornstra covers the Dodgers, Angels and Major League Baseball for the Orange County Register, Los Angeles Daily News, Long Beach Press-Telegram, Torrance Daily Breeze, San Gabriel Valley Tribune, Pasadena Star-News, San Bernardino Sun, Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, Whittier Daily News and Redlands Daily Facts. Before taking the beat in 2012, J.P. covered the NHL for four years. UCLA gave him a degree once upon a time; when he graduated on schedule, he missed getting Arnold Schwarzenegger's autograph on his diploma by five months.
  • Filmy bezlimit

    The core of your writing while appearing agreeable initially, did not work very well with me after some time. Someplace throughout the paragraphs you were able to make me a believer but just for a while. I still have got a problem with your leaps in assumptions and one would do nicely to fill in those breaks. In the event you can accomplish that, I would definitely end up being amazed.

  • Gry Online

    With almost everything which seems to be building within this particular subject matter, many of your points of view happen to be rather exciting. On the other hand, I beg your pardon, because I can not give credence to your entire theory, all be it radical none the less. It appears to everybody that your comments are actually not totally justified and in actuality you are yourself not really completely certain of the point. In any event I did take pleasure in reading through it.