To live or not live in San Bernardino

| | Comments (11) |

Below is a story I wrote in 2007.

The basic premise is that in San Bernardino, the city with the highest public safety spending in the county (more than $90 million), an incredibly low proportion of the personnel live in the city.

That, say some, may adversely affect the city's economy, government revenue and development prospects because such a tremendous portion of the city's budget is bled away to nearby cities. Obviously, the millions that leave with the public safety officials who live elsewhere don't come back, not through property, sales taxes or consumer spending.

At the same time, it is important to note that public safety employees, and any city employees for that matter, live elsewhere not out of malice or lacking civic duty, but because of personal decisions about families, finances and living comfort. San Bernardino isn't on any best-places-to-live lists.

Obviously, the lack of public safety and other government workers in the city (public safety workers from other cities don't live here, either) has a social cost as well, depriving communities of stable, educated families who would contribute in myriad ways.


So, click below to read full article ...

By Robert Rogers

SAN BERNARDINO — Eager to beef up its ranks, the Fire Department hired 18 firefighters in 2005-06.

Like more than nine out of 10 of their colleagues in the department, the new recruits don’t live in San Bernardino, the city whose taxpayers provide their checks, benefits and pensions.

Gone are the days when this town, once a dusty railroad outpost with a reputation for grit and self-reliance, used its homegrown stock to shoulder its fire and police services — or any services, for that matter.

Since 1999, the city’s public-safety expenses have almost doubled, to $90 million, meaning that the overwhelming majority of city expenditures wind up spent in the other cities where the employees have opted to take up residence.

But what do those expenses have to do with the firefighters not living in town?

Over roughly that same period, crime has leapt while the economy has languished, especially in some city pockets. No one links crime hikes to public safety hikes, but with so little of the city’s payments circulating back in through property taxes and discretionary expenses, at the very least the public employee exodus from San Bernardino hasn’t helped.

That situation coupled with non-residency rates for city’s $60-plus million Police Department similar to those in fire, elicit a mix of concern and resignation from city leaders and independent observers over what it all means to San Bernardino — and what to do about it.

The stage may be set for city leaders to wrestle with the costs of supporting an out-of-town workforce.
Some say high rates of non-residency by well-paid civic workers may have significant negative effects on the city’s economy, schools and general socioeconomic health.

Others, including regional economic expert John Husing, caution that as public employee unions, especially fire and police, gain more power over local politics, the fact that they represent people who work but don’t live in the city could put a strain on local democracy — a modern case of representation without taxation.

But little is being done about it.

“At this time, there is no policy nor any incentive regarding fire personnel living in the city,” said Fire Chief Mike Conrad.

“We have no legal authority to require anything (about where firefighters live),” Conrad added.

Conrad has mixed feelings. He says residency does not affect his department’s ability to respond to emergencies because firefighters live at local stations while on duty. But, he says, he will push to bolster youth recruitment like explorer programs and local-outreach programs to cultivate homegrown talent.

The problem, Conrad said, is that demand for qualified personnel consistently outpaces local supply, forcing the department to look at the entire Western U.S. for new recruits.

According to the Fire Department, just 7 percent, or 12, of its 164 sworn personnel in the $30 million Fire Department, live in San Bernardino. Conrad and his top command staff call other cities home.

But he acknowledges what others say more forcefully.

“he benefit of having some attachment to the community where one works … is probably of value,” Conrad said.

What firefighters don’t have, Conrad said, is the reason given by police leaders as to why such a low percentage of its 326-member force may not live in the city they are paid to protect — that they and their families may be exposed to retribution by the criminals they bust daily.

San Bernardino is by no means alone in its struggle to keep its finest living, not just working, in town. In Rialto, only two of 75 firefighters live in the city. One is the chief, Steve Wells, a lifelong resident who says, unlike Conrad, that residency plays absolutely no role in how firefighters do their jobs.

“Once their on the job, where they live when they’re not working is no factor at all,” Wells said.
Officials in Ontario Fire Department would not disclose how many of their firefighters lived in the city, but did acknowledge that the ratio was lower than 10 percent.

But it’s not just fire and police, officials say. Although City Manager’s Office representatives said they could not provide residency statistics, other city officials say it is likely that most of the 1,498 men and women on the city’s payroll live elsewhere.

Finding local applicants is a challenge, particularly for positions requiring a high level of skill, officials say.
“As a resident and an elected official, it bothers me tremendously that more of our public employees don’t live in the city — and that’s across the board in all departments,” said City Attorney James F. Penman.

But Penman — who specifically excuses police for what he calls “special dangers” — says that community members and civic employees tell him that a series of factors make the city an undesirable place to live.

“What I hear from people who won’t live in town or want to move out of town is that they feel the city is too pro-parolee, too responsive to the desires of the illegal (immigrant) community, and plagued by gangs and crime … and that their children will not be safe in the schools,” Penman said.
A look at a nearby Fire Department may support those claims.

In Redlands, renowned for its quality of life and good schools, about one-third of the firefighters and their families live in the city.

Husing said flight from San Bernardino by the highly-paid, highly-politically powerful public safety workforce negatively impacts San Bernardino in several ways.

Employees in these well-paid fields — sworn fire and police staff have minimum starting salaries of more than $50,000 annually, as well as strong benefit packages — may drain the city economically by living and shopping elsewhere, Husing said.

There is a steep social cost as well, Husing added, as these educated and stable men and women and their families are themselves valuable resources for the communities and school systems in which they participate.

City Councilman Neil Derry, who has enjoyed solid, and financial, support from both the police and fire unions for years, admitted that non-residency hurts the city’s economy, but said the problem is far broader than cops and firefighters.

“The problem is that young professionals in all sectors have left San Bernardino,” Derry said. “The city should work on having the kind of safety, housing, shopping and other benefits that those sorts of residents would want.”

But even Derry, who describes himself as “libertarian” on most issues, said he would support a financial incentive package to lure public employees to sink roots within city limits.

“I would support spending some money on something like that,” Derry said. “It could be worth it, we’ve been too penny wise pound foolish over the years.”

But Derry and Husing’s views dovetail from there. Particularly disturbing to Husing, but not to Derry, is the political dynamic created when an interest-group wields tremendous clout in a city where so few of its members live.

“In San Bernardino, you have police and fire departments with strong, well-financed unions representing workers who don’t live there but have enormous power over who gets elected in city government,” Husing said. “That is disturbing.”

One obvious example is Measure Z, a voter-approved sales-tax increase for public safety. The police union contributed to the campaign, and, thanks to City Council votes by members whose campaigns the union has financed, the Police Department is already benefitting from new projected tax proceeds with everything from state-of-the-art bulletproof vests to new police cars and overtime pay. The expenses are a tax others will pay to provide the department more funds.

Politics aside, Husing said the city is wracked by an economic loss because it is unlikely that public employees from other cities live in San Bernardino to offset local employees who live elsewhere, a problem that similarly afflicts Rialto, for instance.

In Redlands, however, police and fire employee from other cities live there to offset the two-thirds of the fire and roughly half of the police department who live outside the city.

Not so in San Bernardino.

"The taxpayers are, to some degree, supporting the economies of the cities where (San Bernardino) police and fire workers live and spend.”

Husing, who has been a supporter of Mayor Pat Morris’ anti-crime campaign, said its long-term success is probably the best answer to drawing public professionals back to the city.

Some cities offer financial incentives to encourage public servants to plant roots there. San Bernardino does not, except in rare cases for department heads.

Penman said incentive packages might draw a few more employees, but with negligible effect.
He said he does what he can at the City Attorney’s Office.

“If I’m looking at applicants and it’s close competition, I’ll hire the one that lives in the city,” Penman said.
But the tide of public professionals calling another municipality home seems inexorable, Penman added.

“There are people like myself who have been here forever and just love this town; we’re not going anywhere,” Penman said.

“But I find myself constantly defending San Bernardino and trying to convince people to stay.”


[TAG1]Contact writer Robert Rogers at (909) 386-3855 or via e-mail at robert.rogers@sbsun.com.

Full Disclosure: The author of this report, Robert Rogers, lives in a Fontana apartment.

11 Comments

Steve Wimer said:

San Bernardino needs to get tough on indigents, illegals, and criminals. Neighborhood communication? No, the people need tough love.

resident said:

Many cities have a requirement that department heads live within the city, but San Bernardino doesn't even have that! The Chief of Police doesn't even live here!

resident said:

The City of Banning gives resident employees a utility credit. Perhaps Berdoo needs to consider incentives for employees who live there!

ex-resident said:

I used to live in San Bernardino. Got out a year ago, and the best decision of my life. The feeling of oppresion, the lack of business, the way that city hall squeezes (extortes) busineses drives them out of SB. Micael Billdt, the San Bernardino police Chief lives in Redlands, no kids, it's just his choice. He lived in Redlands when he was single too. 90% of the cops don't live in SB, why? because they can come in, work, not care and go back to Yucaipa. SB is a sad place to live, work and I don't blame anyone who gets out. The cops who work there need to live there, so that they are accountable to the community that pays them.

Anonymous said:

fire chief AND police chief are out of towners??? Unbelievable. No excuse for for both of these crucial positions to be occupied by guys who live far away. That's embarrassing.

This city has no incentive for employees to live here. Just another bad policy.

george said:

If more people would get involved in the community, San Bernardino would not be such a "sad place to live".

That includes Chief Billdt. He is supposed to be in charge to the Police Department, which is running the Police Activities League. He should be the first volunteer. He is getting a paycheck from this city - he should start volunteering to make this a better place to live. AND he should live here too!

How can he expect his officers to do what he doesn't?

Anonymous said:

Great piece. Not having some kind of incentive program for all these new firefighters and police officers were hiring to live here in our city is a big mistake. Next article should be about whose asleep at the wheel.

oldcynic said:

I worked in downtown San Bernardino for over 30 years and lived in San Bernardino two-thirds of that time.
During the time my family and I lived in San Bernardino our house was burglarized three times (we finally put bars on it like a prison), I was physically assaulted ones, we had three major thefts from our property, our cars were broken into countless times, one night we found a vagrant asleep in the front yard. Finally, enough being enough, we moved out of town. The morning after we put the house up for sale, there was graffiti on the "for sale" sign. Why would anyone want to live in a cesspool like that? And we lived in a "better" part of town! In the 15 years since we moved to an adjoining city, thank goodness, we have not been crime victims.
Even though we no longer live in San Bernardino, we have continued to be active in church and several civic organizations and lodges in San Bernardino. I believe many of the people who are mainstays of San Bernardino's remaining civic life are, like us, former residents who have fled the city.
San Bernardino's municipal government is led by people like Patrick Morris who, while well-meaning, are delusional when it comes to the realities of life in their community.
San Bernardino is in the grasp of people who are of an evil mindset who resist being rehabilitated or reformed by missionary efforts. Things have gone too far. It is going to take a great deal more than a combination of Jane Addams and Pollyanna to cleanse the atmosphere in San Bernardino. Hoodlums are going to have to fear substantive punishment for their socially outrageous behavior before things turn around.
As things are now, decent people cannot abide San Bernardino unless they are too poor or too elderly to move.

scott appleton said:

well said old cynic!

Mr. Rogers, out of curiosity, do you live within San Bernardino's city limits?

You take a lot of time to bash the fire and police personnel, and I am curious to know if you live, or have lived in san bernardino.

I lived in san bernardino for 15 years before i was forced to move due to the crime in that city. I still work there, and am proud of the efforts of all of our public servants!

I don't remember any of the firefighters fighting the Panorama, Old Fire, or the last year's Little Mountain fire with any less aggression than a fire that may have occurred in a community that consisted solely of firefighters.

I don't remember any police officer involved in many situations last year being any less diligent chasing murderer suspects, robbery suspects and violent felons than a community that is full of police officers. (The Turner's gun store robbery comes to mind, or even the rolling gun battle that they had on Lynwood Street)

Instead of bashing the people that chose to work in professions that everybody is not cut out to do, I would just ask that you say "thank you" to these men and women, and quit trying to exploit them through your tabloidesque style of journalism.

Mr. Rogers, have you ever fought a fire, had a roof collapse on you, been shot, shot at, had a career ending injury (carpal tunnel does not qualify), as a result of protecting the citizens of San Bernardino during the course of your employment?

I challenge you to start writing about issues that will help build this community and not divide it any further.

thank you.

Anonymous said:

Mr. Appleton,

Happy to answer your questions and accusations, although I think the ad hominem attacks a bit out of line. Better to focus on the issues.

First off, yes, I have been shot at. I was caught in a driveby in June 2006 at the corner of 14th and Lugo while interviewing a mother and her child in front of a suspected drug house. I wasn't hit, but I wrote a long story about the ordeal. I walk San Bernardino's toughest streets rather often, usually alone, always unarmed. I don't live in fear. I don't fear people. Not because I'm tough or I have guns, but because I think it weak and dispiriting to live my life and do my work while afraid of others. Call it naive if you wish. I know by your little swipe at carpel tunnel that you think that somehow I'm less worthy or macho than a firefighter or a police officer. That's fine. Everyone has their Idols, I guess. You are entitled to yours.


Second, I live in a Fontana apartment, which I wrote in the article (guess you missed that). Of course, the subject of this article is public employees, of which I am not. I am not an employee of San Bernardino city taxpayers. I consider myself beholden to San Bernardino County readers.

The point here is not to "bash" anyone, but take a serious and objective look at what impacts San Bernardino might face by having the misfortune of almost all its public safety employees living elsewhere. I never suggested that public safety professionals don't work as hard because it's not their city. That was your insinuation. I do suggest that their absence - from new hires to six-figure leaders - from the city during off hours costs the city economically and socially, because it does.

As for the Turner Gun Store Robbery (in which two young suspects were killed), I'm not sure what that is supposed to indicate. Again, I've never suggested that officers and firefighters don't generally do their jobs well.

As for gushing servile "thank yous" to public officials, as you suggest I do, that's not going to happen.

Instead, the most worthy thanks I can give is an objective, steely-eyed look at the work they do, the impacts they have on the taxpayers wallets, and the things they say and do publicly. That is not only a "thank you," that's the least I owe our readers.

Thank you,

Robert

oldcynic said:

I think that the quality of occupational commitment of a public safety employee, or a newspaper reporter, should not be judged on the basis on whether he chooses to live, or not to live, in San Bernardino. (People's job status shifts. People have family ties which are difficult to break to communities other than the one in which they work.) But I do find it curious that newly hired department heads and newspaper executives, when confronted with a fresh chapter in their lives, almost invariably choose not to live in San Bernardino. Intended or not, it is a reflection of no confidence in the community. Any community, to be healthy, needs a population that is balanced among all classes. When the beau monde pointedly avoid a locality, it sends an unmistakable signal of degringolade.

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

About SB Now Blog

Andrew Edwards. E-mail Andrew here.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Robert Rogers published on February 15, 2008 7:26 PM.

The economics of local public safety was the previous entry in this blog.

The costs of fire is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.1

Headlines

Other blogs

Post-Practice Update in Inside USC with Scott Wolf
Tiger plays caddie for a day in In The Rough
Why the long face? Not horse friendly? in Farther Off the Wall
Not so Ducky in Inside UCLA with Brian Dohn
Back to Budaj in Inside the Kings

Advertisement