Rail yard story
By Andrew Edwards
Staff Writer
SAN BERNARDINO -- Air pollution cutbacks can't come soon enough for several people who live near BNSF Railway's yard here.
Westside residents crowded the council chambers at City Hall Wednesday night to demand air quality improvements around their neighborhoods.
State regulators and BNSF employees heard about three hours from angry, frightened and impassioned words from people who demanded to know why the best possible technology could not be purchased for the San Bernardino rail yard at the earliest possible time.
Wednesday's meeting followed the release of a draft cleanup plan that sets targets for emissions reductions to be achieved in 2015 and 2020. Although BNSF executive Mark Stehly took pains to point out the rail company has tried to cut pollution since 2005, but many in the audience remained upset by having to wait for more breathable air.
"Does one of your children have to suffer from cancer so you can take awareness?," one audience member asked Stehly and the regulators who attended the Wednesday night meeting.
Cancer risks around BNSF's San Bernardino yard have come to attention after the California Air Resources Board released the draft a study called a Health Risk Assessment in April. The report, which relied on 2005 data, concluded that emissions from trains, trucks and other vehicles in and around the 168-acre railyard present elevated cancer risks to people who live in the surrounding neighborhood.
In 2005, engines coughed up 33 tons of diesel particulate matter within one mile of the San Bernardino yard. Researchers used a mathematical formula to show that in a worst-case scenario, diesel pollution increases the cancer risk by 500 chances or more per million cases for about 3,800 people who are the rail yard's closest neighbors.
The increased risk is above what 1,000 in one million cancer risk that regulators call the background level within the South Coast Air Basin of Southern California. The background level is the cancer risk that residents face simply for living in the Inland Empire or greater Los Angeles.
Harold Holmes Jr., the California Air Resources Board's engineering evaluation manager, said Wednesday that cancer risks around the San Bernardino yard are expected to be reduced by 85 percent by 2020.
At Wednesday's meeting, regulators expressed agreement with residents that the current cleanup timeline is not fast enough, but also said the current technology levels do not make it feasible for railroad companies to immediately switch from diesel engines to cleaner equipment.
"There is kind of flow of time that it takes," said Robert Fletcher, chief of the Air Resources Board's Stationary Sources Division. "It's not like we're standing still and nothing's happening."
Since 2005, BNSF has replaced 30 vehicles used to haul cargo around the yard with cleaner models, Stehly said. The company has also decided to bring in greener switching engines by 2015.
"You have our highest attention," Stehly said. "We are doing things here we don't do anywhere else."
Like the many residents who attended the meeting and voiced their concerns about cancer -- some said family members died of the disease -- Mayor Pat Morris and First Ward Councilwoman Esther Estrada called for quick action to reduce pollution.
"We all have relatives and friends who have died of cancer," Estrada said Wednesday.
Estrada said people living near the railyard to organize and press for improvements. She also said it more be necessary for BNSF to relocate its San Bernardino operations.




What a wonderful idea Esther! Have BNSF move more of their operations....and where to? Just like when they wanted to connect to the airport but Valles didn't want to disturb all the beautiful, historic homes on 5th so we lost that and the jobs that went with it? YEP.....the jobs keep leaving, the homeless shelters and parolee homes keep moving in, and the decent families that can afford to keep moving out.
I can't wait to see if she runs for her seat again.....
BNSF is the largest private employer in San Bernardino.
Esther believes: She also said it more be necessary for BNSF to relocate its San Bernardino operations.
Relocate out of San Bernardino? Kaiser Steel has left, Norton AFB is gone, BNSF already moved some stuff to Kansas, stores closing everywhere - and one of our councilpeople thinks it may be necessary for them to relocate their San Bernardino operations? She is the councilperson for this area....does this area have so many job opportunities that it (and the whole city) can afford to blow off jobs?
What is this woman thinking? Did all of these people move in prior to the railroad operation being placed there? I don't think so.....if they have a problem with this that can't wait for a reasonable amound of time (so BNSF can fix things) then maybe they should
relocate" to another area - within San Bernardino or not. It's not like they can't find another house here - God know that there are PLENTY of open houses to look at. Maybe the city should help with a house swap instead of escorting THE LARGEST PRIVATE EMPLOYER IN SAN BERNARDINO OUT OF SAN BERNARDINO.
Instead of keeping Glenn Baudes' mouth shut someone should tell Esther to keep her mouth shut!
I think the mayor is throwing Esther a bone to stop talking about subpenas.
I'm old enough to remember when Kaiser Steel and Norton AFB were going concerns...and the third-stage smog alerts which went with them, too.
I for one don't feel that we need settle for jobs digging our and our children's graves!
Good news is that SoCal can actually lead rather than lag in "green job creation" in this area: simply by requiring the railways to electrify their lines (which would also help reduce train collisions), then work with them to ensure that this happens.
Do you really think that the railways will risk their access to the SoCal markets, as well as to our ports, by not working with us? Think about it...