Council candidate forum notes: The 4th Ward contest
The 4th Ward race features incumbent Fred Shorett and Joe Arnett.
The race is something of a sequel to the March special election. Shorett defeated Arnett and two others in that contest to fill out the remainder of former Councilman Neil Derry's term. Derry is now a member of the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors.
Arnett got the race off to an early start in July when Arnett formally announced that he would challenge Shorett. One of the key themes that Arnett introduced into the campaign at that time - Fire Department staffing - was repeated during Tuesday's debate.
Arnett and Shorett are both presenting themselves to voters as fiscally-saavy, pro-business candidates who will support public safety efforts, and the Fire Department issue is one of the wider rifts between the two.
Tuesday, Arnett repeated his claim that Shorett reneged on a promise to support public safety when he voted earlier this year to accept budget cuts to the Fire Department. The cuts did not result in any firefighter layoffs, but eliminated positions that had been filled with firefighters working overtime.
The end result was that some engine companies that had been staffed with four crew members ended up having three firefighters attached. The difference means that three-person crews have to wait for backup before entering a burning building unless its obvious that someone needs to be rescued.
Arnett further criticized Shorett for supporting the creation of a city spokesperson's position. The position is not set up to be financed through the general fund, but the move to create a highly-paid communications job while cutting back on payroll was and remains controversial.
"Putting PR ahead of public safety just is not business saavy," Arnett said Tuesday.
Shorett responded, as he has before, that the city's budget situation left no other options regarding Fire Department staffing.
"I voted fiscally responsible to support a level of public safety that can get the job done," Shorett said, adding that the PR job is a way to solve San Bernardino's image problem, an issue that all candidates said needs to be addressed.
Fire Chief Mike Conrad has said that firefighters can protect residents with three-person crews, but he has never objected to four-person crews if the money can be found.
The decision to cut the firefighting budget was made before Shorett joined the council. Shorett acted to affirm the cuts after Councilman Chas Kelley, who initially voted for the cuts, decided the cuts were a mistake and sought to reverse course.
Kelley has made three efforts to fund four-person engine companies. The first two were denied through procedural tactics and the third was rejected via and up-and-down vote.
Also on Tuesday, Shorett made repeated assertions that the currently-divided City Council, which often votes in 4 to 3 blocs on major issues, is an obstacle to new development in the city.
"Capital follows certainty," he said.
Arnett also restated his view that San Bernardino has potential to market itself as place for green technology start-ups can find a home. He sees a lot of potential, for example, in the idea of using algae to produce fuel.




Is it just me or is it that Arnett puts a plug in for the Fire Union every chance he gets? Gee, that campaign support must really result in quid pro quo...doesn't Arnett realize that this troubled City has much bigger problems than cutting vacant Fire positions? What about restoring Police? Joe, you are starting to sound like a one-trick pony.
Press Enterprise Endorsement: Shorett for San Bernardino
“In the 4th Ward, Fred Shorett also backs tough code enforcement, and brings a pro-business approach to a bureaucracy-heavy city government.
He has only been in office since April, after winning a special election in March. And Shorett has done nothing in office that warrants voters turning him out a scant few months after electing him.” PE
The PE is wrong in it's endorsements 50% of the time. And since it is NOT the Riverside's paper employees who vote in SB, then the voters will continue to vote for who they consider worthy of their vote. The media is very good at swaying unsuspecting voters which means democracy gets derailed.
Your embarrassing, And just wait until all registered voters get this and other endorsements in their mail boxes. This is the beginning of the end for Penman, Jason, and Joe.
Remind me again which San Bernardino candidates the Press Enterprise endorsed in 2007. Let's see they backed the LOSERS in the 5th and 7th Ward and the City Attorney's election. In fact their endorsed candidate in the 5th Ward received less than a quarter of the vote. Good campaigns, not newspaper endorsements, win elections. If "Uell be kuhl" thinks the PE endorsement will hurt Arnett, Desjardins or Penman, then he should change his blog name to "Iell be stupid"!
That is just the point: In 2007 all the incumbents got elected. That is just the way it will be in 2009. Sorry Chris, you cant win them all.
Let's see here...Chris Jones....Bill Postmus, Jim Erwin, Paul Biane, Colonies Developer Jeff Burum...Joe Ar"nutt".....is there a method to this madness or does Mr. Jones simply have no morals....Sold to the highest bidder!
My husband was right, follow the money and the story will speak for itself.
Chris Jones knows how to beat incumbents. Just ask Joe Suarez, Jon Mikels and Dennis Hansberger!
Mr. Jones' motto...
'I'd rather be lucky than good'.
When you use mob tatics and money from special interest sometimes it is easy to fool the voters...not this time I am afraid....it is time to pay the piper!
Oh so immodest you are Mr. Jones: Any political hack, like you Chris, with a lot of money from the Union Goons, can get any empty-suited-monkey elected. You are just a small cog in the corrupt Postmus/Derry/Erwin/Burum political mafia wheel.