PROFILE


Shelly Leachman
For years Shelly Leachman's mom encouraged her to go into education; she chose to write about it instead. Since 2006 Shelly has been juggling coverage of 10 school districts and two colleges for the Daily Breeze, where she is the resident office apple addict. Contact her at: dailybreeze.com

Toni Sciacqua
Toni Sciacqua is the managing editor at the Daily Breeze, where she has worked since 1998. Among other things, she's in charge of nagging reporters to update their blogs, but she helps them out by posting random tidbits from outside sources. She has two small children who will one day attend North Torrance schools.


Daily Breeze online
Subscribe to RSS feed

ADVERTISEMENT


Powered by
Movable Type 4.1

« LA Buses Get Help Going Green | Main | Chaka Khan let me rock you, let me rock you Chaka Khan! »

Location, Location, Location

Let me start this entry by saying I find it highly depressing that the following study even exists and hopefully it's more a case of "you can reach whatever conclusion you want if you conduct the study just so" than it is accurate, but hey, what do I know?

Here's the dillyo:

The Every Child Matters Education Fund, a non-partisan nonprofit, today released a report that says the state a child lives in can adversely affect his or her life, so much so that kids in the state's that rank lowest according to "a wide variety of child well-being indicators" are...

* Twice as likely to die in their first year as children in the highest ranking state.
* Three times more likely to die between the ages of one-14.
* Roughly three times more likely to die between the ages of 15-19.
* Three times more likely to be born to a teenage mother.
* Five times more likely to have mothers who received late or no prenatal care.
* Three times more likely to live in poverty.
* Five times more likely to be uninsured.
* Eight times more likely to be incarcerated.
* 13 times more likely to die from abuse and neglect.

Tito, bring me a tissue. That is awful!

Among the factors used to arrive at this determination, and to rank the states accordingly, were poverty, race, educational achievement, political culture, taxes and weak federal policy on things such as health insurance, child abuse and poverty.

From the press release:
"Based on a wide cross-section of 10 major child well-being standards, the 10 bottom states identified in the Every Child Matters Education Fund report are:  Arizona (41); South Dakota (42); Nevada (43); Arkansas (44); South Carolina (45); Texas (46); Oklahoma (47); New Mexico (48); Mississippi (49); and Louisiana (50). 

The 10 top states for children by the same measures are:  Maine (10); Washington (9); Minnesota (8); Iowa (7); Hawaii (6); New Hampshire (5); Rhode Island (4); Connecticut (3); Massachusetts (2); Vermont (1)."

I guess our fair Golden State falls somewhere in the middle. Do you think we're nearer the Top 10 or the bottom? And why is New England so dominant?

To learn more about the report and the Every Child Matters organization, which is calling these "life and death" differences the "forgotten campaign issue" of 2008, visit this website.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

E-mail to a friend

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):