Hi all, As you know, we've been through emotional times in the newsroom with the tragic loss of education reporter Vu Nguyen. He is missed.
In his absence, education reporting at the Breeze has been a bit up in the air, and this blog has gotten lost in the confusion. I'm hoping to begin its return with this post.
Here's the deal: Newsweek released its list of the top high schools in the country this week, and South Bay campuses showed some surprising rankings. Here's the complete list of the magazine's top 1,500 public schools.
Here are the South Bay schools on the list, with associated rank:
56. Hawthorne Math & Science Academy (charter)
144. Palos Verdes Peninsula High
185. Palos Verdes High
299. Mira Costa High
351. California Academy of Math & Science (charter)
445. Animo Venice (charter)
582. Animo Leadership (charter)
667. Harbor Teacher Preparation Academy
738. Redondo Union High
977. Animo Inglewood (charter)
1062. Carson High
1326. El Segundo High
1375. Narbonne High
1463. Westchester High
Well, how did campuses such as Carson, Narbonne and Westchester high schools -- generally considered fairly low-achieving -- end up on this list?
Here's how the rankings are devised, according to the magazine's website:
Public schools are ranked according to a ratio devised by [Washington Post education columnist] Jay Mathews: the number of Advanced Placement, Intl. Baccalaureate and/or Cambridge tests taken by all students at a school in 2008 divided by the number of graduating seniors. All of the schools on the list have an index of at least 1.000; they are in the top 6 percent of public schools measured this way.
More information on the ranking methodology is here.
*I noticed this interesting passage in Mathews' explanation of his calculations:
You may not like my criteria, but I have not found anyone who understands how high schools work and does not think AP, IB or Cambridge test participation is important. I often ask people to tell me what quantitative measure of high schools they think is more important than this one. Such discussions can be interesting and productive.
I have been having such a debate with Andy Rotherham, codirector of the Education Sector think tank. He argues that some of the schools on the NEWSWEEK list have low average test scores and high dropout rates and do not belong on any best-high-schools list. My response is that these are all schools with lots of low-income students and great teachers who have found ways to get them involved in college-level courses. We have as yet no proven way for educators in low-income schools to improve significantly their average tests scores or graduation rates. Until we do, I don't see any point in making them play a game that, no matter how energetic or smart they are, they can't win.