Say goodbye to red light cameras California
This from Calwatch:
While the state collects millions of dollars from red-light cameras at intersections, a few California cities are starting to question whether the safety benefits are worth the high cost to their own coffers.
Other cities have rejected automatic ticketing programs as well, including Union City near San Jose, Yucaipa and Costa Mesa, Cupertino, Compton, El Monte, Fairfield, Fresno, Fullerton, Indian Wells, Irvine, Maywood, Montclair, Moreno Valley, Paramount, Rancho Cucamonga, Redlands, Roseville, San Carlos, Santa Fe Springs, Santa Maria, Santa Rosa and Upland.
Sadly neither Pasadena nor Baldwin Park make the list of California cities reconsidering the cost effectiveness of red light cameras.
4 Comments
Leave a comment
CONTRIBUTORS
|
| Frank Girardot, Metro Editor for the San Gabriel Valley Newspapers, brings you behind the yellow tape with takes on true crime, cold cases and more. This is also your forum to discuss crime, its impact on your neighborhood and how we cover it. Have any questions or tips? You can leave a comment here or e-mail Frank. |
|
|
Brian Day is the crime reporter for the San Gabriel Valley Newspaper group. E-mail Brian. |
This is a test
test
So why is this scurrilous, money-grabbing, pocket-picking intrusion not a violation of the equal protection clause of the Constitution? True, the 14th Amendment started out as a guarantee against unequal justice being meted out by "State" governments but has since been expanded to include the Federal government.
Why, then should local governments get a free pass and be allowed to rob it's citizenry under the most transparent rationalization(s) imaginable.
I can't think of anything that cries out more for "protection" than from the tax happy bureaucrats that steal from us under the ridiculous and patently untrue cloak of "public safety."
What the heck is a "Bolen Parque"?