Monrovia Police want more money
First it was Baldwin Park. Then it was Arcadia. Now, it's Monrovia - the latest casuality in bitter contract negotiations between sworn police officers and city officials.
It's pretty much the same story, Star-News reporter Melissa Pamer reports:
The Monrovia Police Officers Association and city officials have been meeting since spring, trying to negotiate a replacement contract for the four-year agreement that expired June 30, 2007. They've been far apart the whole time, representatives of both sides said.
The situation became pivotal on Friday, when the police association's lawyer informed City Manager Scott Ochoa that the city's fourth offer - of a 16.5percent raise over three and a half years - was rejected.
Now, police have taken to the streets to bring their fight to the people.
Over the weekend, off-duty officers talked to Monrovians and handed out fliers at local grocery stores. On Friday, automatic phone calls went out to 11,000 households warning of a "crisis" and saying city officials have "ignored" the association's request for "the resources to make our city more secure."
Here's the interesting part. It seems police are employing the recent string of gang shootings in their fight.
The attention comes as the spotlight on the city's public-safety efforts was beginning to fade, after six weeks of calm followed a series of gang shootings in December and January.
References to "dangerous gangs" and "senseless violence" have been employed in the association's calls for residents to lobby City Hall in support of increased public-safety funding.
What do you think? In poor taste or a good argument?

Comments
The MPOA could very well have taken advantage of tragedy a couple of months ago. They chose to wait till this time when all has stalled. There is no threat on their part. It is a fact that they are down bodies and the plethora of mutual aid will not last forever. What time is right for a contract dispute?
Posted by: Tom | March 11, 2008 8:16 PM
This is a typical job action by a public safety union; they turn down a SIXTEEN percent raise--not quite good enough, I guess--and then start accusing council members of being soft on crime. I'm sure the day will come when the 3% at 50 pension isn't good enough for them, either.
Thankfully, there are some brave souls sitting on city councils and county boards who are starting to say publicly that local government can't afford these huge public safety benefits.
In this case, I hope the Monrovia Council stands firm.
Posted by: Dog Spot | March 11, 2008 10:41 PM
Nice discussion of this issue going on on the Foothill Cities Blog, www.thefcblog
Posted by: Anonymous | March 14, 2008 11:22 AM