<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Leftovers from City Hall</title>
      <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/</link>
      <description>Forget reality TV. The real entertainment comes from inside San Gabriel Valley council chambers. City Hall reporters tear pages out of their notepads for a look at what doesn&apos;t always make it in the paper.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:14:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.1</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>West Covina&apos;s public safety costs &apos;unsustainable&apos;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sgvtribune.com/ci_9277373?source=rss_viewed">Dan Abendschein reports</a> that West Covina plans to make $5 million in cuts to narrow its projected&nbsp;deficit to $3 million.*</p>
<p>What Abendschein also tells us is that West Covina spends 77 percent of its budget on public safety. Yikes. Vallejo, the northern California that is declaring bankruptcy, spent up to 75 percent of its budget on public safety. </p>
<blockquote>
<p>"You could eliminate all non-public safety city hall personnel, and still not close the deficit," West Covina Finance Director Tom Bachman said. </p>
<p>*****</p></blockquote>
<blockquote>"Over 10 years our spending on public safety has jumped 99 percent, while non-public safety has only increased 41 percent," Bachman said. "It is hard to see a budget solution that does not involve public safety."</blockquote>
<p>I doubt the city will talk about bankruptcy any time soon. After all, another big reason Vallejo is broke is because of mismanagement. For example, Vallejo's city manager was raking in $317,000. West Covina City Manager Andrew Pasmant is making about $215,000.</p>
<p>*This was updated after&nbsp;a reader pointed out an earlier typo. Thanks to the commenter that stood up for me, but it was my bad. :/</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/west_covinas_public_safety_cos.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/west_covinas_public_safety_cos.html</guid>
         <category>West Covina</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:14:07 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Day laborers in Azusa</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>During my early morning 7.5 mile run today through Irwindale and Azusa, I noticed a Day Laborer sign where nearly a dozen men were lined up. My running partner told me that he has seen that line get as big as nearly 40 people. </p>

<p>What I found interesting is that the city condoned it. Why else would they have a sign and provide what looked like bus stops for these workers? It is a very different attitude than we hear from residents that complain about day laborers at places such as Home Depot.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/day_laborers_in_irwindale.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/day_laborers_in_irwindale.html</guid>
         <category>Industry</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:04:14 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>What do YOU think?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A couple of week's ago I blogged about La Puente officials' consideration of re-opening City Hall every Friday.</p>
<p>Looks like they want to know what the community thinks about that.</p>
<p>Go ahead, take <a href="http://www.lapuente.org/LP_Files/PublicNotices/survey.pdf">this survey.</a> You know you want to.<br /></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/what_do_you_think.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/what_do_you_think.html</guid>
         <category>La Puente</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:32:48 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The state lotto is the answer</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The hot story out of Sacramento today: Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger wants to borrow money against future lotto sales to eliminate the deficit.</p>
<p>Here are some excerpts from the AP story by Juliet Williams that ran in our paper today:</p>
<p><em>The $144.3 billion budget plan for the fiscal year that begins in July is a byproduct of a slowing state economy. Tax revenue has been falling far short of what California needs to keep pace with spending, leading to a $15.2 billion shortfall. </p>
<p>"Our crisis is real, and it is very serious," Schwarzenegger said during a news conference at the Capitol. </p>
<p>The centerpiece of Schwarzenegger's budget relies on a plan to make the state lottery more lucrative and thus more attractive to potential investors. </p>
<p>The Republican governor hopes to raise $15 billion over the next three years by selling bonds based on anticipated lottery revenue. He will use about $5.1 billion of that in the 2008-09 fiscal year to help erase the state's deficit. </p>
<p>The other $10 billion would remain in a reserve fund the governor wants to create to help the state get through rough financial times in the future. </em></p>
<p>Williams reports the proposal still requires voter approval come November.</p>
<p>If not....</p>
<p><em>...the governor would ask the Legislature to approve a temporary 1 cent increase in the state sales tax to pay for the reserve fund. It would last no more than three years. </em><br /><br />Ugh, death amd taxes...you know the saying.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/the_state_lotto_is_the_answer.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/the_state_lotto_is_the_answer.html</guid>
         <category>Your money</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 10:16:09 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>More deficits, only this time in Whitter</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.whittierdailynews.com/ci_9263551">Mike Sprague reports </a> that Whittier is facing a $1.8 million deficit.</p>

<p><em><blockquote>WHITTIER - The days of easily balancing the city's budget are over, thanks to rising sales and property taxes. </p>

<p>Instead, City Manager Steve Helvey will go to the City Council during an 8 a.m. Saturday study session looking for ways to balance the fiscal 2008-09 budget. </p>

<p>While the overall budget of $99.7 million is balanced, the key general fund isn't. It has a projected deficit of about $1.8 million. </p>

<p>"On Saturday, we'll give a list of ways we can balance the budget," Assistant City Manager Nancy Mendez said. "There's eight to 10 different ways to balance the budget."</blockquote></em></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/more_deficits_only_this_time_i.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/more_deficits_only_this_time_i.html</guid>
         <category>Whittier</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 10:14:18 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Taboo visits Rosemead</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="DISPLAY: inline"><img class="mt-image-right" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 20px 20px" height="190" alt="taboo.jpg" src="http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/taboo.jpg" width="300" /></span>Taboo, a Rosemead High Graduate and member of the popular music group the Black Eyed Peas, swung buy his former school for a motivational speech&nbsp;yesterday in honor of&nbsp;"Astronaunt Day." He spoke alongside NASA astronaunt John Olivas.</p>
<p>I'm not exactly sure why Taboo spoke on Astronaunt Day, since he has nothing to do with NASA or astronauts, but the kids seemed to enjoy it, <a href="http://www.sgvtribune.com/ci_9263576">Claudia Palma reports. </a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/taboo_visits_rosemead.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/taboo_visits_rosemead.html</guid>
         <category>Rosemead</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 09:49:59 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Sports saves or sinks?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Reporter Dan Abendschein has an interesting story in today's paper about the benefits of sports industry to the local economy.</p>
<p>Depending on who you talk to, that industry can either boost local economy or simply do nothing at all.</p>
<p>Of course, the local tie is developer Ed Roski's bid to build an $800 million NFL stadium in Industry.</p>
<p>What side are you on?</p>
<p><em>Sports in the greater Los Angeles region is a $2.1 billion industry, according to a study released by sports promoters Wednesday. </p>
<p>That $2 billion industry employs about 3,385 people in full-time jobs, according to the study. That's less than the 4,500 employed by the county's mining industry, according to Jack Kyser, the chief economist of the Los Angeles Economic Development Commission. </p>
<p>"Those are very small employment numbers," said Kyser. </em></p>
<p><em>The study, conducted by UCLA graduate students, looks at professional sports, college sports, horse racing and other annual sporting events in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino counties. </p>
<p>"This is one of the strongest sports markets in the country, and the study shows what kind of an impact it has on the local economy," said David Simon, president of the L.A. Sports Council. </em></p>
<p>(...)<br /><br /><em>The impact of sports on a local economy is a subject that has long been under debate. Developers and sports team owners, eager to capitalize on public funds, have long touted the benefits of the sports economy. </p>
<p>Economists have been split on the issue: most agree that building a new stadium where one has already existed does not help the economy. </em></p>
<p><em>A 2004 study by economists Edward Coulson and Gerald Carlino suggested a new stadium brings benefits to a neighborhood, by raising local property values and bringing in customers to local restaurants and businesses. </p>
<p>The question for cities is whether it pays for the government to invest in sports. </em></p>
<p>Read the <a href="http://www.sgvtribune.com/ci_9263871">full story</a> here.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/sports_saves_or_sinks.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/sports_saves_or_sinks.html</guid>
         <category>Industry</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 09:43:14 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>How did that get in there?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A letter that snuck into a public stack of records containted information that Rosemead officials said shouldn't have been made public yet. The letter was written by a developer wanting to attract national retailers to the Levitx Furniture site on Glendon Way, off the 10 Freeway. In the letter, it names Best Buy as the interested party. </p>

<p>Yesterday, I got a call after my story was edited and out of my hands asking that we hold off running the store name because they are still negotiating with Best Buy. Normally, the city likes to hold off on announcing those sorts of things until the deal is finalized, officials said.</p>

<p>Well, we ran the <a href="http://www.sgvtribune.com/ci_9263879">story</a>. If the negotiating goes bad, don't blame me. I'm just the messenger.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/how_did_that_get_in_there.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/how_did_that_get_in_there.html</guid>
         <category>Rosemead</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 08:32:25 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>New Starbucks now open</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>You can't tell by driving by it, but the Starbucks located in the new shopping center across from Big League Dreams is now open. The barista said it opened on Friday, and if you could believe it, there was not one person in line, and not one person going through the drive through. There was just a lonely customer sitting in the store, drinking his coffee. I'm sure that will quickly change.</p>

<p>It doesn't look like the other stores and restaurants, such as Quiznos or El Pollo Loco, are open yet, but signs say that they are coming soon. I don't know what that means, exactly.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/new_starbucks_now_open.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/new_starbucks_now_open.html</guid>
         <category>West Covina</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 08:25:11 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>CSU fees are going up</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>CSU fee hikes approved, the Associated Press reports</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>CSU committee approves 10 percent tuition hike Associated Press Last Updated 11:02 am PDT Wednesday, May 14, 2008</strong> </p>
<p>LONG BEACH -- The cost of attending a California State University campus is likely to go up again in the fall.</p>
<p>A committee of the CSU Board of Trustees on Wednesday authorized raising yearly undergraduate tuition by $276, or 10 percent. The increase means that undergraduates will pay an average of $3,797 next year, twice as much as what a CSU school cost in fall 2000.</p>
<p>The 23-campus system is under orders from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to reduce campus spending to help make up a statewide budget deficit. Several trustees said they had to ask students and their families to shoulder some of the burden. </p>
<p>The proposal approved by the Board of Trustees' finance committee is scheduled to be considered by the 23-campus system's full board late Wednesday</p></blockquote>
<p></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/csu_fees_are_going_up.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/csu_fees_are_going_up.html</guid>
         <category>Your money</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:08:07 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Minute madness</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Last night's Rosemead City Council meeting was fast. But it was also extremely frustrating. Council members balked at one another over whether to change minutes from summary to action; debated on why hard copies of city documents are sometimes better than computerized documents; and accused one another of preventing Rosemead from being transparent.</p>

<p>Councilmembers Maggie Clark and Gary Taylor said last night that the decision to go from summary meetings, which has more detail than action minutes, is just another attempt by majority to keep residents in the dark.</p>

<p>Mayor John Tran and Councilwoman Polly Low, however, both said that was ludicrous, and that it was Clark and Taylor that have been trying to keep the actions in City Hall distant from the public.</p>

<p>What I wish I could have told them last night was this: No one cares about the minutes. And even if they did, they don't have access to them.</p>

<p>Case in point: Last night, traffic commissioner Brian Lewin, who attends nearly every meeting, spoke on an issue about the city wanting to raise the rates for those who use the community centers. Brian went up to the podium, and spoke for nearly five minutes about how this is fine, but we shouldn't raise the rates for Rosemead residents.</p>

<p>If Brian would have read the staff report, he would have seen that that is exactly what is being suggested, Gary Taylor pointed out to Lewin.</p>

<p>But Brian didn't read the report. Why? I'm going to speculate that he didn't read it for a few reasons. </p>

<p>No. 1: Residents only have two days before the meeting to review the staff reports, which sit on the counter Monday and Tuesday. And they have to make sure to go to City Hall or to the library to do so. </p>

<p>No. 2: Unlike at most other cities, which make their staff reports available to the public DURING the meeting, Rosemead keeps those documents locked up. </p>

<p>No. 3: The documents aren't available online. If they were, I am sure someone like Brian Lewin would read them.</p>

<p>So, who cares how detailed the minutes are if the public can't view them?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/minute_madness.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/minute_madness.html</guid>
         <category>Rosemead</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:57:05 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Baby steps in Rosemead</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Last night's meeting was recorded last night by video camera. That means that DVD's of the meeting will be available to the public at $5 a pop. And hopefully, this also means that the council will eventually be putting these meetings online.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/baby_steps_in_rosemead.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/baby_steps_in_rosemead.html</guid>
         <category>Rosemead</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:03:50 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Speaking of traffic....</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="DISPLAY: inline"><img class="mt-image-right" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 20px 20px; WIDTH: 194px; HEIGHT: 214px" height="600" alt="TrafficLight.jpg" src="http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/TrafficLight.jpg" width="387" /></span>Jennifer McLain reports today about a countywide traffic signal synchronization program that will involve six San Gabriel Valley cities...</p>
<p><em>The program aims to increase mobility through reduced travel times by coordinating signal lights in the major arterials that run through the county. </p>
<p>Over the past few months, nearly $10.8 million worth of grants has begun to be distributed among several local cities, including Azusa, Rosemead, Montebello, Norwalk, Santa Fe Springs and West Covina. </em></p>
<p><em>There are more projects are on the way that will use that money, said Bill Winter, Los Angeles County Department of Public Works assistant deputy director for traffic and lighting. </p>
<p>Last March, after several years of stalled funding, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority - which provides 80 percent of the money for the program - opened up funding to cities in the San Gabriel Valley</em></p>
<p><br /><br /><br /></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/speaking_of_traffic.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/speaking_of_traffic.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 09:50:04 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>&quot;Are they insane?&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>As expected, concerns about the amount of traffic a football stadium could bring to the area if built in Industry are coming to fruition. </p>
<p>Note this letter that ran in our Opinion section today:</p>
<p><em>A stadium at the Pomona (60) and Orange (57) freeways? Are they insane? </p>
<p>Walnut already is complaining about the Mt. SAC traffic. </p>
<p>Anytime after 4:30 p.m., it takes me 20 to 30 minutes to get from Valley Boulevard to the 60 Freeway; normally, it only takes me 6 minutes. </p>
<p>From Brea to the 60, anytime after 3p.m., it's a good 40 minutes and normally it's only 10 minutes. </p>
<p>Who will pay for the repairs of our roads? Of course, us! Not the rich one who is putting in this stadium! </p>
<p>Have you ever tried to get north or south on the 57 Freeway when the Angel Stadium or the Honda Center, where the Ducks play, are having an event? This is a very bad idea! </p>
<p>Jean Jernigan <br />Walnut </p>
<p></em>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/are_they_insane.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/are_they_insane.html</guid>
         <category>Industry</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 09:38:33 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>No to Charle&apos;s Co. for now</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>If you're expecting the La Puente City Council to discuss extending an exclusive negotiating agreement with the Charles Co. tonight, don't hold your breath.</p>
<p>Here are some excerpts from a story I wrote for tomorrow's paper:</p>
<p><em>A recent land deal, the economy and a proposed big-box retail project at a main thoroughfare have officials rethinking negotiations with a prominent developer.</p>
<p>In a special meeting Monday, the Community Development Commission voted 3-2 to solicit interest from developers who previously submitted proposals for the Hacienda Boulevard project, essentially stalling talks with the Charles Co. for the same development.</p>
<p>La Puente officials have been in negotiations with the Los Angeles-based company for about a year for what has been preliminarily projected as an 11.5-acre retail commercial center in the 1300 block of Hacienda Boulevard at Fairgrove Avenue.</em></p>
<p>Mayor Louie Lujan and Councilwoman Nadia Mendoza say they want to "take a step back" and weigh all options before moving forward with a developer for the project, pegged as a retail center.</p>
<p>Councilman Dan Holloway said he has concerns about lingering effects of the city's budget.</p>
<p>And council members John Solis and Lola Storing disagree with their colleagues all together, citing loss to the city and wasted time. </p>
<p>City staff members have 45 days to solicit interest from developers who formerly submitted plans to the city for the project.</p>
<p>Some of those previous developers include <a href="http://www.newmarkmerrill.com/">Newmark Merrill</a>, <a href="http://www.loweenterprises.com/">Lowe Enterprises</a> and Ed Roski's <a href="http://www.majesticrealty.com/">Majestic Realty.</a> </p>
<p>Maybe Roski will build his football stadium in La Puente instead?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/no_to_charles_co_for_now.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/sgvgov/2008/05/no_to_charles_co_for_now.html</guid>
         <category>La Puente</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:02:52 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
