Winograd: We can't afford to stay in Afghanistan

Previous Entry | Next Entry
| | Comments (0) |
Marcy Winograd, who is challenging Jane Harman for the Democratic nomination, just put out her own statement on Afghanistan:

We all want to feel safe and secure, and know that our taxpayer dollars are not being wasted on perpetual wars that create new enemies. For these reasons, we must work for an exit strategy from Afghanistan and bring our troops home...

Some say we cannot afford to leave Afghanistan. In fact, my opponent argues we must eradicate corruption there because -- "... the United States has invested too many troops and too much treasure to fail." I say -- We cannot afford to stay in Afghanistan because we will bankrupt our country.
War and occupation breed corruption, so a policy of escalation in Afghanistan is at cross-purposes. If we really want to eradicate corruption in Afghanistan, then we should invest in humanitarian aid, not weapons that will kill innocent people and create more hatred toward us. Let us build schools, hospitals and houses -- not as an occupying power -- but as a global partner interested in shared prosperity and global stability.


Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Gene Maddaus published on September 22, 2009 12:50 PM.

Harman: More troops in Afghanistan, with conditions was the previous entry in this blog.

Harman responds: Op/ed is about corruption, not troops is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.25