Girls Volleyball Rankings

Above: Bonita wins big game over Charter Oak on Tuesday.
Girls Volleyball Top 10
1. South Hills (14-8) Huskies are closing strong
2. Los Altos (19-8) Travels to Bonita Thursday
3. Walnut (17-6) Upset Bonita last week
4. Bonita (13-3) Goes for outright league title vs. L.A.
5. Gladstone (19-9) Rolling through Montview League
6. Diamond Bar (16-10) Lost in five to St. Lucy’s
7. Bishop Amat (13-7) Seeks second-place finish
8. San Dimas (14-6) Saints are back on track
9. St. Lucy’s (11-10) On playoff bubble
10. Glendora (10-8) Needs big week
Rankings are based on matches played through Oct. 29
Comments: This was the toughest week to rank our top 10. Walnut's upset of Bonita last week threw the rankings into a big scramble, but made it clear that the top four are separated by a slot you couldn't slide a credit card through. But someone has to be No. 1, and this week it is streaking South Hills, which have suddenly caught fire. As for the next three positons, I decided to fall back on my theory in rankings teams, which is that a season-long resume carries more weight than a one-game happening and that a loss to a lesser-ranked team trumps a win over a higher-ranked team. So with that in mind, Los Altos, Walnut and Bonita are No. 2, No. 3 and No.4, respectively. But they could very easily be 2a, 2b and 2c. ... Gladstone, which is No. 5 this week, continutes to take care of business in the Montview League, although the Gladiators dropped their first game of the league season after being pushed to four games last week in a victory over Sierra Vista. Gladstone, which is 11-0 in league play, has won 33 of 34 games in the Montview League.

http://www.cifss.org/download_playoff_bracketts.php?sport_id=16
On Sunday afternoon (around noon), CIF playoff brackets will be released. Click on this link above to access all the playoff pairings. Steve Ramirez will have a story in Monday's newspaper with all the local matchups.

Comments
Cursty Jackson Got cheated out of first team all league her stats are amazing but her coach never reported it!!!!She got full ride to UNLV she had 23 kills and 5 aces against south hills 21 kills and 5 aces against Ontario 14 kills and 7 blocks against North View 12 kills against Diamond bar and sooo many more but i cant find them because her stupid coach never reported any of her STATS!
Posted by: Denise Thomas | December 29, 2007 10:23 AM
Just a couple of comments regarding the St. Lucy's season. The end of the season came quickly at Corona Del Mar, CDM exposing the vast gap between the two teams. First the coaching was clearly in CDM's favor. The coach for St. Lucy's was way in over her head. Secondly #15 on St. Lucy's was in reality calling the shots as far as substitions and strategy was concerned. Impact VBC will be interested to know their not only getting a outside hitter but a CIF qualified Coach as well, good luck on that one Impact. Many of the players at St. Lucy's I'm sure will not be sorry to see this season of mishaps & disappointments end. The only hope is that the powers that be at St.Lucy's will make the right choice in a Coach for next season & never again allow a player/coach to decide who should or shouldn't play.
Posted by: anonymous | November 12, 2007 6:37 AM
Just a couple of comments regarding the St. Lucy's season. The end of the season came quickly at Corona Del Mar, CDM exposing the vast gap between the two teams. First the coaching was clearly in CDM's favor. The coach for St. Lucy's was way in over her head. Secondly #15 on St. Lucy's was in reality calling the shots as far as substitions and strategy was concerned. Impact VBC will be interested to know their not only getting a outside hitter but a CIF qualified Coach as well, good luck on that one Impact. Many of the players at St. Lucy's I'm sure will not be sorry to see this season of mishaps & disappointments end. The only hope is that the powers that be at St.Lucy's will make the right choice in a Coach for next season & never again allow a player/coach to decide who should or shouldn't play.
Posted by: anonymous | November 12, 2007 6:36 AM
and a nice person
Annie Kim
love her
Posted by: Anonymous | November 6, 2007 4:40 AM
Fyi to all new bloggers-this is now last weeks blog. Go to main on the top of the page and then scroll down to find the new volleyball blog for this week
Posted by: Anonymous | November 6, 2007 4:40 AM
All I have to say is that Ganesha does have a chance of beating Gabrielino, they did once in summer league [i think O__O] and Annie Kim is a great player no question about it, but she can't win the game all by her self it is a team sport you know if Ganesha shuts down the rest of their hitters they might win....... but only time will tell what will happen [i'm going to get annie's autograph when i see her she's freaking AWSOME ^.^]
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 10:45 PM
There are no facts on a blog-just opinions from little kids who have never seen other schools play.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 1:07 PM
the setter for south hills has issues with setting 31's, when the pass is off target. Which is why I said serve them deep. South hills has a tendency to shank or pass balls way off the net if they are served deep in the corners.
If lai is playing out side then the have the lefty playing middle. BE READY - everything is hit crossed body so the the outside hitter and left back have to be ready. - have you libro move towards that side as well.
Mussleman hits everything long so stay back and play desciplined. Lai will tip after getting blocked, and is pretty good at it too.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 1:04 PM
Like the thinking behind beating SHHS too. Pretty right on.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 12:49 PM
Stating facts is not negative smiley giggles.
I like the strategy for defeating South Hills. However, easier said then done. It should be a great matchup.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 12:36 PM
If you haven't noticed volleyball is our life-losers who like Hello Kitty can get on MySpace!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 12:33 PM
So is Annie Kim from Gabrielino signed or not? Can someone confirm? How is Ganesha going to contain Annie Kim?
Posted by: vbnut from walnut | November 5, 2007 12:14 PM
So is Annie Kim from Gabrielino signed or not? Can someone confirm? How is Ganesha going to contain Annie Kim?
Posted by: vbnut from walnut | November 5, 2007 12:13 PM
They are not over rated. They are a solid team. But can be broken down, because they are missing another go to girl (if not a few more).
Melinda is only a sophmore - she will be awsome for the next few years. But if she doesnt find help, then good luck.... In her league she cant do it alone like wilson did last year.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 12:10 PM
South Hills is overrated...just stop the front slide from the middle and take advantage of the weak outside hitter block.
Posted by: vbnut from walnut | November 5, 2007 12:05 PM
lets just say that most coaches and players at top gun are not to happy with the politics/pay/etc. Thats why many coaches have left the program.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 12:05 PM
smiley googles - you will see on tuesday when you play girls who play year round ball like Annie and the few other who also played club....
And if you get passed them, good look play the fast offense of Los Altos, not to mention their tall middles.
Unfortunatley this is not bad talk against you or your team, true facts.
Much like if you you would be talking about the raiders vs. the colts or patriots. YOU HAVE TO BE REALISTIC.
reality: Ganesha is the underdog - by a lot!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 12:03 PM
FEEL TO IT
Posted by: SOAP | November 5, 2007 12:00 PM
Wow, how do you know Gab's best player is not going back to Top Gun? So, she didnt sign with Cal Poly Pomona already then why even go there the first place?
That comment about Top Gun is kinda suspicious! It sounded like someone is talking trash about another club. We dont need that here plus no facts were given.
If she really is not getting any offer, then tell her to go to Impacts VBC and plays with the best players from SGV and OC.
And, why are most players not going back to Top Gun?
Why shop around when you can go to Impacts. Look at Diamond Bar's MVP and St. Lucy's MVP, they are there already.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 11:58 AM
ALL U COACHES/FAMILY/PLAYERS/PPL DO NOT HAVE A LIFE...SO GET THE CLUE AND GET A MYSPACE.....AND HAVEN'T U NOTICED THAT WHEN A PLAYER POSTS A COMMENT ITS POSITIVE N WHEN A COACH POSTS A COMMENT IT HAS A NEGATIVE
Posted by: SOAP | November 5, 2007 11:57 AM
Diamond Bar Can Easily Upset South Hills.
Serve at Mussleman and Gomez. Serve the corners
Take advantage of Lai, when the coach plays her in the middle set the middle time and again.
Plays serious defense.
1) watch the setter dumps/
2) Block Gomez a few times (it makes a difference), be ready for the 31's!!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 11:56 AM
it's positive??? how about that comment about the valle vista league not beating anybody but themselves???
Posted by: smily_goggles | November 5, 2007 11:53 AM
Diamond Bar is going to upset South Hills. Torrie Brown for MVP. She plays for Impacts VBC.
Posted by: DBfan | November 5, 2007 11:30 AM
Annie Kim played for TOP GUN, but much like all other TOP GUN players, she is looking elsewhere for this club season.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 11:23 AM
Since Torrie Brown of Diamond Bar is going to Cal State Fullerton, what club is she playing for?
And Annie Kim of Gabrielino High is going to where? And what club is she playing for?
How come we dont hear much about volleyball players getting signed then football players?
There should be more balance of coverage between both Fall sports!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 11:20 AM
Wow giggles that was an interesting post. I would have to agree this blog is pretty positive except for the occasional St. Lucy's hate/love. Nobody has bad mouthed any players. Also nobody ever doubted Ganesha. For the most part there has been a lot of praise for Ganesha. There tour through CIF may be a short one because Gabrielino is very tough but good luck to you. As for your post, Im not sure how many coaches post on here, but there are some parents and other volleyball followers.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 11:10 AM
To Smily Goggles (nice name by the way). This blog really means nothing so don't take it to heart so much. I haven't noticed any coaches saying there players are good because of them ALL YEAR on the blog, so where are you coming from? I agree that we don't need to talk about who has the best player, but if we get people to blog more it's all good for the most part. This blog is way more fun than the Pasadena blog, which basically has zero contributors. Oh-Ganesha isn't needy, many of us just found out this blog exists so we are a little excited.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 10:52 AM
Ganesha sounding like a very needy team right now. You're in! You're good! Go for it! Feel better?
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 10:35 AM
am i missing something here?? where's the hate? for the most part, this is a very positive blog! read what the knuckleheads on the football blog have to say and how they say it. Major props to all of these teams and coaches going on to CIF. there are some great match ups early on and the possibility of some even better ones!!!! Play on!
Posted by: ilikeanonymoustoo | November 5, 2007 10:32 AM
COACHES PLEASE READ:
I have followed this blog since the beginning. When everyone doubted Ganesha would place in CIF. When every coach talked about their team and how great they were. When people would put down other teams and tell them how much better another team was. The long discussions about who was the best player and who hit the ball harder. I only have a few words for these coaches who brag and brag about how great their team is. Have you noticed that from failure comes great success? To be strong first you must be weak and build up. It is funny how coaches brag about how their players are so good and they take great pride in them, thinking that the coach had some type of great effect on them. Yes, many players have improved and have been influenced by coaches, but is it not the players putting their effort and sweat out in the court. You may teach them how to dig balls coming to them at a great speed, you may teach them how to block and hit, but it is only the player who decides how great they want to be, it is only the player who decides to sacrifice her body out in the court. It is the player that decides to wake up early and work hard and push themselves to be the best. IT IS ONLY THE PLAYERS who decides how great they want to be, it is their effort and their time that they put in the love of volleyball. I am disgusted at the fact that you made a hobby of young girls into a thing of hatred and awful rivalry. So next time you decide to talk about how great one girl is better than another, think about this first.
Posted by: Smily_Goggles | November 5, 2007 10:21 AM
you guys are all haters!
soplan
ganesha all the way yeeea!
Posted by: anonymous | November 5, 2007 10:08 AM
I was not expecting SL to get a bye first round either. I would agree that SHHS should have picked that one up, but whatever. Good luck to the Regents!!! No less than the semis!!!
The early signing period starts this month. Girls may have given a verbal committment to a college but cannot officially sign until next week. The spring signing period is next April. Lots happens between November and April-like 4 months of club. Take your time, girls. Make the right choice. Eaglespride-the schools you mentioned always send girls away on vb scholarships. This year will be no different. Just because you haven't heard doesn't mean they "don't got anyone signed."
Posted by: ilikeanonymoustoo | November 5, 2007 9:40 AM
Walnut BEAT St. Lucy's
Los Altos BEAT St. Lucy's
South Hills BEAT Walnut
South Hills BEAT Los Altos
I dont thiink 12-11 or whatever their record was, deserves a bye.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 9:22 AM
St Lucy's BEAT South Hills preseason 3-1
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 8:22 AM
The St. Lucy's bye is a fluke, it should have gone to South Hills. St. Lucy's lost to many area teams including Walnut & Los Altos. Thats why they were ranked lower locally.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 7:52 AM
Torrie Brown Cal State Fullerton scholarship
where is Annie Kim going
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 5:30 AM
Annie Kim is the real deal! The rest of Gabrielino's squad is also strong, but Ganesha is no slouch. We are ready for a volleyball G-High love fest of high quality play! May the best team win and go far in CIF! We only wish our sisters from Holy Family could be there, but they are also in CIF!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 4:49 AM
This blog ranking is so far off. The only school from this paper ranking that got a bye for playoff is St. Lucy. I always wonder how much does our reporter know about volleyball. I just wish they can interview the officals from cif from time to time so the newspaper rankings are at least similar to the cif rankings
Posted by: Anonymous | November 5, 2007 4:27 AM
Anyone else in the san gabriel valley area got offer a full ride scholarship from any colleges beside Annie Kim from Gabrielino High this year so far??
Watchout Ganesha! Gabrielino got a blue chip player. Come see our prime time player on tuesday.
And where are the St Lucy, Bonita, Ayala, South Hills, Diamond Bar seniors going? how come they dont got any one signed yet?
Posted by: eaglespride | November 5, 2007 4:14 AM
LETS go pAmona <----- XD inside joke. GO G-HIGH
Posted by: Anonymous | November 4, 2007 10:42 PM
WOW! u guys sould come and watch G-high play on Tuesday it will be a friendly battle to the end..... MUHAHAHAHAHA
Posted by: CheeZCakE | November 4, 2007 10:39 PM
If by help you, you mean tell you some of the matchups. Sure. Which ones?
Posted by: Anonymous | November 4, 2007 5:01 PM
Can somebody help me? I tried to open up the pairing s from the Cifss site, but for some reason the Adobe 8.1 version cant open it. It tells me cannot open because file is damaged or corrupt or file was sent as email attachment.
Posted by: patrick | November 4, 2007 4:14 PM
FYI: the LA jv coach, coaches for Starlings San gabriel, 14 team 3. YES the worst of the worst!!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 4, 2007 2:40 PM
Some interesting matchups in CIF. Two locals play, Diamond Bar at South Hills. St. Lucy's somehow gets a bye even though they finished 2nd in league. Ganesha at Gabrielino. Good luck G-hi. LA and Bonita look like they have easy draws for a couple of rounds. That division III-A is weak. Good luck to all the the teams in the SGV.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 4, 2007 2:39 PM
Los Altos volleyball will always kick butt!!!
For years to come with the Starting Middle FRESHMAN, and the Right-side starter SOPHOMORE!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 4, 2007 12:23 PM
Not saying that any of our girls from LA didn't play for Heights. Responding to the fact that the blog said our coaches owned Heights which is incorrect. Also, stating that more than 3/4 of our VARSITY team didn't play for Heights or play Club at all. Learn how to read!
Posted by: high5 | November 4, 2007 8:40 AM
Just to respond to the Northview bloggers: The Ganesha bloggers are still blogging-why? Because we are still playing. Sorry-Northview had a good team and should have had an at large bid. They will also have a strong program next year, but Ganesha is in CIF with a 17-8 record. If we can get past a 1 seed in the first round anything is possible.
Posted by: Geez High | November 3, 2007 10:37 PM
Why don't we just try and enjoy the sport and not worry about who coaches a club sport. Oh, thank you club coaches for giving all of the time and expertise to our daughters!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 3, 2007 10:26 PM
we need to start clubbing those club coaches out of high school sports. There are no true high school teams these day
Posted by: Anonymous | November 3, 2007 9:43 PM
Why is Ganesha not in the area and Bonita is? No offense to Bonita, but Ganesha is over 100 yds. further west than Bonita and right of the 10 FWY. Tenemos muchas preguntas en Pomona esta noche!
Good luck to all area teams in the playoffs-Las Gigantes van a Jugar con Ganas!
The Giant Wall of Pomona is ready for CIF!
Posted by: GHigh Para Siempre | November 3, 2007 9:29 PM
Is this site going to blow up win CIF pairings come out manana! Vivan las gigantes!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 3, 2007 9:01 PM
Im assuming you are in the wrong blog. That is football right?
Posted by: Anonymous | November 3, 2007 2:22 PM
Interesting? Where did you get that information?
Posted by: Anonymous | November 3, 2007 2:20 PM
SORRY THAT DIDN'T POST WELL. HERE IT IS AGAIN:
AREA RANK, STATE RANK, TEAM, POWER RATING
#1 #88 Glendora 31.8
#2 #104 Diamond Ranch 30.3
#3 #145 Charter Oak 28.9
#4 #153 South Hills 24.5
#5 #158 Bishop Amat 24.2
Posted by: Anonymous | November 3, 2007 1:43 PM
AREAS TOP 5 BASED ON STATISTICAL POWER RATINGS INCLUDING STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE AND OPPONENTS W-L:
Freeman's
AREA RANK STATE RANK TEAM POWER RATING #1 #88 Glendora 31.8
#2 #104 Diamond Ranch 30.3
#3 #145 Charter Oak 28.9
#4 #153 South Hills 24.5
#5 #158 Bishop Amat 24.2
Posted by: TOP 5 STATISTICALLY | November 3, 2007 1:41 PM
So you are saying that there are no players who play at Los Altos and Hacienda Heights Volleyball Club?
Posted by: anon | November 3, 2007 7:57 AM
I never respond to these comments but it is really getting out of control. People are talking without getting facts straight. The owner of Hacienda VBC is Dave Cota. Coach DeLaVara hasn't coached club for the past 2 years, our JV Coach coaches for the Starlings in ELA (none of our players belonged to that club).
Posted by: high5 | November 3, 2007 7:47 AM
As far as investigating Los Altos and Heights VBC maybe you should get your facts straight. Esquivel and Mora (the 2 players that play all around) played for Quest VBC the past few years. Nigeria (our Middle)and DeLaVara (our setter) played for Top Gun. Alyssa *our setter) and Kristin (our opposite)played at other clubs. Our 3 libreros didn't play club at all. Los Altos was spread out in different clubs the past 2 years. Coach DeLaVara, Coach Eshom, Jaime and Thuy have worked so hard to bring all the athletes back to play together this season, as a team, and was very successful. Think about it, 6 different club philosophies and techniques brought together for Coach DeLaVara to put together as one. Wow!! We love our coaches and thanks for your hard work. LA MOM
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 11:37 PM
WOOT! WOOT! Ganesha is going to CIF!!! WoWzErZ Are you aLL Excited!!!! ^.^ i sure am!!!!!
Posted by: CheEzcAkE | November 2, 2007 11:34 PM
Ha Ha Melinda Gomez a junior?! she is just a sophomore!
Posted by: nacho | November 2, 2007 11:33 PM
actually the rule is once you have coached them for club, THEN they may not return as your high school player. And since Bonita's coach has never coached any of those players prior to high school season, and will only do so for their 18s club season they will not return for another high school season since they are graduating. So all is legal!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 10:13 PM
Can we focus on the positives of high school volleyball in the SGV? CIF is coming up. This nonsense can be hashed out in the offseason.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 10:03 PM
So should Charter Oak and Wilson request an investigation of Los Altos since there varsity and JV coach own Heights Volleyball Club, coach Los Altos girls and switch back and forth every year as to who is the club director? Seems pretty illegal to me, but what do i know.
Posted by: anon | November 2, 2007 8:49 PM
So Charter Oak and Wilson high school should request cif for an investigation about Bonita since Bonita coach is a Club West coach.
According to CIF rule: Members of the high school athletic staff may not, outside the season of sport:
1. Own or be a director
2. Serve on the Board of Directors
3. Serve in any administrative position or
4. Be an advisor on personnel decisions
with any organization/club in which student athletes of his/her high school
participate.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 7:28 PM
My daughter played with SCVA and the level of play was great as well as the experience, which you can't put a price on. The cost was VERY reasonable for the training, opportunity and everything that was included in general. I would due it every year if she made the team. The coaching was okay, but at that level, they don't need much coaching. They should already know pretty much what to do. That's why they're there.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 2:36 PM
If Bonita's coach is not her club coach for the upcoming club season, which I'm sure he is not, then he can coach another team for the same club. Bonita is not breaking the rules then. Sour grapes shouldn't change the fact that Bonita's program should be allowed to succeed and their coach is not breaking the rules. Please don't try and mess with people's lives and destroy one of the best programs in our area.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 2:27 PM
Here is the Rule on Outside Association from CIF Blue Book. If the Coach continues to participate with her club team they (coach and player) are in violation and one of them must detach from the other. Thus one of them won't be at Bonita next year. Contact the schools AD for further clarification.
<>2912. ASSOCIATION WITH HIGH SCHOOL PLAYERS
No member of the school athletic staff shall organize, sponsor, or coach a volleyball team outside the season of volleyball, during the school year, in which students with remaining eligibility at that school are participating. After the volleyball season and before May 12, coaches may associate with potential team members for the purpose of learning and practicing skills of volleyball only during one regular physical education class.
QUESTION: May a volleyball coach at any level be involved with the administration,
supervision and/or organization of a fall, winter, or spring volleyball program
where students from his or her school are participating?
ANSWER: No - The only contact a coach may have with the student athlete outside the
season of sport would be during a regularly scheduled physical education class
in which the student is enrolled.
QUESTION: How does the association rule apply to a member of a high school athletic staff’s
role with an organization (i.e. club, travel, fall/spring league, etc.)
outside the season of sport, during the school year where student athletes of
his/her high school participate.
ANSWER: Members of the high school athletic staff may not, outside the season of sport:
1. Own or be a director
2. Serve on the Board of Directors
3. Serve in any administrative position or
4. Be an advisor on personnel decisions
with any organization/club in which student athletes of his/her high school
participate.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 2:19 PM
Valle Vista League
1. San Dimas
2. Covina
3. Ganesha
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 12:52 PM
tossing out balls to scva hp hopefuls does not make you a great coach even if you have usa volleyball on your warm ups. this was ex st. lucy's coach claim to fame.
Posted by: anonymous | November 2, 2007 12:47 PM
What community do you live in and what are your W2's? Your daughter may be good enough to play.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 12:33 PM
Ouch. My daughter didn't make the team for SCVA in the 14's division. Should I submit my taxes with my application? I have deep pockets?
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 12:13 PM
there is another level above Scva high performance teams...it is usa high performance.
so, if your kid make it to Usa high performance,then you really dont need a checkbook.
the only coach that is involve in Usa high performance in this area is the assistant coach from cal poly pomona...he would be the best trainer in the area.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 12:10 PM
volleyball follower, thanks for a great post on your recap of the match. As someone who knows we can't have reporters all over the valley to cover everything that should be covered, it's nice to see someone read this blog, get excited about a match, go watch it, then come back here and write about what he saw. If someone did that at every match, be it a parent or a fan, we wouldn't miss a thing.
Posted by: FredJ | November 2, 2007 11:43 AM
"If you have a check book, you will make the 2007 SCVA Select Team."
Disgruntled?? Jealous??
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 11:32 AM
If I have to pay for my daughter to get exposure, I'll do whatever it takes. However, it's her talent that will take her the rest of the way. As parents, it's our responsibility.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 11:27 AM
There are hundreds and hundreds of girls who tryout for the SCVA Select Team and only 12 make it. That was a dumb comment that you have to have a checkbook????
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 11:24 AM
Obviously, you have to have a checkbook to play club or anything else, but you can't buy talent.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 11:20 AM
If you have a check book, you will make the 2007 SCVA Select Team.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 11:10 AM
So, Bonita was off last night. That doesn't mean they're a bad team. They are an excellent team. Everyone has a bad night and can't be perfect all the time. It sounds like it's the parents that are causing the girls lose their focus. As for the setter from Bonita that you're all speaking of....Remember that she made the 2007 SCVA Select Team for Southern California without any influence from her "personal trainer". Obviously others recognized her talent which you refuse to see. So, please remember that this is a child you're talking about. My daughter made the SCVA team with her and we're from Los Altos. Ashley, you're an awesome player and don't let anyone let you think otherwise.
Posted by: Macias Family | November 2, 2007 10:51 AM
So, Bonita was off last night. That doesn't mean they're a bad team. They are an excellent team. Everyone has a bad night and can't be perfect all the time. It sounds like it's the parents that are causing the girls lose their focus. As for the setter from Bonita that you're all speaking of....Remember that she made the 2007 SCVA Select Team for Southern California without any influence from her "personal trainer". Obviously others recognize her talent which you refuse to see. So, please remember that this is a child your talking about. My daughter made the SCVA team with her and we're from Los Altos. Ashley, you're an awesome player and don't let anyone let you think otherwise.
Posted by: Macias Family | November 2, 2007 10:49 AM
I went to watch the Bonita/Los Altos match with much excitment and an eye on the "transfer". It was very apperant that the setter (transfer) for Bonita was not very good and that the girl that transfered to Bonita to play for her long time personal trainer "three years of grooming for Bonita" had a bad night. He pulled her in the second game after several errors but started her in the third game and never took her out.
Question...
Is it a CIF violation if the coach at a school influences a player that he has personally trained and coached for three years (sense 6th grade) to transfer to his school and promises her a starting position if she transfers?
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 10:29 AM
Thanks for the recap on the Bonita-LA game. When I saw Bonita play earlier this year they had difficulty passing, it sounds like this was their downfall again. They have lots of talent on that team though and should win a few games in CIF. Maybe those two teams will meet again.
I heard Diamond Bar beat Glendora last night does that affect the Sierra league standings or is it a done deal? Whoever gets 4th in that league should get an at large bid.
Other league results?
Miramonte?
1. Bo/LA
3. CO?
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 10:18 AM
St. Lucy's won a close match last night against Chino Hills in 4 games. Each match was a nail bitter. Great showings by Freshman players Deanna Dalton and Megan Callen. The team is peaking just at the right time. Should be strong in playoffs. Nice job to Chino Hills for recognizing SL's seniors in their final league game as well as giving their own seniors a great send-off.
Sierra league should close as:
1st - Ayala
2nd - St. Lucy's
3rd - Glendora
Posted by: GMAN | November 2, 2007 10:03 AM
I read the blog and decided to go Bonita to see a great game. Los Altos was behind early than caught fire to dominated Bonita. Coach DeLaVara should be the Valley Coach of the Year. He moved his rotation around and caused Bonita headachs. He was able to neutralize a bigger and stronger team.
Jade Esquivel(266 kills on the year) had another great game, should be Valley Player of the Year. Sophmore Meagan Macias #6 (137 kills 49 blocks on the year) stepped up with her biggest game of the year, she made Bonita pay. Freshman middle, Jazmen Russell #15, she has 196 kills and 50 blocks on the year and had a solid game. Junior, Nigeria Owens #8 had a big game at the net with crutial blocks (110 on the year). Defensively Samantha Mora #10 had great game and she had a few kills also with a couple crutial aces ( 99 kills and 31 aces on the year). The Libro Kim Stupin #1 and DS Stephanie Olives #5 had their strong games on the back side, these girls move very well and also serve very well Stupin has 35 aces and Olivas has 37 aces on the year. LA as a whole is a very good serving team 198 aces on the year.
I am amazed that we don't hear more about their setters. Senior, Alyssa Carillo #20 (399 assists on the year) and Junior, Alora DeLaVara #3 (340 assists on the year) they have a combined 739 assists. They know how to move it around and make the hole team better. Heck that are pretty good servers also Carillo has 30 aces and DeLaVara has 17. They may not get the recognition that others do, they run a 6-2 offense and they rotate in and out.
They may not be as athletic as the Amat Setter but they make their team better, game in and out and do not have the attitude. I have seem about 5 Amat games this year and nothing changes.
I am glad that I decided to go to Bonita for this game, Los Altos seems to be getting back in their grove at the right time.
All the stats that I quoted are from Max Preps, I love it when the coaches do their work it makes the life of volleyball fans a whole lot easier.
Posted by: volleyball follower | November 2, 2007 9:56 AM
Parents: Instead of complaining as to why your kid isn't playing or getting recognition, you should tell your kids to try harder and earn their spot. Not all kids have the potential that others have and you may be placing unnecessary pressure on your kid. What are you teaching your child? Are you going to follow them through life and fight their battles? Stop the drama, YOU ARE affecting the team.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 9:39 AM
LA vs. Bonita
It was a very exciting game to watch. Both coaching came with game plans however L.A. game planned seemed to work better. LA's opposite attack came alive and it opened up the game for the other front row hitters. Bonita's passing was looking like LA's when the playes the first time. Bonitas setter where having trouble through out the night, but it was bad passing that was making them look bad. LA's serving was almost perfect, and LA was able to pick on the weak passers from the get go. Jade Esqueval and Megean Mecias had great games. The big middles had their share of points but they where huge when it came to BLOCKS. The liberos where able to pick up on Bonitas hitting strategy and from there everything fell into place.
Bonitas coach as well as his players seemed frustrated with the fact that they could get things going, Los Altos was always one step ahead of them.
It was worth the drive!!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 9:38 AM
gladstone 12-0 in league
they've also played out of the area teams according to max preps so that should say a bit more about them.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 8:21 AM
Can somebody post the final league standings for the ones you know. Let see who is going to CIF.
San Antonio League
1. South Hills
2. Walnut
3. Rowland
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 7:58 AM
Nothing illegal about coaching your future players. He can actually coach her again this year in club but next high school season he can not.
As for what is happening at Club West and their clinics. (all speculation) I believe that is what should be investigated. I hear the coach is holding clinics (tryouts) and his girls are attending. This should be looked into by CIF and the school.
Posted by: anonymous | November 2, 2007 7:29 AM
Forget about the transfer from another area the real issue here is the Club/High School Coach realationship to the player. If indeed the HS Coach is her club coach or in anyway affiliated with the her club team (Director, Trainer, etc) that's a No No...
One of them will have to leave the school. I've seen this happen in the past and after this year one of them will be gone, bank on it...
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 7:18 AM
Bonita is overrated as usual with whatever players they have.
LA-rules and they will go far in the playoffs with the way they are playing toward the end of their league play.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 12:44 AM
From what we have witnessed at Ganesha, Bonita is a class act. We also have many out of area students who also come to Ganesha because of academics. Academics and athletics are often associated and we hope our teams will thrive because of this combination. Ome people need to familiarize themselves with the rules and the true intent of the rules. The volleyball programs in our area are clean and legit. Good luck to all in CIF-Vivan las gigantes mas finas de todo el mundo!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 2, 2007 12:32 AM
Good job Ash
Posted by: Robert | November 1, 2007 10:46 PM
if your going to cry and complain about bonitas freshman setter you should at least have the balls to post your name. Maybe you have a daughter sitting on the bench or less talented that's life. Maybe your daughter should transfer to a school where she can get more playing time there are plenty of high schools and clubs. All you anonymous whiners need to get a life.
Posted by: Robert | November 1, 2007 10:44 PM
Bonita school district has 2 high school ...could that kid have gone to San Dimas high??
San Dimas High and Charter Oak and Wilson should definitely find out the truth about the illegal activities at Bonita High
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 10:09 PM
Wow, what a great match for Los Altos. I have to say (LA Parent #13) in the past LA and Bonita had bad blood. Tonight was a completely different feeling. It started out with Bonita presenting Los Altos seniors with flowers and a balloon. I want Bonita to know that the parents and players were at awe. Thank You for the sportsmanship you showed for our seniors final league match. Great Job to both teams on a successful season! Go Co-Champs !!!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 9:43 PM
ok as a student at bonita i know for a fact that we have different grade sin varsity ranging from 9-12 grade. Why does it matter that she is from rancho? i mean she must be pretty good if she is on varsity. if she wasnt she wouldnt be on varsity. its that simple. And as of the issue thing ok the people who go to st. lucys and damian, they range from anywhere from fontana all the way to el monte. talk about distance and tha tis jus for private school.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 9:30 PM
While I know little of women's volleyball, I know a little about high school sports and this baloney about an out of area kid makes me nuts.
You Bonita parents should know that just living near the school doesn't assure a place on the team.
High School sports, especially at the Varsity level is about achievement, not entitlement. Bonita has a VERY STRINGENT policy of ensuring that out of District students maintain the school academic and community standards. When they are lucky enough to get a kid who can not only maintain these standards but excel on a sports team the whole community wins.
Rather than concern yourself over who is getting the attention on the Volleyball team, you should be THRILLED that skilled players from a nearby town want to attend your school and play on it's athletic teams. Kids like this make the team BETTER and schools like Bonita with high standards make the kids better STUDENTS.
Posted by: Don | November 1, 2007 9:26 PM
Los Altos in 3 looked pretty easy for them.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 8:53 PM
bonita-la results?
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 7:35 PM
She's NOT a transfer!!! New incoming 9th grade student!!! Can go to school anywhere she wants to. Read the rule book. But is it fair to those student athletes whose home school is now "open" to someone who lives 30 or 40 minutes away? Is it fair to those same athletes who waited for their chance to play that spot?? Those are the bigger questions. But you take your chances. If you go to a private school, you know going into it that this just might happen. I guess public really means public now.
Posted by: Anon | November 1, 2007 4:51 PM
Hilarious!
know the facts before you moan and groan. I'm all for parental choice. If I want to send my kid to Bonita because they have some of the highest Verbal scores on the SAT or because the Club West coach is now the volleyball coach - I should have that choice!
Posted by: Joe Amat | November 1, 2007 4:36 PM
Everyone needs to know that the Bonita 9th grade player was already in the Bonita District as a 7th and 8th grader in middle school. How is that recruiting?
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 3:49 PM
Diamond Bar-Glendora tonight?
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 2:41 PM
Rancho is about 10-15 minutes from BHS, so that is not far at all. Distance is irrelevant when it comes to eligibility.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 2:34 PM
Good year for Bonita P.R. The San Dimas incident and then this.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 2:22 PM
Besides it being the game of the week. It would make a lot of sense for Charter Oak and Wilson to jump on this issue. This might mean making or not making the playoffs.
Hopefully this is resolved ASAP and not during or post playoffs!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 2:12 PM
According to CIF - "they are investigating three different issues" GEES!!!
And we though St. Lucy's was having issues!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 2:08 PM
Bonita would have a case if her city was not so FAR. COME ON!! RANCHO- thats beyond far!! and magically she is playing for the coach that has coached her for a few years!!
Here is the worst part!! A senior who is just as good of a setter BUT TALLER (a good thing) is riding the bench because of this!!!!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 2:07 PM
That article also said that her local coach (at Monrovia) that he had prior contact, which is also illegal and could just as easily be considered undue-influence.
"Her older brother (Christian) played football for us last year," Jones, a second-year coach, said. "He told me I had to meet with his younger sister."
"...She also met with the coaching staff at Arcadia,..."
Did you know that it also considered illegal and "undue influence" to try to talk a player *out of transferring*?!?
If you have a disgruntled player/family at your school and the coach provides such *inducements" to STAY- it is still considered a violation.
Posted by: Joe Amat | November 1, 2007 1:36 PM
http://www.insidesocal.com/paspreps/2007/10/girls_volleyball_leau_making_n_1.html#comments
Did anyone read this aricle from Pasadena Star News? A player for Monrovia High mentioned about wanting to play for Bonita high.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 1:11 PM
An incoming 9th grader is not considered "a transfer" because of Rule 206.
And yes page 106 refers to Undue Influence, which is a seperate issue than residence. Remember...
Undue influence is any act, gesture or communication (including accepting material or financial inducement to
attend a CIF member school for the purpose of engaging in CIF competition regardless of the source) which is
performed personally, or through another, which may be objectively seen as an inducement, or part of a process of
inducing a student, or his or her parent or guardian, by or on behalf of, a member school, to enroll in, transfer to, or
remain in, a particular school for athletic purposes.
Now....exactly HOW were these families induced or what "material or financial inducement " was provided?
THAT is what is so hard to *prove* and is why so few cases (an ALL sports boys and girls) are proven.
Posted by: Joe Amat | November 1, 2007 1:09 PM
In simple form "a coach cannot influence or recruit a player".
If it looks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, ITS A DUCK!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 1:02 PM
why is every topic go back to St Lucy's? Haha, St Lucy's parents are setting the standard. Just fired the coach, Bonita parents should do the same so they can play everyone.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 12:59 PM
didnt the office of cif just updated their rules that clearly stated no high school coaches can be associated in any capacity with any travelling club (not just coaching on a travelling team) that their high school players play for?
Is that what is happening at Bonita and led to the termination of the ex Chino Hills coach?
It does seems funny that the topic came up before the Bonita vs Los Altos match.
Posted by: northviewfan | November 1, 2007 12:53 PM
Recruiting has been happening for a longtime and not just in volleyball.
This sounds like jealous parents who are so jealous, they are willing to sell out their own team (and potentially cost them the season)then realize that if a freshmen is starting over a senior then you have bigger problems then transfers. Where did this sense of entitlement come from? You put your best players in and that is the bottomline.
Hopefully Bonita isn't DQ'd over the AYSO mom's comments of everyone should play.
In addition, Bonita is a top ranked school academically. I think any parent who loves their kid would do the same (transfer their kid to a better school for academics and athletics.)
Or you could do it the St. Lucy way and just have the coach fired.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 12:52 PM
READ PAGE 106 of the BLUE BOOK!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 12:44 PM
what are the sierra league games today? There has got to be some big games today besides the LA-Bonita game.
There have to be some other games with playoff implications in the other leagues. What are they?
Posted by: Anonymous | November 1, 2007 12:04 PM