A-11 offense banned; horse-collar tackle penalized in many NFHS rule changes

| | Comments (16) |

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Bob Colgate

INDIANAPOLIS, IN (February 13, 2009) - The horse-collar tackle has been added to the list of illegal personal contact fouls in high school football.

This addition to Rule 9-4-3 was one of 10 rules changes approved by the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS) Football Rules Committee at its January 24-25 meeting in Indianapolis. The rules changes were subsequently approved by the NFHS Board of Directors.

Effective with the 2009 season, it will be illegal to grab the inside back or side collar of the runner's shoulder pads or jersey and subsequently pull the runner to the ground. The penalty will be 15 yards from the succeeding spot.

Julian Tackett, assistant commissioner of the Kentucky High School Athletic Association and chair of the NFHS Football Rules Committee, said the committee felt the need to continue to address risk minimization issues for the runner.

"Risk minimization continues to be one of the most important fundamentals to the rules-writing process of the NFHS," Tackett said. "Though this play does not happen often, we must ensure that our coaches and officials understand the importance of penalizing this act."

Another risk-minimization change in Rule 9-4-3 will make it illegal to grasp an opponent's chin strap, in addition to the opponent's face mask or edge of a helmet opening.

The committee made a significant change in Rule 9-8-3 in an effort to reduce the risk of injury along the sidelines. A maximum of three coaches may be in the restricted area to communicate with players during dead-ball situations. Before the ball becomes live, however, the coaches must retreat into the team box.

Bob Colgate, NFHS assistant director and liaison to the Football Rules Committee, said this rule change results in a 2-yard belt that is clear of team personnel and helps eliminate sideline congestion while helping to minimize the risk for participating players, coaches and officials during live-ball situations.

"There no longer will be an allowance for three coaches to remain in an area adjacent to the sideline when the ball is live," Colgate said. "The results of a three-year experiment were favorable, which led to the committee's support for this rule change in 2009."

A change in Rule 9-8-1g clarifies that the mandatory three-minute warm-up period begins immediately following the conclusion of the halftime intermission. An unsportsmanlike conduct penalty will be assessed to the head coach if the team is not back on the field prior to the start of the warm-up period.

Changes in Rules 7-2-5 and 2-14-2 clarify the numbering-exception rule from when it was originally approved in 1982.

"The definition of a scrimmage-kick formation was clarified to differentiate formations that have been used traditionally for attempting a field goal or kick try from those used for a punt," Colgate said. "In addition, the circumstances under which the numbering exception can be utilized have been changed to clarify what can be done on first, second, third and fourth downs."

Two changes were made in Rule 1 - The Game, Field, Players and Equipment. The committee clarified Rule 1-3-1c regarding the stripes on the football. The change states that the stripes located on the football must be adjacent to and perpendicular to the seam upon which the laces are stitched. In Rule 1-2-3b, a note was added stating that all required field markings must be clearly visible. Further, when other markings such as logos are placed on the field, the required markings shall remain visible.

Other changes approved by the Football Rules Committee:

· Rule 3-3-4b5 - If a penalty resulting in a safety occurs on the last timed down of a period, the period is not extended. The teams will change goals to start the next period.

· Rules 8-2-2, 8-2-3, 8-2-4 (new), 10-5-1f - Three rules were revised and a new article was created regarding penalty enforcement for dead-ball, non-player or unsportsmanlike fouls that occur during or after a touchdown-scoring play. The revisions now allow the offended team, in most situations, the option of enforcing the penalty on the subsequent kickoff. Fouls committed after the initial ready-for-play signal following the touchdown are not affected by this change.

· Rule 9-7-2 Exception: A foul will now occur for illegal batting by the kicking team if it bats a scrimmage kick that has not yet been grounded unless it is batted by the kicking team toward its own goal line.

"Though many of the changes in the rules were subtle clarifications, each of this year's changes ensures that the sound traditions of the game are protected and that student-athlete safety remains our top priority," Tackett said.

In addition, the committee identified six points of emphasis for the 2009 season: Illegal Personal Contact, Blocking and Illegal Blocks, Helmet and Face Mask, Uniforms, Sportsmanship and NFHS Guidelines on Handling Contests During Lightning Disturbances.

In terms of the number of participants, football is the most popular high school sport for boys. According to the 2007-08 NFHS High School Athletics Participation Survey, 1,108,286 boys played 11-player football with another 27,075 involved in six-, eight- and nine-player football. In addition, 1,225 girls played high school football in 2007-08.


16 Comments

Zora Harrel said:

That's a really great read for me, Must acknowledge that you simply are one amongst the most brilliant bloggers I ever saw.Thanks for posting this informative post.

I must have your layout tell me where you got it PLEEEAAAASSSEE!!

Dis Blog is on da for real. Hit em hard and hit em fast, Peace PLAYA

The article gave us an important Brainstorm session of all the possibilities we can utilize on our blog.

Such a usefule blog…wow !!!!

Thank you! Your words and insight on this situation are brilliant! Unfortunately, too many people are branding him a hero…

whatahorse said:

The NFHS is a recognized (not mandated) authority helping to govern amateur athletics
in 48 states and Washington, DC. However, the precedent has already been set and
repeated several times by many NFHS member schools or leagues choosing to operate
under their own modified standards or ruling bodies. Virginia, Mississippi and Iowa have
developed their own high school operating procedures, with some schools being under
the jurisdiction of the NFHS, while other schools are not beholden to the NFHS.
In the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF), there are entire sections “within” the
CIF that operate independently for their own list of reasons. Equally important is the
radical example of the step taken by the CIF in the sport of high school basketball.
For example: The (CIF) voluntarily gave up its seat on the NFHS Basketball Rules
Committee by ignoring the NFHS official position of not recognizing the use of a Shot
Clock in high school basketball games. In order to make the CIF games more exciting
and for the betterment of the kids, the CIF decided to implement the use of a Shot Clock -
regardless of the NFHS position. Therefore the CIF set another precedent relative to the
NFHS governing authority and its actual power. Clearly, it does not take a genius to see
how easily the CIF, or any other State could fairly decide to allow the A-11 Offense to
blossom in their state over the next few years to further examine the benefits of the
offense. Also, it would demonstrate a consistent effort by the CIF and other States to be
flexible in their position, regarding the use of innovation in sports for the betterment of
the kids and the game itself.

ouch said:

Don - Nice verbal "horse-collar" on stripes.

Don said:

“As an official, I'm burned by the horse-collar rule. Football is a contact sport, thus it is inherently dangerous. If you're worried about getting hurt, don't play. I'll throw my flag, but I won't like it. Posted by: Burned | February 16, 2009 9:41 PM “

Hey Stripes,
Bet you're one of those guys who doesn't “see” the helmet-as-a-weapon hits so you don't call them because football “is a contact sport”. You need to spend a few Friday nights in the ER.

Burned said:

The reason the ball is placed at the 20 is because it is a touchback. When a ball is put into play by a scrimmage kick, it becomes dead when it crosses the goal line. The result is a touchback.

hs football fan said:

to burned- regarding the ball being placed on the 20 after missed field goals-your explanation doesnt make sense- in college the ball gets palced at the line of scrimmage it should be the same in high school- the current rule doesnt make any sense and should be changed.

jcaz said:

wormseyeview

Thanks.

:)

wormseyeview said:

jcaz,
CIF is a member of NFHS. I believe CIF can adopt rules more strict than NFHS but not less strict or conflicting.

Burned said:

Yeah, bringing the ball out on kickoffs would be okay. The reason for the ball being spotted at the 20 on field goals is because it's a live ball, acting like a punt that goes into the endzone. A player can go back and catch the ball, then run with it. That one won't get changed.

As an official, I'm burned by the horse-collar rule. Football is a contact sport, thus it is inherently dangerous. If you're worried about getting hurt, don't play. I'll throw my flag, but I won't like it.
As for the new sideline rules, I love it. The coaches get in the way far too much. Pushing them into the team box for live-ball situations will make everything easier and smoother. Just gonna have to make sure the coaches stay back...

jcaz said:

Just wondering here, but, are these new rules, polices and guidelines only (in which a state biased organization such as the CIF, can just look at), or are they mandated procedures that must be adhered to by all of these organizations ?

hs football fan said:

two rule changes that i would like to see-- on a kickoff into the end zone the reciever should be able to run it out-i hate the rule that it is automatically blown dead--and the other rul change would be taht on a missed field goal the ball should be placed at the previous line of scrimmage instead of the 20 yard line- iv seen teams try long field goals knowing that if they miss the ball would go on the 20- its better if the ball is placed at the previous line of scrimmage.

Leave a comment

Fred Robledo

Fred Robledo is the Prep Sports Editor for the San Gabriel Valley Tribune. E-mail me your opinions, story ideas or tips to fred.robledo@sgvn.com.

Subscribe to RSS feed

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Fred Robledo published on February 16, 2009 2:23 PM.

Soccer pairings released was the previous entry in this blog.

Final regular season rankings is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Photos

Recent Comments

Zora Harrel on A-11 offense banned; horse-collar tackle penalized in many NFHS rule changes: That's a really great read for me, Must acknowledge that you simply ar ...

Get Backlinks on A-11 offense banned; horse-collar tackle penalized in many NFHS rule changes: I must have your layout tell me where you got it PLEEEAAAASSSEE!! ...

Divorce Source on A-11 offense banned; horse-collar tackle penalized in many NFHS rule changes: Dis Blog is on da for real. Hit em hard and hit em fast, Peace PLAYA ...

Sergio Rossi Shoes Outlet on A-11 offense banned; horse-collar tackle penalized in many NFHS rule changes: The article gave us an important Brainstorm session of all the possibi ...

Taylor Made Boat Covers on A-11 offense banned; horse-collar tackle penalized in many NFHS rule changes: Such a usefule blog…wow !!!! ...

sell structured settlement on A-11 offense banned; horse-collar tackle penalized in many NFHS rule changes: Thank you! Your words and insight on this situation are brilliant! Unf ...

whatahorse on A-11 offense banned; horse-collar tackle penalized in many NFHS rule changes: The NFHS is a recognized (not mandated) authority helping to govern am ...

ouch on A-11 offense banned; horse-collar tackle penalized in many NFHS rule changes: Don - Nice verbal "horse-collar" on stripes. ...

Don on A-11 offense banned; horse-collar tackle penalized in many NFHS rule changes: “As an official, I'm burned by the horse-collar rule. Football is a co ...

Burned on A-11 offense banned; horse-collar tackle penalized in many NFHS rule changes: The reason the ball is placed at the 20 is because it is a touchback. ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

Advertisement

Other blogs

Police warn of burglar targeting senior citizens in Monterey Park in Crime Scene
This has been the year of the coach ... in Best High School Sports Blog - Fred Robledo Talks Prep Sports
WDN Touchdown Table: Your Predictions and ours in Steve Ramirez talks Prep Sports
Star Picks: Which one is Game of the Week to you? in High School Sports Blog -- From The Sidelines with Miguel Melendez
Whale watching continues in Dana Point in Tanks for the Memories