Future skeds

| | Comments (2) |

UCLA has most of its scheduling done through 2013, and the only game I had not previously heard about (nor has been reported) was the 2011 matchup against San Jose State.
UCLA needs to add one game in 2010, one game is 2011, one game in 2012 and two games in 2013.
So below I put up a copy of the schedules, with tentative dates, through 2013.

The home games are in bold

2009
Sept. 5 San Diego State
Sept. 12 Tennessee
Sept. 19 Kansas State
Oct. 3 at Stanford
Oct. 10 Oregon
Oct. 17 California
Oct. 24 at Arizona
Oct. 31 at Oregon State
Nov. 7 Washington
Nov. 14 at Washington State
Nov. 21 Arizona State
Nov. 28 at USC

2010
Sept. 4 at Kansas State
Sept. 11 TBD
Sept. 18 at Texas
Oct. 2 Washington State
Oct. 9 at California
Oct. 16 Stanford
Oct. 23 at Oregon
Oct. 30 Arizona
Nov. 6 Oregon State

Nov. 13 at Washington
Nov. 20 at Arizona State
Dec. 4 USC

2011
Sept. 3 TBD
Sept. 10 San Jose State
Sept. 17 Texas

Sept. 24 at Stanford
Oct. 1 California
Oct. 8 Arizona State

Oct. 15 at Arizona
Oct. 29 at Oregon State
Nov. 5 Washington
Nov. 12 at Washington State
Nov. 19 Oregon
Nov. 26 at USC

2012
Sept. 1 at Rice
Sept. 8 Nebraska
Sept. 15 TBD
Sept. 22 at Oregon
Sept. 29 Stanford
Oct. 6 Arizona
Oct. 20 Oregon State
Oct. 27 at Washington
Nov. 3 at California
Nov. 10 Washington State
Nov. 17 at Arizona State
Dec. 1 USC

2013
Aug. 31 TBD
Sept. 7 TBD
Sept. 14 at Nebraska
Sept. 28 at Washington State
Oct. 5 at Arizona
Oct. 12 California
Oct. 19 Arizona State
Oct. 26 at Oregon State
Nov. 9 at Stanford
Nov. 16 Washington
Nov. 23 Oregon
Nov. 30 at USC

2 Comments

cerritosbruin Author Profile Page said:

Why so many Big 12 teams? Personally, I thought there was an Adidas thing going on. After all we did play ND and Tennessee this year. I was hoping to see Michigan (a new Adidas school) on the future skeds...

Charles O'Bannon Author Profile Page said:

I don't think it's a good idea to take on a Big Ten school. USC put Ohio State on their schedule because they always want to face the best but it's going to bite them in the ass this year as there's a real strong chance they'll face each other in the Rose Bowl (no QB and go-to receiver will give them a loss or two this year).

I understand that the Trojans have set their sights on the BCS Championship game but UCLA needs to take baby steps and should set winning the Pac-10 as our goal. That means facing the Big Ten in the Granddaddy of them all.

Do schools really set games according to endorsement affiliations? I've never noticed.

Leave a comment

About Inside UCLA

Stay on top of all UCLA sports with up-to-the-minute information and insight from Jon Gold and the rest of the Daily News sports staff.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Brian Dohn published on April 15, 2008 1:25 PM.

Secondary competition was the previous entry in this blog.

More on McConnell-Miller is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

Charles O'Bannon on Future skeds: I don't think it's a good idea to take on a Big Ten school. USC put O ...

cerritosbruin on Future skeds: Why so many Big 12 teams? Personally, I thought there was an Adidas th ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

Advertisement

Other blogs

Neuheisel ON: The Wall in Inside UCLA with Jon Gold
Galaxy, Donovan to Make "Major Player Announcement" Wednesday in 100 Percent Soccer
Answer Tuesday! (Part 3) in Inside USC with Scott Wolf
SI's fifth annual sports media in review in Farther Off the Wall
Girls Basketball: Varney shining for Oak Park in Daily News High School Spotlight