Answers, Part I

| | Comments (2) |

Thanks for all the questions this week. It was quite amazing how many came in this week (more than 115 responses and more than 150 questions), and because of it, I will have to split it over two days.
That said, I will have at least 10 sets of answers today, as well as reports from practice. I will also post answers Saturday morning, and have updates about Saturday's scrimmage.
Now, onto the first set of answers:

Why are we so obsessed with college sports?
Got me. I have my reasons, but I'm not about to answer for the masses.

If I remember correctly last summer there was some buzz around Keefe bulking up and improving his game. Then he got hurt and we didn't see him until later in the year, where at times I think he stood out. How is he doing this summer? stronger? Faster? Better?
Yes, he's bigger and faster. I spoke to him briefly last week when I saw him on campus. Is he better? Well, that will be decided in a few months. I know he's going to play an important role with Luc Richard Mbah a Moute gone, and he may also have to play a little center.

What happened with Kevin Prince? It sounded like he was looking great, but then he wasn't in the running for the starting spot when Olson went down, with Rashan jumping him.
It's difficult for a true freshman to be in the mix because training camp is so overwhelming because of everything to learn. Also, Rasshan is more elusive, and that has to factor into the equation considering UCLA's offensive line.

What other college basketball teams play exclusively man-to-man defense like UCLA does under Howland?
I don't know, but I know a lot do. I covered UConn for two seasons, and the Huskies didn't play zone defense.

If Knox redshirts like he is supposed to, will he be on the scout team?
If you red-shirt, you are on scout team. No question about it.

I don't suppose you would be looking for an intern here in the next year or two would you?
Is this a trick question? Would it be as a personal assistant, because I have plenty of chores that need to be done around the house.

was wondering how you feel about players' names on the back of their jerseys? Some people don't really care, but I've read where coaches think it promotes unity and team first thinking if the uniforms have no names on the back.
I have no preference. One thing about the college game is sometimes two players wear the same number, so it may be helpful to have the names on the back of the jersey. And as far as unity, teams with names on their back win titles all the time. Unity is built in other ways, not whether a player has a name on his back.

Are you more of a football fan than basketball fan? Do you have more knowledge of the game?
I enjoy them both, but my blood does get pumping a little more for college football. I think I have decent knowledge of both sports, considering it is how I make my livelihood.

UCLA seems to finish in the top 2 or 3 for basketball recruits a lot, but loses more than it gets. It's kind of an interesting pattern, any thoughts?
First, I trimmed a lot of your question because it was way too long. That said, finishing second and third is part of recruiting. If it was as simple as offering five kids and getting four of them, recruiting wouldn't be nearly as difficult.

Messi. Best in the world. Right?
I'll take Ronaldo after his 40+ goals last season, but Messi is right there. Man, could Liverpool use him with Stevie G.

I was under the impression Jeff Locke was going to redshirt but I read he is going to compete for kickoff duties. What happened?
I think he winds up red-shirting, but it doesn't hurt to let him practice kickoffs in case he was sensational. In the last few days the kickoff competition dwindled to Jimmy Rotstein and Kai Forbath.

2 Comments

Anonymous said:

I love Answers day! For those of us who spend alot of time on the computer all day (and thereby on the internet all day), I love this blog! I can't wait for my next tidbit of UCLA news.

Bruintx Author Profile Page said:

Unless Rotstein has improved leaps and bounds since last year, Forbath HAS to be more consistent than Jimmy. Rotstein was like a box of chocolates last year! C'mon Kai, put Jimmy out of his (our) misery.

Leave a comment

About Inside UCLA

This is Brian Dohn's sixth season covering UCLA after spending 4 1/2 years covering the Dodgers for the Daily News and other Los Angeles Newspaper Group papers. He graduated from Rutgers, where the first college football game was played in 1869. Sure, the Scarlet Knights suffered for a long time, but now RU is doing what Jerseyans always thought was possible. Winning at Rutgers also proves winning is possible everywhere else in the nation, so underachieving coaches better be careful. Now, if only men's hoops can turn it around.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Brian Dohn published on August 15, 2008 9:00 AM.

Morning briefing was the previous entry in this blog.

Answers, Part II is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

Bruintx on Answers, Part I: Unless Rotstein has improved leaps and bounds since last year, Forbath ...

Anonymous on Answers, Part I: I love Answers day! For those of us who spend alot of time on the com ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

Advertisement

Other blogs

Good News in Inside USC with Scott Wolf
UCLA vs. Rutgers football in Inside UCLA with Brian Dohn
LOKING AHEAD: LET THE CIRCUS BEGIN in Inside the Dodgers
Doughty invited to Olympic camp in Inside the Kings
Gold Cup Preview in 100 Percent Soccer