Answers, Part XVI

| | Comments (3) |

Folks, thanks again for all the questions. I hope the answers were helpful and entertaining. I'll have pregame coverage, as well as coverage during after after Saturday's game with Fresno State, so check back.
Now, onto the last set of questions for this week:

Why does every squirmish involving Bell gets his name mentioned, but the combatants in other fights remain anonymous? Isn't that unfair?
Every skirmish? This is his second, and the first one got him suspended from the team a few seasons ago.

How is UCLA doing with Kapolei HS (Hawaii) OL Stan Hasiak?
Haven't heard much lately on him, other than UCLA is still in the mix.

How do you pronounce "Brehaut"?
Bre-ho

has there been a focused effort from alumni or any other group in trying to get UCLA's administration to reconsider it's special admit policy for athletes??
No, because it is a school policy. What the school makes in athletic dollars barely even registers compared to what the school gets in donations across its campus. The administration has proven time and again football is not important, which is why they have adopted this policy. I'm not saying it's wrong, just how it is.

Do you know of any staff in the football or basketball world where they feel restricted from these admit policies?
There are plenty of schools like this, but many folks at those schools are comfortable with who they are, and don't pretend to be anything different.

Your taking the time to do this Q&A is very much appreciated. Why is it that such a good blog is compromised by so many anonymous posters. Will you improve the blog in the future by requiring all the posters to sign in on movable type?
I don't know how to handle it because I think some of the posters that cross the line the most are registered users. Any suggestions would be helpful.

3 Comments

Fan4Life Author Profile Page said:

Love the Cal comment. "Come at me, I'm a reporter!"

jdoggbruin Author Profile Page said:

hopefully the loss to oregon state will keep the "anonymous" posters from dropping by as often.

i, too, found the cal comment amusing; their panties get in such a bunch about that topic. am i allowed to say panties?

Burbank Bruin Author Profile Page said:

I'm not so sure about football being proved as not important. Southern Cal's dominance of football recently has made it a very popular school here in LA. Within the academic community, that means very little...but you can't deny the importance of a school's popularity level within the local community.

Leave a comment

About Inside UCLA

Stay on top of all UCLA sports with up-to-the-minute information and insight from Jon Gold and the rest of the Daily News sports staff.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Brian Dohn published on September 26, 2008 8:45 PM.

Answers, Part XV was the previous entry in this blog.

Readying for FSU is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

Burbank Bruin on Answers, Part XVI: I'm not so sure about football being proved as not important. Souther ...

jdoggbruin on Answers, Part XVI: hopefully the loss to oregon state will keep the "anonymous" posters f ...

Fan4Life on Answers, Part XVI: Love the Cal comment. "Come at me, I'm a reporter!" ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

Advertisement

Other blogs

Neuheisel ON: The Wall in Inside UCLA with Jon Gold
Galaxy, Donovan to Make "Major Player Announcement" Wednesday in 100 Percent Soccer
Answer Tuesday! (Part 3) in Inside USC with Scott Wolf
SI's fifth annual sports media in review in Farther Off the Wall
Girls Basketball: Varney shining for Oak Park in Daily News High School Spotlight