Answers, Part XIV (corrected)

| | Comments (3) |

It seems like I'm good for one of these a week where i forget to post the answers under the headline. Anyway, sorry aobut that. Here is the 14th set of answers:

*I hope this was good for everyone. I thought the questions were much better this week than in previous weeks.
Don't forget, I will do a chat during Saturday's basketball game against Stanford. The chat will begin at 12:30 p.m.

Do readers approach you at games? How do you feel about that?
Yes, some do, and they are always very cordial. I like meeting new people.

One of these days, could you ask Bruin football fans on this blog to suggest ways we as fans can support our team (aside from buying season tickets and donating money)?
I'm not sure what you mean.

In your opinon who would be more likely to switch back/switch to the Bruins. Hasiak or Gray?
Hasiak.

What I seemed to get from your Jrue Holiday story a couple of weeks ago is that there's a very good chance Jrue will be back next year. Seriously, what do you think? Do you really believe he will be back, or is he going pro?
I think he leaves because he will still be a top 10 pick because of his ability and potential, even if that has not showed up on the court in an easily visible manner. I'm not saying he will leave, but I think the guaranteed millions is too much to pass up when returning for another year at school won't create that big of a jump in pay.

Howland at all concerned that reeves nelson won't be the same player he recruited after his injury?
Not to my knowledge. UCLA keeps hearing Nelson will make a 100 percent recovery.

During the Dorrell years, you thought UCLA players were in the middle of the pack as far as working on football while not in practice - have you noticed an increased level in the Neuheisel's first year?
Too early for me to tell. The offseason workouts began less than a month ago.

You mentioned that during games this past season, WRs were running wrong routes during games - do you think this is a result of not working hard enough or because it was the first year with a new playbook?
Both. And by running wrong routes, that could mean a move was to be made 10 yards down the field and the receiver made the move at eight yards, or 12 yards.

After beating Cal, is UCLA back in the driver's seat for the Pac 10 championship? (Did it ever even relinquish the driver's seat?)
Never. I thought Washington would lose at least one game during its trip to the Arizona schools. And UCLA did begin the Pac-10 with five of seven games on the road. So, to answer your question, I always thought (and still do) UCLA is the team to beat.

What do you think is going on with Jrue Holiday? He's been getting in foul trouble and seems to disappear sometimes. Was I unfairly expecting an offensive juggernaut to complement Collison?
I think many of us were expecting more scoring from Holiday, but that is not the style of his game. I think Holiday's value needs to be viewed over 94 feet on the court, meaning his defense, his rebounding, his instincts and his passing ability.

Do you think the student section yelling RIGHT before CAL players shot a free throw affected their shot?
Man, I would hope not. That would not be good for a team to be that mentally weak that people yelling would make them miss.

3 Comments

VB Author Profile Page said:

It's not the students making the player miss.. It's Mark Kowal...

And Dohn, you say "UCLA is the team to beat." But you specifically said in one of the other segments that "Washington had better players on the court." Wouldn't that make them the team to beat?

Anonymous said:

If Reeves Nelson isn't 100% right now then UCLA should be very excited since he scored 37 points and had 23 rebounds in one game last week.

Brian Dohn Author Profile Page said:

VB,

Washington did have better players on the court, but over the long haul it is also important to have someone very good coaching them.

Leave a comment

About Inside UCLA

This is Brian Dohn's sixth season covering UCLA after spending 4 1/2 years covering the Dodgers for the Daily News and other Los Angeles Newspaper Group papers. He graduated from Rutgers, where the first college football game was played in 1869. Sure, the Scarlet Knights suffered for a long time, but now RU is doing what Jerseyans always thought was possible. Winning at Rutgers also proves winning is possible everywhere else in the nation, so underachieving coaches better be careful. Now, if only men's hoops can turn it around.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Brian Dohn published on January 31, 2009 10:31 AM.

Making the grade was the previous entry in this blog.

Halftime update is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

Brian Dohn on Answers, Part XIV (corrected): VB, Washington did have better players on the court, but over the lo ...

Anonymous on Answers, Part XIV (corrected): If Reeves Nelson isn't 100% right now then UCLA should be very excited ...

VB on Answers, Part XIV (corrected): It's not the students making the player miss.. It's Mark Kowal... And ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

Advertisement

Other blogs

Good News in Inside USC with Scott Wolf
UCLA vs. Rutgers football in Inside UCLA with Brian Dohn
LOKING AHEAD: LET THE CIRCUS BEGIN in Inside the Dodgers
Doughty invited to Olympic camp in Inside the Kings
Gold Cup Preview in 100 Percent Soccer