Weekly Q&A

| | Comments (21) |

Hey guys,

Fire away with questions for this week's Q&A. Please don't post new questions on the answers section, because I don't always check the comments. Either post new questions on here or in the midweek Q&A.

Thanks
Jon

21 Comments

Anonymous said:

Who is a better writer, you or Wolf?

Anonymous said:

Why does the media when talking about recruiting in the Pac-10 only mention teams such as
Cal,Sc,Oregon and Stanford and no mention of Ucla? The last time I checked we have out recruited everyone but Sc.

TennesseeBruin Author Profile Page said:

From what I've read on your blog, you've been a fairly accurate defender of Howland so far this season and I appreciate your efforts. After last night's loss, how do you feel differently? Clearly, there are problems in Westwood that were avoidable, such as flawed recruiting and rotation. What do you feel are the biggest issues that need to be addressed?

cv Author Profile Page said:

Jon, can you tell us why ucla athletics is so down over all?

gilligan Author Profile Page said:

Mr. Gold, recently articles have been published about expanding the PAC 10 to include either Utah and Colorado; or Texas and either previous team, what are your thoughts about expansion? I doubt that Texas would leave the Big 12 but on the one hand I would be curious to see if the Pac 10 would pursue TCU and Houston considering that both teams are in big TV markets and their areas develop great recruits year round. Thank you in advance.

VB Author Profile Page said:

1) Kinda a weird question, but something I thought about yesterday: If Neuheisel's son walks on to the team, and Neuheisel, as his father, pays his tuition at UCLA, would that be an NCAA infraction?

2) Do you think Owa and Malcolm Jones will be 4 year players since they are big on academics?

blackstone Author Profile Page said:

Aside from the early departures from NBA guys, it seems clear the talent deficit is from the other guys from the last three classes, e.g. Keefe, Stanback, Anderson, Gordon, Morgan. Of the younger guys, who will develop into a solid starter next year?

Tustin Paul said:

Shabazz Muhammad was visiting USC for the UCLA game, did you see him and if so how did he seem at the end of the night? What are the odds that he commits to either program?

H8T SuC said:

JG
Can you tell us how Basketball recruiting is going for CBH?....AND if he is still going after PG's Ray McCallum, and Trey Zeigler ?

Thanks

Sunset Bruin Author Profile Page said:

You posted in December that a "big name" player was about to commit to UCLA football. Who was it, and what happened that delayed the commitment?

theuclan Author Profile Page said:

Jon
Typically how many of the questions do you get to? and what type of questions are you looking for? It seems you really don't get to a good portion of the questions here but always answer one joking around about food or tv shows?

cliq said:

Not really apples to apples but... what's more impactful to 2010-2011, a good qb or a good pg?

BRUINBEATCH Author Profile Page said:

ARE you F N kidding me people!BEN HOWLAND is a damn gOOD coach we will be very sorry if we let him go!One bad season and not that bad considering all we have lost and everyone panics? You idiots would be singing a diffrent tune had we won on sunday!No one hates losing to SC more than me but it like our 13-9 win against them means SHIT!I do however think that Ben better start recruiting hard as of NOW!Relax people it isnt Howland it is how UCLA sales itself we need to start with Pauley and Media and i agree the fans need to get more involved!GET OFF HOWLANDS BACK !

von hasardye said:

You seem to be one to advocate tempering down our expectations for football, like Dohn. However, if UCLA's fanbase is asked to be happy with just barely being bowl eligible, how does that represent an upgrade over the Dorrell era? Is it really too much to ask for incremental improvement? For example, finishing the season ranked would be a big step in the right direction, which would require 8 wins at the minimum, plus a bowl win. If UCLA fancies itself as anything better than a mediocre football program, why should the expectations be any lower for 2010. I know you think UCLA fans are unrealistic, but tempered expectations don't really lead anywhere in my eyes. If you shoot for the stars and come up short, you've still accomplished something.

TennesseeBruin Author Profile Page said:

Jon, in case you miss it, I'd read a pretty insightful comment left after Answers Part 3 about filtering these questions. I think a lot of your readers would agree with this statement and it would strengthen this blog. These questions should be filtered. It's pretty obvious when non-Bruin fans ask questions.

Anonymous said:

Jon
when is Junior day for UCLA football?

Anonymous said:

It seems UCLA players were pretty winded compared to SC players even though SC doesn't go as deep as UCLA. What is UCLA's typical strength and conditioning program for their BB players.

Anonymous said:

On one of the answer forums a person posted OWA's scout recruiting profile. http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=8&c=1&nid=3752203 Scout "claims" he got an 1190 on the 3 part sat. I have a hard time believing that to be true considering he was a well-spoken young man, can you confirm if he got that score or if it is higher on a re-take?

kevin said:

Very broad and general question: Signs point towards an NFL lockout in 2011. How do you think this will affect players at the college level?

Count_Blah Author Profile Page said:

Gold,

What is Dragovic better at hitting... 3-pointers, or women's faces?

Chris said:

Why aren't we recruiting Cory Joseph? By all accounts he is a great talent at a position of need? Is it academics or something else?

Leave a comment

About Inside UCLA

Stay on top of all UCLA sports with up-to-the-minute information and insight from Jon Gold and the rest of the Daily News sports staff.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jon Gold published on February 14, 2010 10:51 PM.

UCLA cleans glass, but can't convert was the previous entry in this blog.

Reeves Nelson, on the loss to USC is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

Chris on Weekly Q&A: Why aren't we recruiting Cory Joseph? By all accounts he is a great t ...

Count_Blah on Weekly Q&A: Gold, What is Dragovic better at hitting... 3-pointers, or women's fa ...

kevin on Weekly Q&A: Very broad and general question: Signs point towards an NFL lockout in ...

Anonymous on Weekly Q&A: On one of the answer forums a person posted OWA's scout recruiting pro ...

Anonymous on Weekly Q&A: It seems UCLA players were pretty winded compared to SC players even t ...

Anonymous on Weekly Q&A: Jon when is Junior day for UCLA football? ...

TennesseeBruin on Weekly Q&A: Jon, in case you miss it, I'd read a pretty insightful comment left af ...

von hasardye on Weekly Q&A: You seem to be one to advocate tempering down our expectations for foo ...

BRUINBEATCH on Weekly Q&A: ARE you F N kidding me people!BEN HOWLAND is a damn gOOD coach we will ...

cliq on Weekly Q&A: Not really apples to apples but... what's more impactful to 2010-2011, ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

Advertisement

Other blogs

Morning Buzz in Inside USC with Scott Wolf
CIF Championship Regionals in Daily News High School Spotlight
Coming Sunday: What's it all about, Angie? in Farther Off the Wall
Weekend TV Football Viewing Options in 100 Percent Soccer
Nelson update in Inside UCLA with Jon Gold