Pac-16 reportedly a go

| | Comments (8) |

Chip Brown of Orangebloods.com, who has simply been the MAN in all this Pac-10 expansion talks, has written that it looks like it's a go. Except the new six might be changing a bit.

Brown reports that Texas, Texas Tech, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State will join the Pac-10 as early as next week, but that Texas A&M is now flirting with the SEC. If the Aggies go east, either Utah or Kansas could gobble up the extra spot.

Here's a link to the story: I'm an idiot. Here's the link.

8 Comments

Anonymous said:

The link didn't come through. Can you post it please?

Mike H class of 90 said:

Interesting note about the new league pushing for 2 automatic BCS entries (since the Big 12 will no longer have an automatic entry) - one presumably from each division...

Anonymous said:

Texas FB and Kansas BB in the Pac n?

Awesome!

spedjones Author Profile Page said:

love it. this will be GREAT for UCLA and the rest of the PAC.

Larry said:

Oh man... This would be awesome. I would LOVE to replace A&M with Kansas. What a great bball conf we would have with UCLA, Texas, Oklahoma, AZ, and Kansas.

Reformed Droog Author Profile Page said:

Not only that, but Kansas City is #31 TV market versus Lubbock (#148). That makes the conference even more likely to get better airtime.

ucla2k3 Author Profile Page said:

Texas A&M can go to the SEC and get pounded by the likes of Florida, Alabama, and LSU on a regular basis. I have no problem with that. I would very much rather have Kansas over A&M and Utah simply because the Jayhawks offer a much superior basketball program to the Pac-16 conference.

Corney in Kansas said:

Kansas would be even better than the Aggies, especially bringing in the BB program.

Pulling in "the City" on the Mighty Missouri, would also open up cable TV into northern Missouri for recruiting.

Leave a comment

About Inside UCLA

Stay on top of all UCLA sports with up-to-the-minute information and insight from Jon Gold and the rest of the Daily News sports staff.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jon Gold published on June 11, 2010 1:23 PM.

Weekly Answers, Pt. 2 was the previous entry in this blog.

Weekly Answers, Pt. 3 is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

Corney in Kansas on Pac-16 reportedly a go: Kansas would be even better than the Aggies, especially bringing in th ...

ucla2k3 on Pac-16 reportedly a go: Texas A&M can go to the SEC and get pounded by the likes of Florida, A ...

Reformed Droog on Pac-16 reportedly a go: Not only that, but Kansas City is #31 TV market versus Lubbock (#148). ...

Larry on Pac-16 reportedly a go: Oh man... This would be awesome. I would LOVE to replace A&M with Kans ...

spedjones on Pac-16 reportedly a go: love it. this will be GREAT for UCLA and the rest of the PAC. ...

Anonymous on Pac-16 reportedly a go: Texas FB and Kansas BB in the Pac n? Awesome! ...

Mike H class of 90 on Pac-16 reportedly a go: Interesting note about the new league pushing for 2 automatic BCS entr ...

Anonymous on Pac-16 reportedly a go: The link didn't come through. Can you post it please? ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

Advertisement

Other blogs

Name Game in Inside USC with Scott Wolf
The aftermath: U.S.- England in 100 Percent Soccer
HS FOOT: Crenshaw's Martin commits to USC in Daily News High School Spotlight
UCLA finally comes through in Inside UCLA with Jon Gold
U.S. 1, England 1 in Inside the Lakers